Hello thomas,
thomas bonfort thomas.bonf...@gmail.com, [20110128 - 08:23:31]
Before starting to implement something extensive around label
BACKGROUNDCOLOR, you should be aware that this keyword will not be
supported anymore starting from version 6.0.
it is replaced with a
STYLE
allow to completely remove the need for ANNOTATION
layers.
regards,
thomas
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:22, Stephan Holl stephan.h...@intevation.de wrote:
Hello thomas,
thomas bonfort thomas.bonf...@gmail.com, [20110128 - 08:23:31]
Before starting to implement something extensive around label
Hello guys, we're a startup and new to mapserver. We're expecting large
amounts of data to come by (at least on our scale) around 40-60TB of
raster images for mapserver to render. My question is for the
infrastructure, what is the best way to store this (cost-efficiently)?
- Do we just get a
Hello,
I am trying to configure mapserver with fastcgi with . / Configure
-with-php=/usr/include/php -with-fastcgi=/usr.
But i still get the following error message:
Configure: error: Unable to link Against -L/usr/lib-lfcgi
I already have the files libfcgi.so.0, libfcgi.so.0.0.0, libfcgi + +.
Hello pcaeiro,
pcaeiro pjbcae...@gmail.com, [20110128 - 02:09:03]
Hello,
I am trying to configure mapserver with fastcgi with . / Configure
-with-php=/usr/include/php -with-fastcgi=/usr.
But i still get the following error message:
Configure: error: Unable to link Against -L/usr/lib
Hello thanks for the help,
I am using Centos. :)
You were rigth, i miss the fcgi-devel packadge...
I installed and the mapserver configure command ran without problems, such
as the make, but the fact is that when I run the command mapserver -v the
result is this:
MapServer version 5.6.6
Hi,
I would personally recommend against AWS S3/EBS for anything of this scale as
the I/O is pretty pathetic unless you invest in their very high end instances.
We've set up a 4TB 'SAN' using glusterfs on AWS EC2 using 1TB EBS volumes and
separate instances for each - the performance has been
All,
I'm working on a similar project currently. Setting up 50tb of storage, we
went the route of multiple CPUs, with large disks. Redundant raid config, so
half of physical disk available for storage. We're in the 30+tb of real
storage across a 4U setup right now. Cost (with
There are ways to use S3 as the store for source images by using tools
like s3fs (FUSE-based file system backed by Amazon S3) and writing
front end code the intercepts the incoming WMS request, filters using
a grid, then routes to the appropriate EC2 MapServer instance. This
allows particular
Thank you for the prompt replies so far! : )
@Mark
Great, that's the first time I heard about that method. I'm doing a
reality check here haha sadly I dont think we can do that kind of work
as of now (skill-wise) and money is an issue as well as EC2 instances
cost so much more for small
I think current S3 pricing for 50TB at 0.125/GB comes to about
6250/month. That is for Designed for 99.9% Durability. I
can't even count that many 9s. I know you can buy HDs for about
$50/TB = $2500 for that 50TB. Assuming you replace them all once a
year its still only $5000.
But we
On 1/28/2011 11:14 AM, Mark Korver wrote:
I think current S3 pricing for 50TB at 0.125/GB comes to about
6250/month. That is for Designed for 99.9% Durability. I
can't even count that many 9s. I know you can buy HDs for about
$50/TB = $2500 for that 50TB. Assuming you replace them all
@Mark Yes, so big of a difference. HDDs dont even fail often : ) What
can you say about our current plan:
Assuming we need 10TB of storage,
We get a dedicated server somewhere on a reputable provider like
SoftLayer the max HDDs they can put in a single box is 24 so assuming we
get 2TB HDDs
now we have some real numbers.
reputable provider
10TB/$1800
Amazon S3
10TB/$1250
Amazon EBS
10TB/$1000
its not that simple a comparison. but looking at those numbers and
knowing that with AWS you can run everything else as a function of
need (EC2,LB,SQS,mail services... etc etc) AWS starts
A correction about the dedicated machine price:
that's for 48TB = 24HDDs x 2TB each which is the max they can put on one
single machine but you dont get any sort of redundancy that way so youd
probably do RAID 1+0 for the added I/O speed and safety but you only get
24TB
so that's 24TB for
I don't have actual numbers handy to back this up, but a rough comparison from
what we observed rendering relatively complex maps was that EBS storage was
perhaps 2-4 as slow as a local dell desktop running linux with eSATA 1TB drives
(not high end hardware for sure). Using glusterfs was 8+
there is a lot analysis of EBS IO performance out there. like
http://orion.heroku.com/past/2009/7/29/io_performance_on_ebs/
but I think, my earlier question, about the purpose of this mapserver
system needs to be addressed to be able to go further.
for example, if you are reading a lot of
On 1/28/2011 1:19 PM, Mark Korver wrote:
there is a lot analysis of EBS IO performance out there. like
http://orion.heroku.com/past/2009/7/29/io_performance_on_ebs/
but I think, my earlier question, about the purpose of this mapserver
system needs to be addressed to be able to go further.
for
Hi everyone. This should be an easy one, but I was wondering how I
could change the mouse pointer in a MapServer/PHP Mapscript app? The
map image resides in an HTML frame. As it is now, the mouse pointer is a
hand pointing the index finger. I'd like to change it back to the
standard arrow
19 matches
Mail list logo
