> On 5 May 2016, at 22:33, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
>
> confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA
>>^^
>>> The question is not about relicensing GPLv2 patch under BSD. It's
>>> about getting any license at
Hi, Alexander!
Sure, that's ok. A couple of comments below:
On May 05, Alexander Barkov wrote:
> diff --git a/sql/sql_select.cc b/sql/sql_select.cc
> index a6bbfc8..0d8bfb3 100644
> --- a/sql/sql_select.cc
> +++ b/sql/sql_select.cc
> @@ -988,6 +988,7 @@ JOIN::prepare(TABLE_LIST *tables_init,
>
Hi Monty,
Thanks for you reply. Please allow me to disagree with some points. :)
Attached please find 2 patches, both fix this memory leak. One approach is
for detached threads, another one is for joinable threads.
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 02:12:17PM +0300, Michael Widenius wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On
Sergei Golubchik writes:
> Was it under GPLv2, that would've been enough.
Ok, this is good to know. So if a patch is made available only under GPLv2,
not BSD or MCA, it can still be included in MariaDB, same as any other
contribution.
> So, indeed, the standard request is
Hi, Kristian!
On May 05, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> Sergei Golubchik writes:
>
> >> > confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA
> ^^
> > The question is not about relicensing GPLv2 patch under BSD. It's
> >
Sergei Golubchik writes:
>> > confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA
^^
> The question is not about relicensing GPLv2 patch under BSD. It's about
> getting any license at all.
So do I understand you
Hi, Kristian!
On May 05, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> Sergey Vojtovich writes:
>
> > Since Alexey's patch wasn't yet accepted by MySQL we need his
> > confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA
> > terms. @akopytov, could you confirm?
>
> That _really_ is
Sergey Vojtovich writes:
> Since Alexey's patch wasn't yet accepted by MySQL we need his
> confirmation that we can take it under BSD-new or MCA
> terms. @akopytov, could you confirm?
That _really_ is completely ridiculous! So here we have a patch. You will
gladly
Hi!
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Sergey Vojtovich wrote:
> Hi Monty,
>
> I vaguely recall you told me once that you like detached threads more than
> joinable, specifically for service threads. Could you remind me what were
> the reasons behind it?
>
> I need this to fix
Hi, Alexander!
On May 04, Alexander Barkov wrote:
> >> @@ -2513,7 +2530,14 @@ void Item_func_nullif::update_used_tables()
> >> }
> >> else
> >> {
> >> -Item_func::update_used_tables();
> >> +/*
> >> + No needs to iterate through args[2] when it's just a copy of
> >>
Hi Sergei,
Please review a patch for MDEV-10030, which is a part of
MDEV-8909 union parser cleanup.
Thanks!
commit 0f4f2e3b5ebabce1308c45772785aec084092674
Author: Alexander Barkov
Date: Thu May 5 12:29:36 2016 +0400
MDEV-10030 sql_yacc.yy: Split table_expression and
11 matches
Mail list logo