That's probably a result of what drove MapServer development early on.
MapServer itself is just a binary (CGI/FCGI) that can do stuff as simple as
making simple inset maps or scalebars to distributing maps and data using
OGC services with plenty of variations in between. Each call is discrete
and
Hi Folks,
(Disclosure: I'm the person behind that blog post.)
> I wonder how this statistics would look like if MapServer had a
built-in web administration interface like the other competing applications.
The fact MS is so high without it shows it may not be that important, at
least not to
Very interesting comparison.
I wonder how this statistics would look like if MapServer had a built-in
web administration interface like the other competing applications.
Best regards,
Tamas
Jeff McKenna ezt írta (időpont: 2020. jún.
5., P, 18:09):
> Something I noticed this morning:
We're number 3!
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:09 AM Jeff McKenna
wrote:
> Something I noticed this morning: MapServer users might be interested in
> recently published statistics of deployed mapping engine types (ArcGIS,
> GeoServer, MapServer/MapCache, QGIS Server, etc.) :
>
Something I noticed this morning: MapServer users might be interested in
recently published statistics of deployed mapping engine types (ArcGIS,
GeoServer, MapServer/MapCache, QGIS Server, etc.) :
https://www.geoseer.net/blog/?p=2020-06-04_geospatial_server_software
-jeff
--
Jeff McKenna
