rameter, so it's not really a
>> "clean" fix per say, but atleast it makes things work under Firefox.
>>
>>
>> Andy Morsell wrote:
>>>
>>> Correction, http://trac.osgeo.org/fusion/ticket/232 does not appear to
>>> be a
>>> p
Andy,
I agree.
I would tend to think that the legend is a pretty fundamental element and if
that has issues: http://trac.osgeo.org/fusion/ticket/244
I am hard pressed to give Fusion the time-of-day. Yes, Fusion sure does make
things alot prettier and such BUT ... gee whiz get the fundamentals r
From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Spencer
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:44 PM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
s.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
] On Behalf Of Berdel, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:32 PM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
Thanks Dave, but I have tried that and it has the same result with
multiple maps. Maps with
Of Paul
Spencer
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:44 PM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
argh - that shouldn't have changed, must be some difference in IE and
Firefox that we never noticed. What we really
lf Of Paul Spencer
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:44 PM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
argh - that shouldn't have changed, must be some difference in IE and
Firefox that we never noticed. What we really need is a method of
generating a si
idea...
Brian
-Original Message-
From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paul Spencer
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:44 PM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
argh - that shou
.org
] On Behalf Of Berdel, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:32 PM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
Thanks Dave, but I have tried that and it has the same result with
multiple maps. Maps with < 20 or so load fine in IE. The maps I am
us
...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Berdel, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:32 PM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
Thanks Dave, but I have tried that and it has the same result with multiple
maps. Maps with < 20 or so load fine in IE. The maps I
nal Message-
From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Dave Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:03 PM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
Increase the memory settings in your php.
Behalf Of Berdel, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 10:36 AM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
Also, A map with a lot of layers (50 +) takes an extremely long time to load in
IE 7 & 8. No problem in FireFox and Chrome, but I receive
sage-
From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mike Adair
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 11:10 AM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
Also, patches are welcome if anybody has fixed an
s work under Firefox.
>
>
> Andy Morsell wrote:
>>
>> Correction, http://trac.osgeo.org/fusion/ticket/232 does not appear to be
>> a
>> problem in this version.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
>>
This is very valid. We have not been able to put any time into Fusion
in the past little while, Mike will be able to work on cutting a new
release in the near future with an emphasis on getting known issues
fixed especially when there are tickets and patches provided.
Paul
On 29-Jun-09, a
: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
Poor choice of 3 letter acronym :-) What I should've said is AJAX viewer is
pretty much feature complete given its design constraints (The WebLayout xml
schema)
- Jackie
Martin Morrison wrote:
>
> I wouldn't say Ajax is EOL...it sti
ay, June 29, 2009 8:50 PM
> To: mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
>
> Agreed 100%
>
> Since Fusion is the way to do things now and the AJAX viewer is
> essentially
> EOL, it is imperative that we have a good out of th
No offense to fusion builder8
-Original Message-
From: sco...@mpowerinnovations.com
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 8:16 PM
To: Martin Morrison ; MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
I Agree..I like the look and feel...but the load time is ages
: Monday, June 29, 2009 8:03 PM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
I wouldn't say Ajax is EOL...it still has a purpose. Get Fusion as fast and as
solid as Ajax and then you can start to think about retiring Ajax.
M
lf Of Jackie Ng
[jumpinjac...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 8:50 PM
To: mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
Agreed 100%
Since Fusion is the way to do things now and the AJAX viewer is essentially
EOL, it is imperative that we have a goo
Agreed 100%
Since Fusion is the way to do things now and the AJAX viewer is essentially
EOL, it is imperative that we have a good out of the box user story with
Fusion.
I personally have not had a clean experience with previous mapguide
releases, I always needed to patch the fusion installation
If MapGuide is released with yet another failed attempt at "Fusion"
layouts, I feel this would be the end of the road for normal everyday
users for a long time. I agree make sure the viewers that are
advertised as "included" are working before the release so everyone is
100% happy.
On Fri, Jun 26,
lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Andy
Morsell
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 10:56 AM
To: 'MapGuide Users Mail List'
Subject: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
Hi all,
I installed MGOS 2.1 Beta yesterday and here are several Fusion
l List'
Subject: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
Hi all,
I installed MGOS 2.1 Beta yesterday and here are several Fusion
problems that I’m seeing:
· Firefox is still prompting for user authentication even
when SESSION is passed as a URL parameter. It works ok in IE. This
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 10:56 AM
To: 'MapGuide Users Mail List'
Subject: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
Hi all,
I installed MGOS 2.1 Beta yesterday and here are several Fusion problems
that Im seeing:
* Firefox is still prompting for user authentication even wh
n Behalf Of Andy Morsell
> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 10:56 AM
> To: 'MapGuide Users Mail List'
> Subject: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
>
> Hi all,
> I installed MGOS 2.1 Beta yesterday and here are several Fusion problems
> that Im seeing:
>
> *
List'
Subject: [mapguide-users] 2.1 Beta (Fusion) Problems
Hi all,
I installed MGOS 2.1 Beta yesterday and here are several Fusion problems
that Im seeing:
* Firefox is still prompting for user authentication even when
SESSION is passed as a URL parameter. It works ok in IE. Thi
I'm looking forward to seeing if your mrsid/ecw's work - I never did
get them working. This SESSION problem in Firefox would also be a show
stopper for me (if I needed another one).
Andrew
On 6/26/2009 2:55 PM, Andy Morsell wrote:
Hi all,
I
installed MGOS 2.1 Beta
Hi all,
I installed MGOS 2.1 Beta yesterday and here are several Fusion problems
that Im seeing:
* Firefox is still prompting for user authentication even when
SESSION is passed as a URL parameter. It works ok in IE. This has been
mentioned in other threads here.
* The Secondary
28 matches
Mail list logo
