Re: [DISCUSS] making Ozone a separate Apache project

+1 Thanks - Tsuyoshi On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 19:42 Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, > Rakesh > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:23 PM Elek, Marton wrote: > > > > > > > I would like to start a discussion to make a separate Apache project for > > Ozone > > > > > > > > ### HISTORY [1] > >

Re: [DISCUSS] hadoop-thirdparty 1.0.0 release

Thanks Viany for starting discussion. +1 hadoop-thirdparty's release is required for 3.3.0 release because the package includes shaded protobuf which 3.3.0 branch will depend on. The plan sounds reasonable to me. - Tsuyoshi On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 6:31 AM Ayush Saxena wrote: > > Thanx Vinay

Re: Can we update protobuf's version on trunk?

ion time by using syntax = "proto2""... - Tsuyoshi On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: >> Stack mentioned a compatibility mode that uses the proto2 semantics. > > We can define protobuf's version by using syntax = "proto2" or

Re: Can we update protobuf's version on trunk?

> Stack mentioned a compatibility mode that uses the proto2 semantics. We can define protobuf's version by using syntax = "proto2" or syntax = "proto3" in proto files with proto3 compiler. I think this is what Stack mentioned as compatibility mode.

Re: Can we update protobuf's version on trunk?

Forwarding to common-dev, hdfs-dev, mapreduce-dev too. Thanks - Tsuyoshi 2017年3月27日(月) 21:16 Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org>: > Dear Hadoop developers, > > After shaded client, introduced by HADOOP-11804, is merged, > we can more easily update some dependency with min

Re: About 2.6.5 and 2.7.4 release

> Chiwan Park reported Hadoop incompatibility by the change of HADOOP-11252. > Now, HADOOP-13579 is committed to branch-2.6 and branch-2.7. complement: HADOOP-13579 fixes the problem of incompatibility by HADOOP-11252. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Tsuyoshi Oza

About 2.6.5 and 2.7.4 release

Hi developers, Chiwan Park reported Hadoop incompatibility by the change of HADOOP-11252. Now, HADOOP-13579 is committed to branch-2.6 and branch-2.7. Should we release 2.6.5 and 2.7.4 soon? Thanks, - Tsuyoshi - To

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0-alpha1 RC0

ess of configuring yarn.app.mapreduce.am.env and mapreduce.admin.user.env... does anyone hit same error? This was because of completely my wrong configuration. Please ignore this. Best, - Tsuyoshi On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: > Thank

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0-alpha1 RC0

I'm sorry, very big typo I did... s/hardly/very hard/ Best - Tsuyoshi On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for making this forward hardly, Andrew! > > In fact, I hit an error similar to Eric's one regardless of > configuring yarn.ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0-alpha1 RC0

Thanks for making this forward hardly, Andrew! In fact, I hit an error similar to Eric's one regardless of configuring yarn.app.mapreduce.am.env and mapreduce.admin.user.env... does anyone hit same error? 2016-09-02 16:49:35,223 INFO mapreduce.Job: The url to track the job:

Re: [DISCUSS] Release numbering semantics with concurrent (>2) releases [Was Setting JIRA fix versions for 3.0.0 releases]

n a 2.7.x. > > Best, > Andrew > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Andrew: I bet many would assume it's the release date, like how Ubuntu >> > releases are numbered. >> >> Good point. Maybe I

Re: [DISCUSS] Release numbering semantics with concurrent (>2) releases [Was Setting JIRA fix versions for 3.0.0 releases]

> Andrew: I bet many would assume it's the release date, like how Ubuntu releases are numbered. Good point. Maybe I confuse you because of lack of explanation. I assume that "branch-cut off timing" mean the timing of freezing branch like when starting the release vote. It's because that the

[DISCUSS] The order of classpath isolation work and updating/shading dependencies on trunk

Hi developers, I'd like to discuss how to make an advance towards dependency management in Apache Hadoop trunk code since there has been lots work about updating dependencies in parallel. Summarizing recent works and activities as follows: 0) Currently, we have merged minimum update dependencies

Re: [DICUSS] Upgrading Guice to 4.0(HADOOP-12064)

rade work Tsuyoshi! > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks, Andrew. >> >> Based on discussion here, I would like to merge it into *trunk* if >> there are no objection tomorrow. >> >> Thanks, &g

Re: [DICUSS] Upgrading Guice to 4.0(HADOOP-12064)

in trunk. > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> I forgot to mention about importance point: it's a blocker issue to >> compile Hadoop with JDK8. Hence, we need to merge it on both client >> side and server slide anyway. >

