That's a weird one. It kinda sounds like a data issue for that certain area
more than a mapserver issue. I mean, if there was something funky going on with
image size and scale computation I'd expect all images at that zoom level and
image size to be blank, not just one. I'd recommend further
Thanks for the response. The images are in a tif format and we used GDAL to
create the tiling index (gdaltindex command). We ran the gdalinfo command
against the imagery and nothing out of the ordinary stands out. The size of
the tile that is giving us trouble is 5471, 5457. The tile to the
Do your tiffs have overviews? Changing the image size affects the map
scale and thus potentially which overview is being used...
--
thomas
On 25 February 2014 16:52, Dash jim...@co.clackamas.or.us wrote:
Thanks for the response. The images are in a tif format and we used GDAL to
create the
Our tiff images do not have overviews. We are thinking that something may
have happened during the transfer of the image from our Windows machine to
Linux machine. I highly doubt this is the case but it's worth a shot.
I was just reading about creating overviews. It seems this would increase
Hi,
Overviews help at small scales. Let's assume that you have orthophotos with 1
meter native pixel size. If you want to show a 10x10 km area in a 500x500 pixel
sized box in your application, it means that the pixel size of the output it 20
m. It is heavy to read 1x1 native pixels and
