RE: MI Problem discovered w/Bounds Clause

1999-01-17 Thread Jacques Paris
I can only repeat what I have written here already but maybe too long ago. The cosmetic layer is in the MapInfo default "projection" : lon/lat in degrees not bounded. (see the discussion on internal precision way back) And there is nothing to do about it. Steve's advice not to use the cosmetic

RE: MI Problem discovered w/Bounds Clause

1999-01-17 Thread Steve Wallace
At 04:37 PM 11/19/1999 +1000, Robert Crossley wrote: Do you know if the object variables also unbounded as well? It could explain some of the problems with object processing that I have been having with finding coincident points. Could also be the cause of the GPFs I've been getting with

RE: MI Problem discovered w/Bounds Clause

1999-01-16 Thread Robert Crossley
Do you know if the object variables also unbounded as well? It could explain some of the problems with object processing that I have been having with finding coincident points. Could also be the cause of the GPFs I've been getting with merging using projected data into a variable. Rob.