Hi,
For clarification, it used to be rather a long time ago that the index file
(.qix) was not utilised even it was present in the data folder if the LAYER
DATA was given as
DATA C:\Data\WMS_DATA.shp
Index was used only if the LAYER DATA was like
DATA C:\Data\WMS_DATA
However, this in old
Opacity is set as a single integer between 0 and 100 on the layer level.
There are no limitations on setting it on multiple layers, but in that
case the opacity adds up, so if you have two layers with opacity 50,
the final opacity of the image ends up being 75.
If your final images end up with no
looking through the code, both GD and the other renderers should
support loading GIF and PNG images. (This also concerns pixmap
symbols, legend icons, etc... i.e. anything which requires loading an
image file outside of GDAL)
Can you supply the and the reference image you are using ?
regards,
About the GD library: the dowload site (http://www.boutell.com/gd/) is
down, and there is no indication how long this will be so. There is a
link to the code repository, but no standard tar-file is to be found
there. Since MapServer cannot be compiled without GD, would it make
sense to provide
Hi,
I just tried creating a qix file as suggested and found that the Shape file
now renders 22 times faster! Fantastic advice guys. Many thanks.
If only there was a way to prevent the TTF file being continuously accessed
when displaying a symbol using a truetype font. Any further ideas at all?
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:57, Jon-Paul Dobson jpdobso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just tried creating a qix file as suggested and found that the Shape file
now renders 22 times faster! Fantastic advice guys. Many thanks.
If only there was a way to prevent the TTF file being continuously
Resent without the .log attachment as it seems this is being blocked to
mapserver users.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Jon-Paul Dobson jpdobso...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for looking into this. I'm using plain old File Monitor to see that
the .TTF file is being accessed hundreds
On 11-05-11 9:59 PM, Ben Madin wrote:
I'm not sure whether it is still the case, but it used also to be that
if you wanted to use the index, you need to name the shapefile without
the .shp extension. If you used the .shp extension it wouldn't use the
.qix index.
So maybe this is a question - Is
hello
i use sld to symbolize a wms layer
the sld file is validate by udig to describe the same postgis sources
but in the wms we don't see any point (i use well known star) but label is
drawing correctly
i dont read any error in mapserver log ms-error.txt
how to know where is trouble log
On 11-05-12 04:57 AM, Jan Hartmann wrote:
About the GD library: the dowload site (http://www.boutell.com/gd/) is
down, and there is no indication how long this will be so. There is a
link to the code repository, but no standard tar-file is to be found
there. Since MapServer cannot be compiled
Steve,
Thanks to your patch I was able to render thick lines inside polygons
(http://i56.tinypic.com/1z347yq.jpg).
The solution of using a STYLE with GEOMTRANSFORM got me thinking of
using the technique to solve some of the labeling challenges:
2. Place polygon annotation on/inside
Thanks Jeff,
Truth be told, I haven't set up a map file with a shapefile for about three
years (all our data is in PostGIS now), so I haven't looked at the docs on that
for a while.
Based on the feedback here, could I maybe suggest that the last part of the
shptree page be reworded to
ok it is solved
pb with ogc:literal it is better whitout
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Tonton to.ton...@gmail.com wrote:
hello
i use sld to symbolize a wms layer
the sld file is validate by udig to describe the same postgis sources
but in the wms we don't see any point (i use well
Hi,
MapServer appears to do most of what I need it too. Is there any reason why
one would choose GeoServer as an alternative? Are there any disadvantages to
MapServer when compared to GeoServer?
Regards,
Jon-Paul.
___
mapserver-users mailing list
There have been lots of comparisons done, just Goggle mapserver vs geoserver.
IMHO the big differences are:
- Platform: C/C++ vs Java
- GeoServer WFS-T Support (although see TinyOWS for WFS-T and
MapServer)
- GeoServer GUI-based configuration (vs mapfiles)
There
There have been lots of comparisons done, just Goggle mapserver vs
geoserver.
IMHO the big differences are:
-Platform: C/C++ vs Java
-GeoServer WFS-T Support (although see TinyOWS for WFS-T and MapServer)
-GeoServer GUI-based configuration (vs mapfiles)
You may also be interested in the
Hello,
You can look for example this comparison by P. Ramsey
http://s3.cleverelephant.ca/geoweb-mapserver.pdf
Regards
ThomasG
GIS specialist
___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
The MapServer Team is pleased to announce the long awaited release of
MapServer 6.0.0.
The 6.0 release introduces important changes in key components of the
MapServer core, as well as a large number of new features and
enhancements. The complete list of changes and enhancements is too long
18 matches
Mail list logo