Re: [DICUSS] Upgrading Guice to 4.0(HADOOP-12064)

I forgot to mention about importance point: it's a blocker issue to compile Hadoop with JDK8. Hence, we need to merge it on both client side and server slide anyway. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Vinod, Sang

Re: [DICUSS] Upgrading Guice to 4.0(HADOOP-12064)

; Assuming classpath isolation gets in, it is reasonable to bump up our >> > dependencies like Jetty / Guice to the latest stable versions. >> > >> > Thanks >> > +Vinod >> > >> >> On Jun 27, 2016, at 6:01 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> w

Re: [DICUSS] Upgrading Guice to 4.0(HADOOP-12064)

No objections here? - Tsuyoshi On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi developers, > > I will plan to upgrade Google Guice dependency on trunk. The change > also includes asm and cglib upgrade. > I checked following points: > > *

[DICUSS] Upgrading Guice to 4.0(HADOOP-12064)

Hi developers, I will plan to upgrade Google Guice dependency on trunk. The change also includes asm and cglib upgrade. I checked following points: * Both HDFS and YARN UIs work well. * All webIU-related tests pass as described on HADOOP-12064. * Ran mapreduce job, and it works well.

Re: Failure to submit job on trunk hadoop cluster

hith Sharma K S > > > -Original Message- > From: Tsuyoshi Ozawa [mailto:oz...@apache.org] > Sent: 27 June 2016 16:10 > To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; > mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Failure to submit job on trunk hadoop cluster

Failure to submit job on trunk hadoop cluster

Hi, Have anyone tried to submit jobs on trunk cluster? I failed to launch jobs by class not found error with following error messages. Should I change environment variables to setup from branch-2's one? I'm using the same configuration as Hadoop 2 can run. $ hadoop jar

Re: Hadoop CI with alternate architectures.

Hi Asanjar, Thanks for your contribution! I'm ashamed to say, but I don't know how to change the build machine. Adding "to" Allen, who is a PMC of Yetus project. Hey Allen, do you know how to add Power based Jenkins slave(s) to Apache Hadoop CI? Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:18

Re: [DISCUSS] Set minimum version of Hadoop 3 to JDK8 (HADOOP-11858)

> Before cutting 3.0.0-alpha RC, I'd like to drop JDK7 support in trunk. Sounds good. To do so, we need to check the blockers of 3.0.0-alpha RC, especially upgrading all dependencies which use refractions at first. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Akira AJISAKA

[DISCUSS] Merge Jersey upgrade(HADOOP-9613) to trunk

Hi developers, We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for a years. It's essential change to support complication with JDK8. It’s almost there. One concern to merge this to trunk is incompatibility. After the release of Jersey 1.13, the root element whose content is empty collection is

Slack channel for Hadoop developers

Hi, I created slack channel for Hadoop community unofficially and experimentally: https://hadoopdev.slack.com/ I know that there is IRC channel and it's good to log. However, Slack is very also good tool to join easily and have a communication interactively. It will be also useful to join

Re: PreCommit-MAPREDUCE Jenkins Job is broken?

Hi Robert, Thank you for taking the issue. Does the Jenkins slave have enough disk space? - Tsuyoshi On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Robert Kanter wrote: > Hi all, > > I was trying to manually kick off a the PreCommit-MAPREDUCE job for > MAPREDUCE-6622 because it wasn't

[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-6641) TestTaskAttempt fails in trunk

Tsuyoshi Ozawa created MAPREDUCE-6641: - Summary: TestTaskAttempt fails in trunk Key: MAPREDUCE-6641 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6641 Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce

Re: MAPREDUCE-6520 and MAPREDUCE-6543 review request

Thanks Karthik and Dustin for pinging me. Yeah, I'll take a look at the tickets. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Dustin Cote wrote: > Thanks Karthik! Yes, I will try reaching out to Tsuyoshi directly on these > two. I appreciate the nudge in the right

[jira] [Resolved] (MAPREDUCE-6341) Fix typo in mapreduce tutorial

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsuyoshi Ozawa resolved MAPREDUCE-6341. --- Resolution: Fixed Committed addendum patch to trunk, branch-2, branch-2.8. Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.4 RC0

+1(binding) - Verified signatures. - Ran tests for Apache Tez with the artifacts. All tests passed. - Ran local cluster and ran some examples on it. - Tsuyoshi On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Sunil Govind wrote: > +1 (non-binding) with one note, > > - Installed tar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC2

