[mapguide-users] Mapguide user rights based on area

2014-01-27 Thread Kajar
HI! I know I can give user rights to see different data(feature source, layer, map or web layout). But is it possible to give user rigts to see only specific data based on area. All data will be served from one feature source(sdf) to both users, but one user can see one area data and other

Re: [mapguide-users] Mapguide user rights based on area

2014-01-27 Thread Rémy GOURRAT
No, it's not possible without specific development. Rémy ___ mapguide-users mailing list mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users

Re: [mapguide-users] Mapguide user rights based on area

2014-01-27 Thread Berg, James
For something like that you would have to create programming logic with the web server API. If I was the one who needed to implement what you described I would start by creating a database of some kind to store user account information along with some parameters for permissions (access to

Re: [mapguide-users] Styling

2014-01-27 Thread Steve G
Yes. Assuming that you are trying to use that style as a fill-in for polygons and Maestro 5.x (although I recall this function hasn't changed in a while). In Maestro after creating your feature source definition, add a new a new Vector Layer Definition. Then: 1. Under Layer Styles frame

Re: [mapguide-users] Mapguide user rights based on area

2014-01-27 Thread Kajar
Thanks for advice. That i thought its not smartest thing to do. I just want to use one map definition for both users who have differents rights(one user have permission to see several layers and other user cant). I just thought if I let one user to see specific layer and second one just cant

Re: [mapguide-users] Mapguide user rights based on area

2014-01-27 Thread Ryan Northcott
Can't you just make two maps and give out two different links. If you aren't spawning a link from a Programmed page just send the two groups different urls. - sent via mobile phone On Jan 27, 2014, at 4:14 PM, Kajar kajar.kulds...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for advice. That i thought its