Re: [mapserver-users] [TINYOWS] 'Looser' XSD?

2012-09-07 Thread Stephen Woodbridge

Eric,

Thanks for reporting this because I have to dive into doing the same 
shortly.


I would suggest that OpenLayers is where the problem is because it is 
generating the XML that is going to TinyOWS. I have not looked into this 
specific issue but in general OL is pretty flexible and you might only 
need to set the appropriate namespace or GML level in OL to fix this 
problem. I would check with that list first.


Thanks,
  -Steve

On 9/7/2012 1:08 AM, Eric wrote:


Hello list,
I am trying to save features to a PostGIS DB using tinyows. Saving
geometries alone works fine, updating records works well, but as soon as
I combine attributes and geometries, I get an error from tinyows
indicating that the XML is not in the right format. I have noticed a
difference between the 3 scenarios. For instance, when I save a geometry
without attributes, I get the following: (this works fine)

wfs:Insert
 feature:parcels xmlns:feature=http://www.tinyows.org/;
 feature:geom
 gml:MultiSurface xmlns:gml=http://www.opengis.net/gml;  
srsName=EPSG:3857
 gml:surfaceMember
 gml:Polygon
 gml:exterior
 gml:LinearRing
 gml:posList-10752./gml:posList
 /gml:LinearRing
 /gml:exterior
 /gml:Polygon
 /gml:surfaceMember
 /gml:MultiSurface
/feature:geom
/feature:washco_parcels
/wfs:Insert



And, when I add attributes, I get the following: (generates an error to
teh effect that feature:address1test is unexpected)

wfs:Insert
 feature:parcels xmlns:feature=http://www.tinyows.org/;
 feature:geom
 gml:MultiSurface xmlns:gml=http://www.opengis.net/gml;  
srsName=EPSG:3857
 gml:surfaceMember
 gml:Polygon
 gml:exterior
 gml:LinearRing
 gml:posList-10752./gml:posList
 /gml:LinearRing
 /gml:exterior
 /gml:Polygon
 /gml:surfaceMember
 /gml:MultiSurface
/feature:geom
*feature:address1test/feature:address1*
/feature:washco_parcels
/wfs:Insert


Finally, if I do a simple UPDATE, I get the following: (works fine)

wfs:Update xmlns:demo=http://www.tinyows.org/;  typeName=demo:parcels
wfs:Property
 wfs:Namegeom/wfs:Name
 wfs:Value
 gml:MultiSurface xmlns:gml=http://www.opengis.net/gml;  
srsName=EPSG:3857
 gml:surfaceMember
 gml:Polygon
 gml:exterior
 gml:LinearRing
 gml:posList-10737./gml:posList
 /gml:LinearRing
 /gml:exterior
 /gml:Polygon
 /gml:surfaceMember
 /gml:MultiSurface
/wfs:Value
/wfs:Property
*wfs:Property
 wfs:Nameobjectid/wfs:Name
 wfs:Value18785/wfs:Value
/wfs:Property*

...

The first difference is in the namespace used (feature vs wfs). Any
reason why it is doing so? Another difference is in the way attributes
are included:

wfs:Property
 wfs:Nameobjectid/wfs:Name
 wfs:Value18785/wfs:Value
/wfs:Property

vs

feature:address1test/feature:address1

The third example (using wfs:Property) seems to be the correct way to
specify information in a WFS file. The first example works fine despite
not using that format, because I suspect the GML schema is more flexible
and since it does not have attributes that are not geometries, it is
considered valid.

So I tried turning off schema checking in the tinyows.xml file and the
problem payload go through without issues. So this seem to indicate that
some of the XSD used are strict and don't allow attributes to be defined
like feature:address1test/feature:address1.

So my question is how do I fix this best?

 1. remove schema enforcing at the tinyows level. Couldn't this lead to
potential security issues with the server?
 2. Change the XSD files to allow both ways to define attributes.
Wouldn't this go against the WFS standard?
 3. Change the way OL generates the payload. Not sure where it does it
or how to force it to use a different one.