+1 (binding) - Verified checksum. - Built from source code. - Ran some tests and mr examples. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: > Hi all, > > I've created an updated release candidate RC2 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.2. > > As

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC1

Hi Vinod, thank you for the clarification. > - Pull these 16 tickets into 2.7.2 and roll a new RC > > What do people think? Do folks expect “any fix in 2.6.3 to be there in all > > releases that get out after 2.6.3 release date (December 16th)”? I personally prefer to pull these tickets into

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC1

+1 - downloaded src and bin tar balls and verified signatures. - built Tez and Spark with 2.7.2 artifacts and JDK7. - ran tests of Tez with 2.7.2 artifacts, it passed. FYI: YARN-4348, reported by Jian, is one of critical issues of 2.7.2 release.It's better to release 2.7.3 as soon as possible

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0

+1 (binding) - verified checksums - built Spark and Tez with -Dhadoop.version=2.6.3. About Tez, ran tests and all of them passed. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - downloaded source and binary and verified the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0

Hi Junping, Thank you for starting the voting. I cannot access the tar.gz file because of permission error. Could you check the permission to access the files? > Forbidden > You don't have permission to access > /~junping_du/hadoop-2.6.3-RC0/hadoop-2.6.3-RC0-src.tar.gz on this server. Thanks,

Re: Jenkins stability and patching

Thank you for starting discussion, Steve. It sounds good to me. I'll check the test failures. - Tsuyoshi On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > Jenkins is pretty much dead in the water these days; a test run that works is > a rare miracle rather

Re: 2.7.2 release plan

fixes as > > quickly as possible, and they don't bear the same risk of regressions or > > incompatibilities as code changes. > > > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > > > > > > On 7/16/15, 12:38 AM, "Tsuyoshi Ozawa" <oz...@apache.org <jav

Re: Planning for Apache Hadoop 2.6.2

Done. - Tsuyoshi On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for your notification, Sangjin. I'll backport YARN-3798 soon. > > - Tsuyoshi > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org> wrote: >> If you

Re: Planning for Apache Hadoop 2.6.2

Thanks for your notification, Sangjin. I'll backport YARN-3798 soon. - Tsuyoshi On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote: > If you have backported bugfixes to 2.7.2, please take a moment to consider > if it is relevant (and important) for 2.6.x too, and if so

Re: [DISCUSS] About the details of JDK-8 support

> We should target source-level support of JDK 8 too, around which you outlined > a bunch of issues around dependencies. I also found a bunch of issues around > generating documentation, site etc. I propose that we track them under the > umbrella JIRA and make progress there first. OK. I will

Re: [DISCUSS] About the details of JDK-8 support

t;> >> > On 7 Oct 2015, at 22:39, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> >> Do you have any concern about this? I’ve not >> >> tested with HBas

Re: [DISCUSS] About the details of JDK-8 support

Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi commiters and users of Hadoop stack, > > I’ll share the current status of JDK-8 support here. We can take a > two-step approach to support JDK-8 - runtime-level support and > source-level support. > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1

+1 (non-binding) 1. Built from source. 2. Verified signature of bin tar ball and source tar ball. 3. Running some examples. 4. Running Spark on YARN with spark-shell. It works well. I think 4 verifies compatibility is preserved. Thanks everyone for working to release 2.6.1. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi

Re: 2.7.2 release plan

Hi, thank you for starting the discussion about 2.7.2 release. The focus obviously is to have blocker issues [2], bug-fixes and *no* features / improvements. I've committed YARN-3170, which is an improvement of documentation. I thought documentation pages which can be fit into branch-2.7 can

Re: IMPORTANT: automatic changelog creation

+1, thanks Allen and Andrew for taking lots effort! Is there any possibility that, we can restrict someone from editing the issue in jira once its marked as closed after release? Vinay's comment looks considerable for us to me. What do you think? - Tsuyoshi On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:57 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.1 RC0

Thank you for starting voting, Vinod. I tried to untar the tarball, but the command exited with an error. Is binary tarball broken? $ tar xzvf hadoop-2.7.1-RC0.tar.gz ... hadoop-2.7.1/share/hadoop/httpfs/tomcat/webapps/webhdfs/WEB-INF/lib/hadoop-common-2.7.1.jar gzip: stdin: unexpected end of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.1 RC0

(GNU tar) 1.23 uname -a Linux a.com 2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 15 04:27:16 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I was able to expand the tarball. Can you use another machine ? Cheers On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa oz...@apache.org wrote: Thank you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

Hey Akira, could you target the issues to 2.7.1? Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Akira AJISAKA ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote: +0 (non-binding) - Downloaded source - Built from source - Ran a pseudo-distributed cluster - Read documents downloaded from binary tarball

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0

+1 (non-binding) - Verified checksums on source and binary tar ball. - Built from source and launched single cluster. - Checked to launch some jobs successfully. - Killing application via RM UI. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Junping Du j...@hortonworks.com wrote: +1.

