Good deal, thanks.
PS- Haven't forgotten about MALLOC stuff- just lower on priority list at the
moment. More to come.
On 9/22/11 2:32 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote:
> Priorities are within you application.
>
> You always get P0 containers before you get P1 containers and so on
>
> Arun
>
>
Priorities are within you application.
You always get P0 containers before you get P1 containers and so on
Arun
On Sep 22, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Chris Riccomini wrote:
> Hey Arun,
>
> I think I see. Basically, 2646's patch is using the priority number as an ID
> for a container (or group of co
Hey Arun,
I think I see. Basically, 2646's patch is using the priority number as an ID
for a container (or group of containers) within an AllocateRequest.
So, in my scenario, I could set ResourceRequest 1 to priority 1, and
ResourceRequest 2 to priority 2, and (with this patch) get the priority b
Also, for now you can assume it's the highest outstanding priority or wait for
MR-2646.
On Sep 22, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Chris Riccomini wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I’m sure there’s a way to do this, but I’m missing it.
>
> If I have an AllocateRequest with multiple ResourceRequests in it (say 2),
> a
Oops, sorry - it's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2646
Arun
On Sep 22, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Chris Riccomini wrote:
> Hey Arun,
>
> MR-2616 looks like a gridmix bug. Are you sure this is the right ticket
> number?
>
> Thanks!
> Chris
>
>
> On 9/22/11 2:04 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wr
Hey Arun,
MR-2616 looks like a gridmix bug. Are you sure this is the right ticket
number?
Thanks!
Chris
On 9/22/11 2:04 PM, "Arun C Murthy" wrote:
> You are running into MR-2616.
>
> There is a stale patch, should be easy to fix - I can do it, you are welcome
> to.
>
> Arun
>
> On Sep 22,
You are running into MR-2616.
There is a stale patch, should be easy to fix - I can do it, you are welcome to.
Arun
On Sep 22, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Chris Riccomini wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I’m sure there’s a way to do this, but I’m missing it.
>
> If I have an AllocateRequest with multiple Resourc
