> On 5 May 2016, at 22:33, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
>
> confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA
>>^^
>>> The question is not about relicensing GPLv2 patch under BSD. It's
>>> about getting any license at
Sergei Golubchik writes:
> Was it under GPLv2, that would've been enough.
Ok, this is good to know. So if a patch is made available only under GPLv2,
not BSD or MCA, it can still be included in MariaDB, same as any other
contribution.
> So, indeed, the standard request is
Hi, Kristian!
On May 05, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> Sergei Golubchik writes:
>
> >> > confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA
> ^^
> > The question is not about relicensing GPLv2 patch under BSD. It's
> >
Sergei Golubchik writes:
>> > confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA
^^
> The question is not about relicensing GPLv2 patch under BSD. It's about
> getting any license at all.
So do I understand you
Hi, Kristian!
On May 05, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> Sergey Vojtovich writes:
>
> > Since Alexey's patch wasn't yet accepted by MySQL we need his
> > confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA
> > terms. @akopytov, could you confirm?
>
> That _really_ is
Sergey Vojtovich writes:
> Since Alexey's patch wasn't yet accepted by MySQL we need his
> confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA
> terms. @akopytov, could you confirm?
That _really_ is completely ridiculous! So here we have a patch. You will
gladly
6 matches
Mail list logo