Re: Save the Date: Apache Hadoop Bug Bash / May 8th!

Hi Allen, Thank you for the great suggestion. Let's do this! Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Allen Wittenauer a...@altiscale.com wrote: Hi folks, There are ~6,000 Hadoop JIRA issues that have gone unaddressed, including ~900 with patches waiting to be reviewed.

[jira] [Resolved] (MAPREDUCE-6268) Fix typo in Task Attempt API's URL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsuyoshi Ozawa resolved MAPREDUCE-6268. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.7.0 Target Version/s: 2.7.0

Re: 2.7 status

Allen and Steve, Should we mark HADOOP-11602 as a blocker issue? Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:58 AM, Arun Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Sounds good, thanks for the help Vinod! Arun From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Sent: Sunday,

TimSort bug and its workaround

Hi hadoop developers, Last 2 weeks, a bug of JDK about TimSort, related to Collections#sort, is reported. How can we deal with this problem? http://envisage-project.eu/timsort-specification-and-verification/ https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8072909 The bug causes

Re: TimSort bug and its workaround

for stability. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa oz...@apache.org wrote: Hi hadoop developers, Last 2 weeks, a bug of JDK about TimSort, related to Collections#sort, is reported. How can we deal with this problem? http://envisage-project.eu/timsort

Re: wordcount program error!

Please remove the output directory you specified: hdfs dfs -rm -r wordcountout Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Nada Saif nada.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tsuyoshi, I doubled check ,the wordcoutout folder is empty!? Regards On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Tsuyoshi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0

+0(non-binding) HDFS-6833 is critical issue for us - could you help us to merge it into 2.6? Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) Built Hadoop from source, compiled Tez against the hadoop jars pushed to staging repo and ran a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0

with replication factor 3), we should perhaps target this into 2.6.1 and not block this release. Thoughts? On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com wrote: +0(non-binding) HDFS-6833 is critical issue for us - could you help us to merge it into 2.6? Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0

Hi Arun, Could you confirm the link and permission to the files is correct? I got a following error: Forbidden You don't have permission to access /~acmurthy/hadoop-2.6.0-rc0/hadoop-2.6.0-src.tar.gz on this server. On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:

[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-6120) TestPipeApplication fails on trunk

Tsuyoshi OZAWA created MAPREDUCE-6120: - Summary: TestPipeApplication fails on trunk Key: MAPREDUCE-6120 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6120 Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce

[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-6079) Renaming JobImpl#username to reporterUserName

Tsuyoshi OZAWA created MAPREDUCE-6079: - Summary: Renaming JobImpl#username to reporterUserName Key: MAPREDUCE-6079 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6079 Project: Hadoop Map

[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-6073) Description of mapreduce.job.speculative.slowtaskthreshold in mapred-default should be moved into description tags

Tsuyoshi OZAWA created MAPREDUCE-6073: - Summary: Description of mapreduce.job.speculative.slowtaskthreshold in mapred-default should be moved into description tags Key: MAPREDUCE-6073 URL: https

Re: Advice on hadoop's eventing system.

Hi, How about using REST APIs to get the information instead of hacking MapReduce itself if you're using Hadoop 2? http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.4.1/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/WebServicesIntro.html Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Chris Hinshaw chris.hins...@gmail.com

Re: Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 published tarballs are missing some txt files

Hi, Thanks Karthik for preparing new tar ball. Verified MD5, SHA1, SHA224, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512 checksums. It looks good to me. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi devs Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 RC2

, signature and checksum are untouched. On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for dealing with this problem, Karthik. It sounds reasonable to me to update binary tarball without modifying source code. +1(non-binding) to continue the voting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 RC2

-1 (non-binding). * Downloaded source and verified signature. * Built from source. * Ran tests and some MR jobs. * Ran RM-HA with manual failover mode. - Documents are missing. Good catch, Akira. As he mentioned, the documents including javadocs are missing from the binary tar ball. We should

Re: [VOTE] Migration from subversion to git for version control

+1(non-binding) Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com wrote: I have put together this proposal based on recent discussion on this topic. Please vote on the proposal. The vote runs for 7 days. 1. Migrate from subversion to git for version

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 RC2

the source. Thanks Karthik On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com wrote: -1 (non-binding). * Downloaded source and verified signature. * Built from source. * Ran tests and some MR jobs. * Ran RM-HA with manual failover mode. - Documents are missing

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate from svn to git for source control?