BTW, I am using OL 2.12 and Tinyows 1.0.0
thanks!
Eric





___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users



___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


Re: [mapserver-users] [TINYOWS] 'Looser' XSD?

2012-09-07 Thread Eric
Indeed, it appears it should be straightforward to resolve this from the 
OL end.
I have just summoned the help of the OpenLayers-User mailing list 
gurus about this. Refer to the thread over there for further information.

Thanks,
Eric

On 09/07/2012 11:57 AM, Stephen Woodbridge wrote:

Eric,

Thanks for reporting this because I have to dive into doing the same 
shortly.


I would suggest that OpenLayers is where the problem is because it is 
generating the XML that is going to TinyOWS. I have not looked into 
this specific issue but in general OL is pretty flexible and you might 
only need to set the appropriate namespace or GML level in OL to fix 
this problem. I would check with that list first.


Thanks,
  -Steve

On 9/7/2012 1:08 AM, Eric wrote:


Hello list,
I am trying to save features to a PostGIS DB using tinyows. Saving
geometries alone works fine, updating records works well, but as soon as
I combine attributes and geometries, I get an error from tinyows
indicating that the XML is not in the right format. I have noticed a
difference between the 3 scenarios. For instance, when I save a geometry
without attributes, I get the following: (this works fine)

wfs:Insert
 feature:parcels xmlns:feature=http://www.tinyows.org/;
 feature:geom
 gml:MultiSurface xmlns:gml=http://www.opengis.net/gml;  
srsName=EPSG:3857

 gml:surfaceMember
 gml:Polygon
 gml:exterior
 gml:LinearRing
gml:posList-10752./gml:posList
 /gml:LinearRing
 /gml:exterior
 /gml:Polygon
 /gml:surfaceMember
 /gml:MultiSurface
/feature:geom
/feature:washco_parcels
/wfs:Insert



And, when I add attributes, I get the following: (generates an error to
teh effect that feature:address1test is unexpected)

wfs:Insert
 feature:parcels xmlns:feature=http://www.tinyows.org/;
 feature:geom
 gml:MultiSurface xmlns:gml=http://www.opengis.net/gml;  
srsName=EPSG:3857

 gml:surfaceMember
 gml:Polygon
 gml:exterior
 gml:LinearRing
gml:posList-10752./gml:posList
 /gml:LinearRing
 /gml:exterior
 /gml:Polygon
 /gml:surfaceMember
 /gml:MultiSurface
/feature:geom
*feature:address1test/feature:address1*
/feature:washco_parcels
/wfs:Insert


Finally, if I do a simple UPDATE, I get the following: (works fine)

wfs:Update xmlns:demo=http://www.tinyows.org/; 
typeName=demo:parcels

wfs:Property
 wfs:Namegeom/wfs:Name
 wfs:Value
 gml:MultiSurface xmlns:gml=http://www.opengis.net/gml;  
srsName=EPSG:3857

 gml:surfaceMember
 gml:Polygon
 gml:exterior
 gml:LinearRing
gml:posList-10737./gml:posList
 /gml:LinearRing
 /gml:exterior
 /gml:Polygon
 /gml:surfaceMember
 /gml:MultiSurface
/wfs:Value
/wfs:Property
*wfs:Property
 wfs:Nameobjectid/wfs:Name
 wfs:Value18785/wfs:Value
/wfs:Property*

...

The first difference is in the namespace used (feature vs wfs). Any
reason why it is doing so? Another difference is in the way attributes
are included:

wfs:Property
 wfs:Nameobjectid/wfs:Name
 wfs:Value18785/wfs:Value
/wfs:Property

vs

feature:address1test/feature:address1

The third example (using wfs:Property) seems to be the correct way to
specify information in a WFS file. The first example works fine despite
not using that format, because I suspect the GML schema is more flexible
and since it does not have attributes that are not geometries, it is
considered valid.

So I tried turning off schema checking in the tinyows.xml file and the
problem payload go through without issues. So this seem to indicate that
some of the XSD used are strict and don't allow attributes to be defined
like feature:address1test/feature:address1.

