here are my performance observataions using a largish map
1.2 GD takes 15s,
2.0 AGG takes 20s
2.0 GD takes 19s
All the feature sources are the same SDF files and there are no joins involved
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 7:56 AM, shreepad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good observations.
> I have tes
Good observations.
I have tested it with SDE 9.2 works really well much better than 1.2
migrated one test application
Works good speed is still a issue. did not work on fusion technology yet
with migrated app.
as its giving me all kinds of different results. May be for now I will stick
to normal
My observations so far:
- Feature Joins are now working properly again (took 3 RCs to get there),
but performance has somewhat degraded as a result.
- There are lots of minor bugs/annoyances/usability problems with Fusion
and/or the 5 example templates. Case in point: the number of Fusion relate
Finally got around to testing RC4 a little and here are my observations.
The test platform is a VMWare instance running Windows XP, using the .NET
web extensions, and testing with IE and Firefox. Testing was difficult due
to instability and crashing issues with Autodesk MapGuide Studio 2009 beta,