An update of the GIS Website Ratings for September 2000 is (finally)
available on the RPM Information Network at http://rpmconsulting.com.  This
September marks the two year anniversary of these ratings, and an historical
archive is also available.  As a reminder, these metrics are based on server
and network diagnostics, and upon the form, structure and design of served
pages, and not on the habits of a panel.

These two years have seen some remarkable changes in the virtual GIS
landscape.  The Web has made maps so ubiquitous that they are now advertised
in the US on Monday Night Football.  Indeed, the shift towards maps for a
mass audience and away from peer-to-peer tech talk mirrors the chasm
crossing for the entire Web.  Many of us expected GIS and mapping
applications to hit the mainstream around the year 2000 -- but few
anticipated that Mapquest would be the "killer app", though many anticipated
a Microsoft entry to help things along.  A brief review of the September
1998 ratings shows that 3 of the major GIS vendors were among the Top 5,000
visited sites on the Web at that time. Today, none are -- with only ESRI
among the Top 10,000, and only Bentley (site recently redesigned and very
pretty) and MapInfo (site still relatively slow) improving visitation from
the measures of two years ago.  Except for the top vendor sites, all of the
top sites for September 2000 prominently serve maps.  Even traffic at the
venerable Xerox PARC site has picked up.  Also notable is the growing
prominence of the National Geographic Map Machine.

Among the data portals, the big news is perhaps the nascent Geography
Network, with its promise of tying users (and their digital resources)
together across the globe.  But it is the GIS Data Depot where visits are
currently most prominent -- a well-organized site robust with basic content.

It certainly would be wonderful if someone at the U.S. BLM would pick up
where the late Sol Katz left off -- if that is even possible.  Traffic to
Sol's site continues, but it has not been revised in a long time and is,
sadly, starting to feel like a ghost town.

In 2000, we added a suite of format tests to help webmasters improve their
document, table and form structure and image syntax.  This makes pages load
more correctly and faster.  Virtually every site rated continues to contain
some type of error, and some remain particularly sloppy.  Most often the
culprit is image syntax, usually the failure to place WIDTH, HEIGHT and ALT
tags.  When WIDTH and HEIGHT are not set, pages take longer to load because
it takes time for the browser to recognize page layout.  The ALT tag is
important so that users who don't see the images can still know what they
are.  This effects not only users with older and non-graphical browsers and
those with images turned off, but particularly those who are visually
impaired or who are accessing the web by phone with a screen reader.  Two
commercial sites (Claritas and MicroImages/TNT) and two non-commercial ones
(Odden's Bookmarks and AI-Geostats, both redesigned) are coded perfectly.

Finally, this month's visitors to the RPM Infonet at
http://rpmconsulting.com will find some powerful new tools for banking
research and planning in the new dataBank portion of the site.  Public
health practitioners will find an update on RPM's activities in Mozambique
and an archive of Chuck Croner's fine Public Health GIS newsletters,
including the current issue.  Coming this Fall is Powerstation, a dedicated
site for business geographics.

As always, we look forward to your visits, comments and contributions.

*************************************
Steve Lackow
RPM Consulting
17130 Devonshire St
Northridge CA 91325
818-831-7607
http://rpmconsulting.com
*************************************
"Alice had not the slightest idea
what Latitude was, or Longitude
either, but she thought they were
nice grand words to say."
-- Lewis Carroll





----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
"unsubscribe MAPINFO-L" in the message body, or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to