[mapguide-users] AGG vs GD rendering

I have put some screenshots on my blog contrasting the results of using AGG and GD renderers http://zacster.blogspot.com/2008/02/mapguide-20-agg-versus-gd-renderers.html The AGG lines seem to be too thick? z -- Zac Spitzer - http://zacster.blogspot.com (My Blog) +61 405 847 168

[mapguide-users] Use of GDAL 3.2.2 in mgos2.0

Hi all, I wonder if i can use of GDAL 3.2.2 in MGOS 2.0, because it doesnt work with my tiled pictures. And if is posible what should i do? Klemen ___ mapguide-users mailing list mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org

Re: [mapguide-users] Mapguide Trac is down

Zac Spitzer wrote: Running a report gives the following error: Report execution failed: database is locked Zac, I did a quick check and it seems to be working now. Best regards, -- ---+-- I set the clouds in motion -

RE: [mapguide-users] MG 2.0 RC4 selection ALMOST working

Is that just for PostGIS, or is it happening for other feature providers too? Currently Tom has moved that RC4 be tagged as release, so if this is something that is not specific to the PostGIS provider and it is critical, you should make sure to create a ticket in Trac with enough information

RE: [mapguide-users] MG 2.0 RC4 selection ALMOST working

Oh, looking at your contribution to that thread, it looks like that problem is Fusion-specific, which is different than ary's problem (which is PostGIS-specific). I'm seeing this Fusion selection problem myself on Windows2k3, IIS installation. Jason From:

Re: [mapguide-users] MG 2.0 RC4 selection ALMOST working

Yeah, we use no PostGIS data; all of our files are SDF, and some are SDF converted from Oracle. When we make a selection in Fusion, nothing is highlighted until we click 'Refresh Map', and then our selection shows up. It isn't a huge deal to us, but none of our selection properties show up in

Re: [mapguide-users] MG 2.0 RC4 selection ALMOST working

Note that if you are testing with the fusion/samples/mapguide/standard example, the SelectionPanel and SelectionInfo widgets aren't enabled in the ApplicationDefinition.xml file as shipped. You have to uncomment those widgets in the file. We should probably change that so those widgets are

Re: [mapguide-users] MG 2.0 RC4 selection ALMOST working

We realized about the Selection widgets, and we went ahead and included those in the ApplicationDefinition.xml files that we used. We also noted that the selection does indeed work with the Sheboygan maps, and as soon as you select parcels, the map refreshes to indicate your selection, as well

Re: [mapguide-users] MG 2.0 RC4 selection ALMOST working

What response are you getting from Query.php for your maps? Mike Jonathan Manafi wrote: We realized about the Selection widgets, and we went ahead and included those in the ApplicationDefinition.xml files that we used. We also noted that the selection does indeed work with the Sheboygan

Re: [mapguide-users] MG 2.0 RC4 selection ALMOST working

This is the response from a query: Object not foundERROR: The specified object was not found. The specified object was not found. Exception occurred in method GetItem at line 117 in file d:\buildforgeprojects\mapguide_open_source_v2 .0\build_22.4\mgdev\common\foundation\Data/NamedCollection.cpp

RE: [mapguide-users] AGG vs GD rendering

Antialiased lines of width 1 pixel do generally look a bit thicker than they should, when compared to non-AA lines. This is because exact pixel coverage is computed, and neighboring pixels are also affected a little bit. Some more in-depth explanations can be found here:

Re: [mapguide-users] AGG vs GD rendering

hi! What is faster AGG vs GD? What are yours experience? macieksk ___ mapguide-users mailing list mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users

RE: [mapguide-users] AGG vs GD rendering

Depends on the data. In general I expect AGG to be faster in text-heavy maps and GD to be faster in polygon heavy maps. Line-heavy maps would be a tossup, depending on line width. YMMV. Traian From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

[mapguide-users] MGOS 2 RC4 Observations

Finally got around to testing RC4 a little and here are my observations. The test platform is a VMWare instance running Windows XP, using the .NET web extensions, and testing with IE and Firefox. Testing was difficult due to instability and crashing issues with Autodesk MapGuide Studio 2009 beta,

Re: [mapguide-users] MG 2.0 RC4 selection ALMOST working

The exception is corrupting the json formatted response so when Query.php returns there is a (likely suppressed) javascript error that prevents Fusion from processing the selection and hence other widgets from responding to it to load the selection. Mike, we should be able to reproduce

Re: [mapguide-users] MG 2.0 RC4 selection ALMOST working

ahhh ajax. the secret deadly ninja of web apps. On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The exception is corrupting the json formatted response so when Query.php returns there is a (likely suppressed) javascript error that prevents Fusion from processing the

Re: [mapguide-users] MG 2.0 RC4 selection ALMOST working

Ok, I found Jason's problem but it was in code that is not in the general release so I don't know where the other problem is coming from even though it has the same exception. In Jason's case, there was a layer being programmatically created that had an incorrect property mapping (it

Re: [mapguide-users] MGOS 2 RC4 Observations

My observations so far: - Feature Joins are now working properly again (took 3 RCs to get there), but performance has somewhat degraded as a result. - There are lots of minor bugs/annoyances/usability problems with Fusion and/or the 5 example templates. Case in point: the number of Fusion