Re: [Maria-developers] [MariaDB/server] MDEV-9857: line cache size (to 10.1) (#169)

2016-05-05 Thread Colin Charles
> On 5 May 2016, at 22:33, Sergei Golubchik wrote: > > confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA >>^^ >>> The question is not about relicensing GPLv2 patch under BSD. It's >>> about getting any license at

Re: [Maria-developers] [MariaDB/server] MDEV-9857: line cache size (to 10.1) (#169)

2016-05-05 Thread Kristian Nielsen
Sergei Golubchik writes: > Was it under GPLv2, that would've been enough. Ok, this is good to know. So if a patch is made available only under GPLv2, not BSD or MCA, it can still be included in MariaDB, same as any other contribution. > So, indeed, the standard request is

Re: [Maria-developers] [MariaDB/server] MDEV-9857: line cache size (to 10.1) (#169)

2016-05-05 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi, Kristian! On May 05, Kristian Nielsen wrote: > Sergei Golubchik writes: > > >> > confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA > ^^ > > The question is not about relicensing GPLv2 patch under BSD. It's > >

Re: [Maria-developers] [MariaDB/server] MDEV-9857: line cache size (to 10.1) (#169)

2016-05-05 Thread Kristian Nielsen
Sergei Golubchik writes: >> > confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA ^^ > The question is not about relicensing GPLv2 patch under BSD. It's about > getting any license at all. So do I understand you

Re: [Maria-developers] [MariaDB/server] MDEV-9857: line cache size (to 10.1) (#169)

2016-05-05 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi, Kristian! On May 05, Kristian Nielsen wrote: > Sergey Vojtovich writes: > > > Since Alexey's patch wasn't yet accepted by MySQL we need his > > confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA > > terms. @akopytov, could you confirm? > > That _really_ is

Re: [Maria-developers] [MariaDB/server] MDEV-9857: line cache size (to 10.1) (#169)

2016-05-05 Thread Kristian Nielsen
Sergey Vojtovich writes: > Since Alexey's patch wasn't yet accepted by MySQL we need his > confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA > terms. @akopytov, could you confirm? That _really_ is completely ridiculous! So here we have a patch. You will gladly