Colin Charles co...@askmonty.org writes:
On 25 Mar 2010, at 02:09, Daniel Bartholomew wrote:
If so, my thinking is that the first 5.2 release will be called
5.2.1
and then go up from there.
This is the only logical way forward
We can then say 5.2.1 branched from MySQL 5.x (for example)
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Kristian Nielsen
kniel...@knielsen-hq.orgwrote:
Colin Charles co...@askmonty.org writes:
On 25 Mar 2010, at 02:09, Daniel Bartholomew wrote:
If so, my thinking is that the first 5.2 release will be called
5.2.1
and then go up from there.
This is
Adam M. Dutko dutko.a...@gmail.com writes:
If we're always pulling from a mysql stable release and porting their
features/patches why not always be a minor number above them?
Say they release 5.2 ... we've added their patches from 5.2 but also added
Ah, but the thing is, MySQL will never (as
Ah, but the thing is, MySQL will never (as far as we know/guess) release
5.2. MySQL 5.2, 6.0, 5.4, they've all been officially cancelled! Next
version
currently is planned as MySQL 5.5. So we squeezed into the spare room :)
Then why not move away from their versioning numbers but always
4 matches
Mail list logo
