Hi,
Could somebody tell how can I make my WMS requests to validate? I am sending
WMS GetMaps with two extra parameters tag and value by adding them to the
end of the request like tag=amenityvalue=supermarket.
Tag and value can be anything and they should be used inside the following
have you tried without the surrounding slashes? i.e.
VALIDATION
tag .
value .
END
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:37, Rahkonen Jukka jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi wrote:
Hi,
Could somebody tell how can I make my WMS requests to validate? I am sending
WMS GetMaps with two extra parameters tag
Hi,
Great, it works with plain . I was just reading a mail from yesterday by
Stephen Woodbridge telling
I do not think there is a global OFF switch for validation, but where
validation is required you can include the regex validation string of
/./ which means match anything except a null
Thanks Steve. I don't understand the syntax: in the regex versions I use, . means
one and just one character, not any string.
Any string excluding the null-string would be .+ or ..*
More generally, I still have problems with validation as a concept: it's too
difficult, and perhaps that's why
Hi,
I am not so sure that we all are competent database administrators. Lots of us
has started with tutorials like
http://www.duif.net/postgis/ and they do not tell much about fighting against
SQL injection.
I consider it is good to have security settings in Mapserver. I admit they
should be
Hi Armin,
Although I'm not sure if the free call was useful... since it was only
removing the php object from a global list but the object was not really freed
until the end of the script... I would suggest to simply add a such condition
if ms_version 6 ... obj-free() rather than removing
Dear All,
former subject of this thread was Re: NoDATA value, transparency for
paletted IMG file -
I'm having difficulties displaying 4bit-per-pixel PNG images served
via WMS to a GoogleEarth-API-Application (the NoData-Values aren't
transparent but shaded black, whereas this worls well for 8bpp
Hi,
I work for an LBS based company, we have our own proprietary rendering
engine for producing maps, and we work mainly with data from Navteq and
Teleatlas. Presently our rendering engine is behind the competition in
terms of visual quality (we have a bad support for antialiasing, label
Paolo,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 15:19, Paolo Crosato paolo.cros...@ubiest.com wrote:
Hi,
I work for an LBS based company, we have our own proprietary rendering
engine for producing maps, and we work mainly with data from Navteq and
Teleatlas. Presently our rendering engine is behind the
Paolo,
You can also do labeling via the TEXT directive with something like
TEXT [LABEL_INT]#[LABEL_EN] #MapServer 6 syntax
WRAP #
Performance on Oracle Spatial (which we use for national and international
scale datasets, including NavTeq and TomTom) is quite good.
Mike
--
Michael Smith
Dear All,
I have 2 MapServer servers. One for Production use, and the other for
Validation use.
The MAP files placed on those servers are similar except that each server
has a different Oracle database as datasource.
For now, I have some different CONNECTION values depending if the map file
One potential way to do it would be with the use of 'include's.
http://mapserver.org/mapfile/Include.html
The primary mapfile wouldn't have a connection object, but it would contain:
INCLUDE connect_info.map
Then on each machine, you would have a different version of connect_info.map
that
Nicolas,
I didn't have a mapfile that utilizes connection handy, but I did test using
INCLUDE to substitute the value for DATA in an individual layer.
Here is part of the layer definition:
LAYER
NAME watersheds
STATUS DEFAULT
#DATA 'majclip'
INCLUDE inc_data_majclip.map
TYPE POLYGON
Thank you David,
Yes, using INCLUDE should be a good solution. But as I know in MapServer
5.6, CONNECTION is a parameter of my LAYER objects, and not an object
itself. So I cannot have a CONNECTION object declared in a separate map
fileĀ
And I prefer to not have to duplicate the layers in
As David stated, the INCLUDE keyword does not have to be a full
mapserver object, it can be any valid mapserver keywords.
--
thomas
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 16:49, Nicolas BOUTET nicolas.bou...@geosys.com wrote:
Thank you David,
Yes, using INCLUDE should be a good solution. But as I know in
Hi,
No problem at all. I have it this way
For each layer
LAYER
STATUS ON
GROUP default
PROJECTION
init=epsg:3067
END
INCLUDE /usr/map/connection_osm_i.map
maxscaledenom 500010
minscaledenom 250010
TYPE LINE
NAME roadsclose
DATA way from (select
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about how MapServer log errors and where it saves
temporary files.
In my mapfile I have declared
CONFIG MS_ERRORFILE file.err #and DEBUG is not set
LOG file.log #in the WEB block
TEMPPATH ... #in the WEB block
Playing with SLD and polygon fill with exernal graphic
On 11-04-29 1:59 PM, Arnd Wippermann wrote:
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about how MapServer log errors and where it saves
temporary files.
In my mapfile I have declared
CONFIG MS_ERRORFILE file.err #and DEBUG is not set
LOG file.log #in the WEB block
TEMPPATH ... #in the WEB block
The
Alan
I used a script creating 3 different type of objects without applying
the free method, put it in a loop with 1M cycles and opened it in a
browser. Checking the memory usage of the Apache process while running
the script showed no increase of memory at all. So I would guess the
free() is
On 28/04/2011 3:12 PM, Yewondwossen Assefa wrote:
Sorry I hit send with finishing the e-mail. I will through each items
tomorrow and report.
On 28/04/2011 3:10 PM, Yewondwossen Assefa wrote:
On 28/04/2011 9:34 AM, Arnd Wippermann wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in map styling with SLD and have
That's what I thought. Thanks for testing.
Alan
On April 29, 2011 01:40:42 pm Armin Burger wrote:
Alan
I used a script creating 3 different type of objects without applying
the free method, put it in a loop with 1M cycles and opened it in a
browser. Checking the memory usage of the Apache
. is a pattern that says the string contains at least one character, it's a
wild card so that's why anything matches. Granted, regex's aren't easy to use
but you can accomplish a lot with very simple patterns, plus I've not seen or
been presented with a better idea.
Validation is (and will be)
Hi Dana,
Usually it does not matter much, as mapserver passes the query to Postgis
anyway, as you noted. However, mapserever does do some parsing rewriting of
the query before issuing it, and this can cause issues.
Also note that when working in the db, it is easier to use explain, check
Hi
Here you can online see
external graphic mostly not showing
http://gis.ibbeck.de/ginfo/apps/OLExamples/OL210/MapServer_SLD_World/MapServ
er_SLD_World.asp?SLDsrcIdx=51mapservVersion=6.0.0
Perhaps it has something to do with the complexity of the polygons. Locally
test with simplier polygons
On 4/29/2011 6:37 AM, Jan Hartmann wrote:
Thanks Steve. I don't understand the syntax: in the regex versions I
use,. meansone and just one character, not any string. Any
string excluding the null-string would be.+ or..*
Not . means match any single character in the string. It does not mean
25 matches
Mail list logo
