+1 (binding)
Arun
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:44 PM -0700, "Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli"
mailto:vino...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi all,
I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
The RC tag in git is: r
Ok, I'll spin rc1 after. Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 10, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Siddharth Seth wrote:
> Arun, MAPREDUCE-5094 would be a useful jira to include in the 2.0.4-alpha
> release. It's not an absolute blocker since the values can be controlled
> explicitly by changing tests which us
That makes sense too.
On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
wrote:
>
> We need to make a call on what blockers will be. From my limited
> understanding, this doesn't seem like a API or a compatibility issue. Can we
> not fix it in subsequent bug-fix releases?
>
> I do see a lo
Based on the discussion at common-dev@, we've decided to target 2.3
off the tip of branch-2 based on the 2 major HDFS features which are
Heterogenous Storage (HDFS-2832) and HDFS Cache (HDFS-4949).
I'll create a new branch-2.3 on (1/24) at 6pm PST.
thanks,
Arun
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE:
Akira,
Waiting for one more issue, stay tuned.
thanks,
Arun
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Akira AJISAKA
wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> I'd like to know when to release Hadoop 2.4.1.
> It looks like all of the blockers have been resolved.
>
> Thanks,
> Akira
>
>
> (2014/04/24 5:59), Arun C Murthy w
Thanks everyone. I'll start a vote tmrw if there are no objections.
Arun
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jitendra Pandey
wrote:
> +1, sounds good!
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Andrew Wang
> wrote:
>
> > +1 here as well, let's do a vote thread (for 7 days, maybe for the last
> > t
Alejandro,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur
wrote:
> After reading this thread and thinking a bit about it, I think it should be
> OK such move up to JDK7 in Hadoop 2 for the following reasons:
>
> * Existing Hadoop 2 releases and related projects are running
> on JDK7 in p
I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather than fix
existing tarballs.
thanks,
Arun
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla
wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the to
Chris,
I think you really can use the events via the YARN Timeline Server:
http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-site/TimelineServer.html
Many YARN applications (MR, Tez, Spark soon) will emit events to the
Timeline Server.
hth,
Arun
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:48 AM,
Sorry, coming to discussion late.
We all agreed that 2.6 would the *last* release supporting JDK6 and
hadoop-2.7 would drop support for JDK6. We could easily do 2.7 right after
2.6 (maybe with few critical bug-fixes) with the defining feature of 2.7
being *JDK7 only*. I've checked with HBase, Pig
Looks like most of the content is in and hadoop-2.6 is shaping up nicely.
I'll create branch-2.6 by end of the week and we can go from there to
stabilize it - hopefully in the next few weeks.
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> With hadoo
as already indicated
>> on
>>>>> the dev mailing list. Hopefully HDFS-6581 gets ready sooner. Both of
>>> these
>>>>> features are being in development for sometime.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Andrew Wang <
>
Duh!
$ chmod a+r *
Please try now. Thanks!
Arun
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA
wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> Could you confirm the link and permission to the files is correct? I
> got a following error:
>
>
> Forbidden
> You don't have permission to access
> /~acmurthy/hadoop-2.6.0-
Folks,
With hadoop-2.6 out it's time to think ahead.
As we've discussed in the past, 2.6 was the last release which supports JDK6.
I'm thinking it's best to try get 2.7 out in a few weeks (maybe by the
holidays) with just the switch to JDK7 (HADOOP-10530) and possibly
support for JDK-1.8 (as a r
My bad, been sorted distracted.
I agree, we should just roll fwd a 2.7 ASAP with all the goodies.
What sort of timing makes sense? 2 week hence?
thanks,
Arun
From: Jason Lowe
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:11 AM
To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subje
Sounds good, thanks for the help Vinod!
Arun
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 11:43 AM
To: Hadoop Common; Jason Lowe; Arun Murthy
Subject: Re: 2.7 status
Agreed. How about we roll an RC end of this week? As a Java 7+ release
Andrew,
Thanks for bringing up this discussion.
I'm a little puzzled for I feel like we are rehashing the same discussion from
last year - where we agreed on a different course of action w.r.t switch to
JDK7.
IAC, breaking compatibility for hadoop-3 is a pretty big cost - particularly
for
Awesome, looks like we can just do this in a compatible manner - nothing else
on the list seems like it warrants a (premature) major release.
Thanks Vinod.
Arun
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:30 PM
To: common-...@hadoop.ap
Over the last few days, we have had lots of discussions that have intertwined
several major themes:
# When/why do we make major Hadoop releases?
# When/how do we move to major JDK versions?
# To a lesser extent, we have debated another theme: what do we do about trunk?
For now, let's park
Steve,
From: Steve Loughran
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 2:15 PM
To: mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
common-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Hadoop 3.x: what about shipping trunk as a 2.x release in 2
Colin,
Do you have a list of incompatible changes other than the shell-script
rewrite? If we do have others we'd have to fix them anyway for the current plan
on hadoop-3.x right? So, I don't see the difference?
Arun
From: Colin P. McCabe
Sent: Monday,
Yuri,
Do you have the stack trace?
Pls file a jira. Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 13, 2011, at 7:44 PM, y...@isi.edu wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm running common/hdfs/mapreduce trunk version
> -r1146503; I'm getting the following error at the reduce phase:
>
> Error: tried to access class
Moving to mapreduce-dev@, bcc general@.
Yes, as described in the bug, the CS has high-ram jobs which is a
better model for shared multi-tenant clusters. The hadoop-0.20.203
release from Apache has the most current and tested version of the
CapacityScheduler.
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 22,
Pls open a jira and file the patch. Thanks!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 22, 2011, at 6:56 PM, sp yu wrote:
> I've recently using hadoop*(version 0.21.0)* for some data processing, but
> sometimes reducer crashed. Always the log is like bellow(at the end of this
> mail), which tells when multi fe
That means you don't have the autotool chain necessary for build the
native code.
For now pass -P-cbuild to skip them.
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 18, 2011, at 11:26 PM, rajesh putta wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using apache-maven-3.0.3 and i have set LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
> which has goo
You need to run 'mvn install' first to get MR2 installed first. Use
-P-cbuild to skip the LTC build.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 31, 2011, at 7:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> How do you build the old MR code nowadays?
>
> The wiki suggests using ant -Dresolvers=internal veryclean test in
> hadoop-m
This is secure mode or unsecured? Cluster or single node? Tx
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 23, 2011, at 8:37 AM, Ravi Prakash wrote:
> Hi Arun/Vinod,
>
> After commit d4dca4eabf83a97d158f1e1caa4801020679d5e2
> Date: Wed Sep 21 18:52:27 2011 +
> MAPREDUCE-2880. svn merge -c r1173783 --ignore-
Try blowing away your ivy cache?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 15, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> Running 'ant examples -Dresolvers=internal' from trunk fails with.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alejandro
>
> --
> compile-mapred-classes:
> [jsp-compile] log4j:WARN No appenders
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
>
>> Hey All,
>>
>> Two questions about the MR2 scheduler code, for anyone more familiar.
>>
>> - The return type of allocate() suggests that the AM will get some
>> instantaneous allocation of resources. Reading through the two current
>>
Praveen,
There are many ways to prevent what you described...
I'm in the process of adding more docs, for now pls take a look at the
following older blog post for more details:
http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/hadoop/posts/2011/03/mapreduce-nextgen-scheduler/
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 2
Sounds great! Thanks for the update Ralph!
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 20, 2011, at 10:22 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Just a quick update on this notion. Several of us in the OMPI community got
> together and successfully integrated Java bindings into the OMPI code base,
> and we have enough su
31 matches
Mail list logo
