Hello Rahkonen,
Thanks for answering so quickly. I had already proved that, but I had
obtained a warning in the GetCapabilities request and I didn't have
realized that it was working.
Do you know how I can solve the warning?:
Layer
Namegroup/Name
!-- WARNING: Mandatory metadata
Sebastian E. Ovide wrote:
Is it possible define an order on how the polygons are drawn ? Say for
example to draw the polygons with field RISK 0 first, then with RISK
=1 and so on...
I know that using PG we can use Select * from XXX order by RISK
Is there any way to do that using
The only way I know of is to use the sortshp utility.
http://mapserver.org/utilities/sortshp.html
Best regards,
Bart
Hi All,
Reading a shapefile (ESRI/MapInfo) from FS with polygons overlapping. Each
polygon is drawn with a different color based on a field called RISK.
Is it possible
Hi All,
Reading a shapefile (ESRI/MapInfo) from FS with polygons overlapping. Each
polygon is drawn with a different color based on a field called RISK.
Is it possible define an order on how the polygons are drawn ? Say for
example to draw the polygons with field RISK 0 first, then with RISK =1
Hi,
Sortshp can order data only by one attribute. If that is not enough you
can sort shapefile by two or more attributes with ogr2ogr by giving
ORDER BY inside the -sql parameter. Of course it is possible to split
the shapefile into several layers by using FILTER. In that case the
drawing order
Actually EXPRESSIONs can handle regex too:
CLASSITEM ‘tag’
CLASS
EXPRESSION /^TVOP2/
…
END
This catches all tag’s that begin with the pattern TVOP2. You might want to do
a FILTER instead if this is the ONLY filter you need to apply. You’d see a
small performance boost if that were the
Matt,
It looks like Steve Lime's regular expression example will get you what you are
looking for.
One strategy to think about with MapServer (and any other Web map server) is
that when you are looking for the best performance, you want to pre-process
your data as much as possible. This
Wow
Thanks guys, these where great examples, I got there straight away.
Thanks for the advice on performance. This may become an issue, and sounds
like it is better to deal with it early.
This is a very powerful tool, with a great community base, I am very
impressed
Now of the fun part, making
Hi,
Have a try with EPSG:4326 and you should see a difference. Despite of axes
flipping with some projections there should really not be any difference in the
GetMap output - image is an image. Do GetCapabilities and you should see
difference. I am remembering also that VERSION is a compulsory
Hello Yves,
Some related thoughts:
- related ticket for configuring default WMS version:
http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/3444 ...please add yourself to
the CC list of that ticket and join in the discussions and testing and
feedback, thanks
- doc pointers:
Dear Friends,
I am newbie to UMN MapServer and with the knowledge gained through the
forum, I designed WebGIS for Ocean Data and Information System.
I am herewith providing the link for the same. Please go through and suggest
your valuable opinions, for improvement if any.
11 matches
Mail list logo