Thank you for great suggestion, Karthik. +1(non-binding) to use git. I'm also using private git repository. Additionally, I have one question. Will we accept github-based development like Apache Spark? IHMO, it allow us to leverage Hadoop development, because the cost of sending pull request is

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate from svn to git for source control?

definitely opens up the possibility for better review workflows, but we can discuss that on a different thread. A few different people have also mentioned Gerrit, so that'd be in the running along with Github (and I guess ReviewBoard). Thanks, Andrew On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Tsuyoshi

Re: [DISCUSS] Assume Private-Unstable for classes that are not annotated

+1 for Karthik's suggestion. - Tsuyoshi On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi devs As you might have noticed, we have several classes and methods in them that are not annotated at all. This is seldom intentional. Avoiding incompatible changes to all

Re: Branching 2.5

Hi Wangda, The following link is same link as Karthik mentioned:

Re: [VOTE] Change by-laws on release votes: 5 days instead of 7

+1(non-binding) On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) — Hitesh On Jun 24, 2014, at 1:53 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Folks, As discussed, I'd like to call a vote on changing our by-laws to change release votes from 7 days to

Re: hadoop-2.5 - June end?

IMHO, I'd like to +1 to include YARN-1492 and work-preserving restart in 2.6. I believe they are good improvement, but they are work-in-progress and it takes a bit time to be done. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Jian He j...@hortonworks.com wrote: Just found the roadmap

Re: hadoop-2.5 - June end?

IMHO, it's useful to release 2.5 as intermediate release. The working items which are not ready for 2.5 will be target for 2.6, right? Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:03 PM, dlmar...@comcast.net wrote: Arun, Any possibility of getting HDFS-6376 committed and backported into

Re: Policy on adding timeouts to tests

Hi Karthik, Some tests with servers like MiniCluster or ZK can never end because of unexpected busy loop or something if the tests don't have timeouts. It can blocks the other jobs of Jenkins server. Therefore, IMHO, we should add timeouts when we write tests with them. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On

Re: Thinking ahead

Hi, +1 for 2.4.1 release(non-binding). There are some critical issues including YARN-1861 and YARN-1929 about RM-HA. IMO, we should include the fixes. One question is whether we can include RM-HA phase 2(YARN-556) in 2.5 by mid-May. It's still work-in-progress. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Mon, Apr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.4.0

Hi Arun, I apologize for the late response. If the problems are recognized correctly, +1 for the release(non-binding). * Ran examples on pseudo distributed cluster. * Ran tests. * Built from source. Let's fix the problems at the target version(2.4.1). Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Wed, Apr 9, 2014

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.4.0

Azurry, can you file the RM-failover related bug as a JIRA? I'm going to reproduce it in my local. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Azuryy azury...@gmail.com wrote: Did you tested RM failover on Hive? There is bug. Sent from my iPhone5s On 2014年4月4日, at 2:12, Xuan Gong

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.4.0

Hi, Ran tests and confirmed that some tests(TestSymlinkLocalFSFileSystem) fail. The log of the test failure is as follows: https://gist.github.com/oza/9965197 Should we fix or disable the feature? Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.3.0

+1 (non-binding) * Built from source. * Ran a pseudo-cluster with manual RM HA. * Ran a few MR examples as tests. Thanks, Tsuyoshi On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Folks, I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.3.0 that I would like to

Re: The code for the Shuffle phase of MapReduce

Hi Pramod, In addition to shuffle plugin related parts, please check out how spill works in MapTask.java and how reducer fetches MapOutputs from mappers. Thanks, Tsuyoshi On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Pramod Biligiri pramodbilig...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm beginning to look at the code for

Re: Looking for a resource about measuring MapReduce performance

Hi Pramod, Now PUMA benchmarks are available at the following site: https://sites.google.com/site/farazahmad/pumabenchmarks Thanks, Tsuyoshi On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Pramod Biligiri pramodbilig...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tian, Thanks for that link to PUMA. It's proving useful for us in

[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-5755) MapTask.MapOutputBuffer#compare/swap should have @Override annotations

Tsuyoshi OZAWA created MAPREDUCE-5755: - Summary: MapTask.MapOutputBuffer#compare/swap should have @Override annotations Key: MAPREDUCE-5755 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5755

[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-5623) NonAggregatingLogHandler can throw RejectedExecutionException

Tsuyoshi OZAWA created MAPREDUCE-5623: - Summary: NonAggregatingLogHandler can throw RejectedExecutionException Key: MAPREDUCE-5623 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5623

Re: release-2.2.0 tag?

