Apache Hadoop 2.8.3 Release Plan

Hi, We have several important fixes get landed on branch-2.8 and I would like to cut off branch-2.8.3 now to start 2.8.3 release work. So far, I don't see any pending blockers on 2.8.3, so my current plan is to cut off 1st RC of 2.8.3 in next several days: - For all coming

Re: [DISCUSS] A final minor release off branch-2?

Thanks Vinod for staring this, I'm also leaning towards the plan (A): * (A)-- Make 2.9.x the last minor release off branch-2-- Have a maintenance release that bridges 2.9 to 3.x-- Continue to make more maintenance releases on 2.8 and 2.9 as necessary* The only part I'm not sure

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.9.0 (RC2)

I have no issues now that RC3 is rolling. Thanks for the quick actions. My point is I'm not sure that's even required. MIT licenses standard format has that copyright line https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License, and combined with the licensing-howto I referred earlier, HADOOP-15036 is not

[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.9.0 (RC3)

Hi Folks, Apache Hadoop 2.9.0 is the first release of Hadoop 2.9 line and will be the starting release for Apache Hadoop 2.9.x line - it includes 30 New Features with 500+ subtasks, 407 Improvements, 790 Bug fixes new fixed issues since 2.8.2. More information about the 2.9.0 release plan can be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.9.0 (RC2)

Cancelling the RC2 to fix the LICENSE.txt issue. Will be rolling out an RC3 shortly. Given that the delta is just the LICENSE fix, we will be carrying over the votes from this thread as well. Cheers -Arun/Subru On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Arun Suresh wrote: > Hi Xiao,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.9.0 (RC2)

Hi Xiao, What Anu pointed out was that the copyright was missing in the LICENCE not notice. Don't think we need to file LEGAL, since what we are doing is similar to the other MIT dependencies. Cheers -Arun On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Xiao Chen wrote: > Thanks guys for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.9.0 (RC2)

Thanks guys for pulling the RC and prompt reviews. >From previous L discussions and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.9.0 (RC2)

Thanks for notifying Anu, We've raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15036 to address this and have included a patch. Can you please take a look and possibly +1 if you are fine ? Cheers -Arun On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Anu Engineer wrote: > -1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.9.0 (RC2)

-1 (binding) Thank you for all the hard work on 2.9 series. Unfortunately, this is one of the times I have to -1 this release. Looks like HADOOP-14840 added a dependency on “oj! Algorithms - version 43.0”, but we have just added “oj! Algorithms - version 43.0” to the “LICENSE.txt”. The right

[jira] [Resolved] (MAPREDUCE-7006) mapreduce.application.framework.path localizes into the private directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Miklos Szegedi resolved MAPREDUCE-7006. --- Resolution: Not A Problem > mapreduce.application.framework.path localizes into

[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-7007) Add LOG.isDebugEnabled() guard for each LOG.debug()

Mehran Hassani created MAPREDUCE-7007: - Summary: Add LOG.isDebugEnabled() guard for each LOG.debug() Key: MAPREDUCE-7007 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7007 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-7006) mapreduce.application.framework.path localizes into the private directory

Miklos Szegedi created MAPREDUCE-7006: - Summary: mapreduce.application.framework.path localizes into the private directory Key: MAPREDUCE-7006 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7006

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.9.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Deployed cluster built from source. - Tested few cases in an HA cluster and tried to do failover by using rmadmin commands etc. This seems works fine including submitting apps. - I also tested many MR apps and all are running fine w/o any issues. - Majorly tested below