On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Having a strict policy leads to all sorts of further dialogues and issues we
> could do well without.
+1
Can anyone remember why we vote on release plans? -C
I am not sure what was your point here. You seem to be assuming things I
never mentioned.
I am arguing against invasive and destructive features proposed for the
release.
Just to remind here they are again, since the history has been wiped out.
# Snapshots
# NFS gateway for HDFS
# HDFS-347 unix d
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> Can anyone remember why we vote on release plans? -C
To vote on features to include in the release.
Thanks,
--Konstantin
Konstantin,
On May 2, 2013, at 2:08 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
> I am arguing against invasive and destructive features proposed for the
> release.
> Just to remind here they are again, since the history has been wiped out.
>
> # Snapshots
> # NFS gateway for HDFS
> # HDFS-347 unix domain so
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Konstantin Shvachko
wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>> Can anyone remember why we vote on release plans? -C
>
> To vote on features to include in the release.
Since most features are developed in branches (requiring a merge
vote), ea