So my question is how do I fix this best?

 1. remove schema enforcing at the tinyows level. Couldn't this lead to
potential security issues with the server?
 2. Change the XSD files to allow both ways to define attributes.
Wouldn't this go against the WFS standard?
 3. Change the way OL generates the payload. Not sure where it does it
or how to force it to use a different one.


BTW, I am using OL 2.12 and Tinyows 1.0.0
thanks!
Eric


___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users


[mapserver-users] [TINYOWS] 'Looser' XSD?

2012-09-06 Thread Eric

  
  


  
  Hello list,
I am trying to save features to a PostGIS DB using tinyows.
Saving geometries alone works fine, updating records works well,
but as soon as I combine attributes and geometries, I get an
error from tinyows indicating that the XML is not in the right
format. I have noticed a difference between the 3 scenarios. For
instance, when I save a geometry without attributes, I get the
following: (this works fine)
  
  
  wfs:Insert
feature:parcels xmlns:feature="http://www.tinyows.org/"
feature:geom
gml:MultiSurface xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml" srsName="EPSG:3857"
gml:surfaceMember
gml:Polygon
gml:exterior
gml:LinearRing
gml:posList-10752./gml:posList
/gml:LinearRing
/gml:exterior
/gml:Polygon
/gml:surfaceMember
/gml:MultiSurface
/feature:geom
/feature:washco_parcels
/wfs:Insert

  
  
  And, when I add
attributes, I get the following: (generates an error to teh
effect that "feature:address1test" is unexpected)

  
  
  wfs:Insert
feature:parcels xmlns:feature="http://www.tinyows.org/"
feature:geom
gml:MultiSurface xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml" srsName="EPSG:3857"
gml:surfaceMember
gml:Polygon
gml:exterior
gml:LinearRing
gml:posList-10752./gml:posList
/gml:LinearRing
/gml:exterior
/gml:Polygon
/gml:surfaceMember
/gml:MultiSurface
/feature:geom
feature:address1test/feature:address1
/feature:washco_parcels
/wfs:Insert

  
  Finally, if I do a simple UPDATE, I get the following: (works
  fine)
  
  wfs:Update xmlns:demo="http://www.tinyows.org/" typeName="demo:parcels"
wfs:Property
wfs:Namegeom/wfs:Name
wfs:Value
gml:MultiSurface xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml" srsName="EPSG:3857"
gml:surfaceMember
gml:Polygon
gml:exterior
gml:LinearRing
gml:posList-10737./gml:posList
/gml:LinearRing
/gml:exterior
/gml:Polygon
/gml:surfaceMember
/gml:MultiSurface
/wfs:Value
/wfs:Property
wfs:Property
wfs:Nameobjectid/wfs:Name
wfs:Value18785/wfs:Value
/wfs:Property

  ...
  
  The first difference is
in the namespace used (feature vs wfs). Any reason why it is
doing so? Another difference is in the way attributes are
included:
  
  wfs:Property
wfs:Nameobjectid/wfs:Name
wfs:Value18785/wfs:Value
/wfs:Property
  vs
  feature:address1test/feature:address1
  The third example (using wfs:Property) seems to be the correct way
  to specify information in a WFS file. The first example works fine
  despite not using that format, because I suspect the GML schema is
  more flexible and since it does not have attributes that are not
  geometries, it is considered valid.
  
  So I tried turning off schema checking in the tinyows.xml file and
  the problem payload go through without issues. So this seem to
  indicate that some of the XSD used are strict and don't allow
  attributes to be defined like
  feature:address1test/feature:address1.
  
  So my question is how do I fix this best?
  
remove schema enforcing at the tinyows level. Couldn't this
  lead to potential security issues with the server?
Change the XSD files to allow both ways to define
  attributes. Wouldn't this go against the WFS standard?
Change the way OL generates the payload. Not sure where it
  does it or how to force it to use a different one.

  
  
  BTW, I am using
OL 2.12 and Tinyows 1.0.0
  thanks!
  Eric
  
  


  

___
mapserver-users mailing list
mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users