[mapserver-users] AIXM support via WFS?

Hi, I wonder if mapserver supports handling AIXM data, and if it would expose AIXM data via WFS to WFS clients? Best regards, Akos ___ mapserver-users mailing list mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org

Re: [mapserver-users] EXTENT in LAYER definition not clipping

Hi, Mapserver does not support what you want. Setting EXTENT on layer level is pushing it directly into layer bounding box in the GetCapabilities document without checking it from data. It can make GetCapabilites to work fastes. However, you can zoom around those extents. MAP level ectents do

[mapserver-users] WMS GetMap request - incorrect layer ordering

Hello All, I'm finding a difference between the image produced by shp2img and a WMS GetMap request. The image produced by shp2img looks as I expect honoring the order in which LAYERS are defined in the map file and the STATUS value. However, the WMS request does not seem to respect the order

Re: [mapserver-users] WMS GetMap request - incorrect layer ordering

Following up on this a bit, it appears that with shp2img: 1) order of LAYERs defined in the map file matters, order of the parameters in the -l parameter does not. 2) STATUS default causes a layer to always be drawn in the expected order. with the WMS GetMap request: 1) order of LAYERs defined

Re: [mapserver-users] WMS GetMap request - incorrect layer ordering

Hi, You had only one layer in your WMS request but I suppose it was just an accident. Layers in WMS request should be respected so that the first layer goes to the bottom and next ones above it. Order in the mapfile should not matter. I can't say about your installation but it seems to behave

[mapserver-users] problem with MapServer as WMS client

I am going from OpenLayers to MapServer acting as a WMS client to a remote server. OL is requesting SRS 900913, and the remote server is sending data in 4326, and I want to send it back to OL in 900913. My layer definition is like so LAYER NAME foo TYPE

Re: [mapserver-users] WMS GetMap request - incorrect layer ordering

Thanks for your reply Jukka. The reason for the single layer in the WMS request is that the other layer has a STATUS default which I understood to mean that it was always returned regardless of the value in the WMS layers parameter. Indeed this has been my experience, problem is that the

[mapserver-users] Perl MapScript WMS

I am trying to revisit serving WMS and WFS with Perl MapScript and MapServer 6.0.1. If there is anyone who is successfully doing this, please contact me. Many thanks, -- Puneet Kishor___ mapserver-users mailing list mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org