Re: [VOTE] Merging branch HDFS-7240 to trunk

Sorry for jumping in late into the fray of this discussion. It seems Ozone is a large feature. I appreciate the development effort and the desire to get this into the hands of users. I understand the need to iterate quickly and to reduce overhead for development. I also agree that Hadoop can

Re: [VOTE] Merge feature branch YARN-5355 (Timeline Service v2) to trunk

That makes sense to me, after merge to trunk and branch 2, it probably makes sense to create a new jira and feature branch for atsv2 additional feature dev. Cheers, Joep On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Vrushali C wrote: > Hi Subru, > > Thanks for your vote and your

Re: [VOTE] Merge feature branch YARN-5355 (Timeline Service v2) to trunk

+1 (non-binding) for the merge @Vinod I hope that means a +1 from you as well! Cheers, Joep On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < vino...@apache.org> wrote: > Such a great community effort - hats off, team! > > Thanks > +Vinod > > > On Aug 21, 2017, at 11:32 PM, Vrushali

Re: [DISCUSS] Looking to a 2.9.0 release

Thanks Vrushali for being entirely open as to the current status of ATSv2. I appreciate that we want to ensure things are tested at scale, and as you said we are working on that right now on our clusters. We have tested the feature to demonstrate it works at what we consider moderate scale. I

Re: Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release

Hi Vinod, We've gone through the various lists of upstream jiras and wanted to provide our take on what we'd like to see in 2.6.1 release. In addition, we have ~58 jiras (some a group of work such as DN maintenance state) that we already have in production in a pre-2.6 release. I've gone through

Re: Hadoop - Major releases

Here are some of our thought on the discussions of the past few days with respect to backwards compatibility. In general at Twitter we're not necessarily against backwards incompatible changes per se. *It depends on the Return on Pain. While it is hard to quantify the returns in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha

Thanks for the hadoop-2.0.5-alpha RC0 Cos! +1 (non-binding) in principle for a 2.0.5-alpha release. Similar to Alejandro I see that: /hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-src/hadoop-hdfs-project/README.txt (has 2.0.4 release date missing): Release 2.0.5-alpha - UNRELEASED Release 2.0.4-alpha - UNRELEASED

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha

Thanks for fixing Cos. http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/ looks good to me. +1 (non-binding) Thanks, Joep On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: Ok, WRT HDFS-4646 - it is all legit and the code is in branch-2.0.4-alpha and later. It

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.0.5-alpha (rc1)

+1 (non-binding) Joep On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: All, I have created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I would like to release. This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues discovered

Re: Mapping between the JIRA and files changed

Different versions of the patch are supposed to have the same name, and could be sorted by date. A different name should be used to indicate the target branch. See the Naming your patch section on http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute Cheers, Joep On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:13 PM,