Re: [mapserver-users] Displaying Huge Data on Mapserver

2009-08-21 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Rishikant Lal wrote: Dear Friends, I have a problem. I am trying to display nearly 10 Million Rows of Point feature on Map Server. I have imported the Data on Post GIS, Created GistIndex and even used Fast CGI. Features Display very quickly without Labels. Problem occurs if I try to label

Re: [mapserver-users] Displaying Huge Data on Mapserver

2009-08-21 Thread Stephen Woodbridge
Frank Warmerdam wrote: Rishikant Lal wrote: Dear Friends, I have a problem. I am trying to display nearly 10 Million Rows of Point feature on Map Server. I have imported the Data on Post GIS, Created GistIndex and even used Fast CGI. Features Display very quickly without Labels. Problem

Re: [mapserver-users] Displaying Huge Data on Mapserver

2009-08-20 Thread Rishikant Lal
Dear Friends, I have a problem. I am trying to display nearly 10 Million Rows of Point feature on Map Server. I have imported the Data on Post GIS, Created GistIndex and even used Fast CGI. Features Display very quickly without Labels. Problem occurs if I try to label them in Layer definition. Is

[mapserver-users] Displaying Huge Data on Mapserver

2009-08-19 Thread Rishikant Lal
Dear Friends, I need some help. I have a Point Feature Layer that I want to display on Map Server. The layer has Nearly Ten Million Point Features. What kind of Data Base should I use? Will Post GIS support this kind of Data? What are the steps I should use to speed up the Map Display Process?

Re: [mapserver-users] Displaying Huge Data on Mapserver

2009-08-19 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Rishikant Lal wrote: Dear Friends, I need some help. I have a Point Feature Layer that I want to display on Map Server. The layer has Nearly Ten Million Point Features. Rishikant, This is not a terribly large database though it is certainly large enough that care must be taken in how it is

Re: [mapserver-users] Displaying Huge Data on Mapserver

2009-08-19 Thread Simon Haddon
I have had a postgresql / postgis database with over 120 million rows of point data in a single table and I have been amazed about how well postgresql performs. As long as you get your indexes and queries right then I would recommend that option for point data. Cheers, Simon Frank Warmerdam