Hi Mohammad, IIUC, 2.2.0 is the latest released version. branch-2.2 is the latest branch under development. On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Mohammad Islam misla...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I could not find out any release tag for 2.2.0. Which branch should I use instead for latest released

Re: Managing docs with hadoop-1 hadoop-2

# Have stable1/stable2 links: http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable1 - hadoop-1.x http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable2 - hadoop-2.x +1, would also make: current - stable2(since v2 is the latest) stable - stable1 (for compatibility) +1, Eli's proposal looks good to me. -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

I don't have Windows environment, but one user who tried 2.2.0 release on Windows reported that released tar ball doesn't contain winutil.exe and cannot run any commands. Thanks, Tsuyoshi On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats! On Tue, Oct 15

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

Filed the problems as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10051. On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com wrote: I don't have Windows environment, but one user who tried 2.2.0 release on Windows reported that released tar ball doesn't contain

Re: How to modify the Map-Reduce execution order?

Hi Anh, How about using ChainMapper? Is the helpful for you? http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/api/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/lib/ChainMapper.html Thanks, Tsuyoshi On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Anh Pham pham3...@gmail.com wrote: (Please correct me if I am wrong) So the original chain is:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

Congrats! On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Congrats bros! ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

+1 (non-binding) - Verified md5 checksums and signature. - Build from source, and run some example MR jobs in single node setup. On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Siddharth Seth ss...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) Verified checksums and signature. Built from source and ran some simple MR and

Re: [ACTION NEEDED]: protoc 2.5.0 in trunk/branch-2/branch-2.1-beta/branch-2.1.0-beta

Thanks for sharing! We also need to update Wiki or some documents, don't we? http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote: Following up on this. HADOOP-9845 HADOOP-9872 have been committed to

Re: Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845

Hi, About Hadoop, Harsh is dealing with this problem in HADOOP-9346. For more detail, please see the JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9346 - Tsuyoshi On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote: I' like to upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.1.0-beta

+1 (non-binding) * verified md5 of the source code. * build the package from source code. * run basic hdfs commands. * run MapReduce example jobs(random text writer, wordcount, and pi) over YARN in single node. - Tsuyoshi On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com

[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-5443) ClientId should have getMsb/getLsb methods

Tsuyoshi OZAWA created MAPREDUCE-5443: - Summary: ClientId should have getMsb/getLsb methods Key: MAPREDUCE-5443 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5443 Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce

[jira] [Resolved] (MAPREDUCE-5443) ClientId should have getMsb/getLsb methods

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tsuyoshi OZAWA resolved MAPREDUCE-5443. --- Resolution: Invalid Release Note: Moved to HADOOP-9821, and close

Re: Abstraction layer to support both YARN and Mesos

specifically? At what times would one prefer the other? On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Now, Apache Mesos, an distributed resource manager, is top-level apache project. Meanwhile, As you know, Hadoop has own resource manager - YARN. IMHO, we

Re: Abstraction layer to support both YARN and Mesos

be confusing. Its very easy for a good technology to get starved because no one asks how to combine these features in to the framework. On Jul 29, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com wrote: I thought some high availability and resource isolation features in Mesos are more

Abstraction layer to support both YARN and Mesos

Hi, Now, Apache Mesos, an distributed resource manager, is top-level apache project. Meanwhile, As you know, Hadoop has own resource manager - YARN. IMHO, we should make resource manager pluggable in MRv2, because there are their own field users of MapReduce would like to use. I think this work

Request for reviewing MAPREDUCE-4502(Node-level combiner)

Hi, I've suggested and created a patch for node-level aggregation(MAPREDUCE-4502). This patch is now ready for review by anyone. The design doc is also available for review at JIRA[1]. Aggregation jobs with Hadoop are very common, so this work can achieve better experience with Hadoop. [1]

  1   2   >