At 23:41 21.10.1999 -0400, you wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, ton wrote:
As a side effect your client will eventually thank you for
getting rid of Akeview...
...and replacement with superior software.
What's wrong with ArcView? I didn't like it when I tried it millions of
years
Dear Carl,
Choose option 4 and include vertical mapper.
This is likely to be much less expensive than conversion.
As a side effect your client will eventually thank you for
getting rid of Akeview...
...and replacement with superior software.
Regards,
Ton Brouwer
-Original
Hi Carl,
I haven't used UT under 5.5 but I do use it a lot under 5.0 and it works
really well, although there are a couple of annoying things that it does,
the worst being to add the name "_region", "_text" (or similar) to the final
coverage name. (Remember that arcview can only have one feature
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, ton wrote:
As a side effect your client will eventually thank you for
getting rid of Akeview...
...and replacement with superior software.
What's wrong with ArcView? I didn't like it when I tried it millions of
years ago, but surely it's improved since
