In a message dated 11/5/99 6:13:56 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Consider instead the tremendous competitive edge MapInfo would get if GM
and MapBasic were included in MI Professional, at no extra cost.
Particularly in areas where ESRI is "giving" away the product in order to
convert
How does one communicate with MI management about things like this? That is,
the huge price of Geometry Manager
If I were a shareholder - and this kind of behavior is why I am not - I'd be
wanting MI to include a product like this and MapBasic with MI professional.
Just how much $ can they
Mats,
I could not agree more with you, Chuck and Dick. There is a VAST market
waiting to be driven from ArcSpew to MapInfo if it incorporated these basic
tools to enhance the topographical issues that ArcInfo addresses for ESRI.
Our major client base uniformly uses AutoCad. At some point in
