Hi Sanja,
I was wondering if you have any progress with optimizer_switch default
settings change that we decided to do for the 5.3.2 release?
Any ETA on when that will be pushed?
BR
Sergey
--
Sergey Petrunia, Software Developer
Monty Program AB, http://askmonty.org
Blog:
Hi!
As discussed on the yesterday's call, we're starting to prepare for the
next 5.3 release, 5.3.2 beta. The intent is to build it on this or on the
next weekend.
Before the release, we need to do
1. Bugs
2. optimizer_switch changes.
3. Merge from mariadb-5.1
We don't need to address:
1.
Hello,
When coding MWL#182, I've found out that it is very difficult to print
the same value of select_type as EXPLAIN does.
Problem description
---
Moreover, any attempt to unify EXPLAIN and SHOW EXPLAIN code cause numerous
test failures because of changed select_type.
Hi Sergei,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:55:40PM +0200, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, Sergey!
On Aug 23, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
MWL#182: Explain running statements
First code
- Asynchronous procedure call system
I would like to review that part (at least), could you please tell me
Hi Timour,
Ok to push.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 03:41:55PM +0300, tim...@askmonty.org wrote:
At file:///home/tsk/mprog/src/5.3/
revno: 3166
revision-id: tim...@askmonty.org-20110823123915-jxf9hvxq2hy03rr7
parent:
Hi Sanja
A summary of our discussion on irc/skype:
Please change EXPCACHE_DISK_HITMISS_RATIO to be a hit ratio, i.e fraction
of accesses that result in cache hits, as that's this is the most common
number people use when they think about cache performance.
Please change one limit into two:
1.
Hello,
The bug database has 197 bugs with status=Fix committed and
target_milestone=5.3.
Since we've released 5.3, is it time to change status on these bugs to Fix
released?
BR
Sergey
--
Sergey Petrunia, Software Developer
Monty Program AB, http://askmonty.org
Blog:
Hi Sanja,
Ok to push.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 05:10:29PM +0300, sa...@askmonty.org wrote:
At file:///home/bell/maria/bzr/work-maria-5.3-subquerycachedisk/
revno: 3135
revision-id:
Hello,
The below really should be in documentation, but for now, I'm posting it here:
Semi-join processing with Duplicate Elimination
===
There are three cases:
Semi-join next to outer join
ot1 left join (ot10, ot11)
Hi Timour,
Could you please review the below:
- Forwarded message from Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org -
From: Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org
To: comm...@mariadb.org
X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 1.2)
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:43:12 +0400 (MSD)
Subject: [Commits] Rev 3096
Hi Timour,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 03:40:49PM +0300, Timour Katchaounov wrote:
Sergey
Could you please review my fix for bug lp:802979.
I need you specifically because I needed to touch
the range optimzizer to disable evaluation of
single-row subqueries.
Please consider if I chose the
Hello,
Following what has been decided on the optimizer call, I'm nearly done with
making semi-join optimizations off by default in 5.3. However, some of 5.3's
new optimizations are still turned on by default.
Here is a list of 5.3 features and flags that control them:
Hello Igor,
I've discovered the following:
Consider a testcase for https://bugs.launchpad.net/maria/+bug/803365.
There we have a query that's using a derived table that's on the inner side
of an outer join:
SELECT *
FROM t1
WHERE t1.f1 IN (
SELECT t2.f2
FROM t2
LEFT
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:20:07AM +0200, Vladislav Vaintroub wrote:
-Original Message-
From: maria-developers-
bounces+wlad=montyprogram@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:maria-
developers-bounces+wlad=montyprogram@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Sergey Petrunya
Sent
Hello Philip,
I'd like to get the tree at lp:~maria-captains/maria/5.3-subqueries-mwl90
tested for Duplicate Elimination with outer+semi-join processing.
I'm interested in crashes, as well as wrong query result bugs. The code path
that needs to be tested is selected with this @@optimizer_switch
Hi Timour,
Ok to push.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 05:40:25PM +0300, tim...@askmonty.org wrote:
At file:///home/tsk/mprog/src/5.3-mwl89/
revno: 3062
revision-id: tim...@askmonty.org-20110627144014-r14ahro6uzf77423
parent:
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 09:51:44AM -0400, Daniel Bartholomew wrote:
We're getting closer to the first beta release of MariaDB 5.3 and
several of the new features have been documented in the Knowledgebase
and linked to from this page:
http://kb.askmonty.org/en/what-is-mariadb-53
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:13:12PM +0400, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
Hello,
Please find below descriptions of problems with current @@optimizer_switch
variable, as well as a proposal on how to fix it.
Results of IRC discussion on June, 22 (as I interpret them):
Everyone agrees that we need
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:50:34PM +0200, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, Sergey!
On Jun 10, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
Hello,
Please find below descriptions of problems with current @@optimizer_switch
variable, as well as a proposal on how to fix it.
contents
Problems
Hello,
Please find below descriptions of problems with current @@optimizer_switch
variable, as well as a proposal on how to fix it.
contents
Problems with @@optimizer_switch
Proposed solution
Details about hooking this into parser
Alternate approach1: grouping
/contents
Problems with
Hi!
All of the recent 5.3 builds in buildbot have two failures:
innodb_plugin.innodb_bug54044 'innodb_plugin'
innodb_plugin.innodb_information_schema 'innodb_plugin'
The failure happens only with innodb_plugin. XtraDB is fine.
I've investigated the first problem. Its cause is in
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:19:42PM +0400, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
Hi!
All of the recent 5.3 builds in buildbot have two failures:
innodb_plugin.innodb_bug54044 'innodb_plugin'
skip
The problematic changesets are:
revno: 3009 [merge]
revision-id: mo...@askmonty.org-20110528030022
Hi Sergei,
Current 5.3 fails as follows:
http://buildbot.askmonty.org/buildbot/builders/mac-mini-x86-dbg/builds/771/steps/compile/logs/stdio
g++ -DMYSQL_SERVER -DDEFAULT_MYSQL_HOME='/usr/local/mysql'
-DMYSQL_DATADIR='/usr/local/mysql/var'
-DSHAREDIR='/usr/local/mysql/share/mysql'
Hello,
This is to inform you that today I've pushed MWL#90 into 5.3-main. There was a
buildbot run on 5.3-subqueries-mwl90 tree before the push, and it did not show
any failures that weren't also present in 5.3-main.
The result of my merge has an issue that conceptually it is not a full merge,
Hi Timour,
While merging, I also got the following questions:
== exclude_expensive_cond ==
make_cond_for_table()'s exclude_expensive_cond parameter is not used anymore.
Was it intentional that you kept it in the code?
(minimizing MWL#89's diff size could not be a reason because the diff changes
Hi Timour,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:10:44PM +0300, Timour Katchaounov wrote:
Thank you for the review, you manged to spot a couple of real omissions/
problems with the implementation. I implemented or responded to all your
review suggestions except two. The two ones that I didn't implement
Hi Timour,
Congratulations on having pushed MWL#89 into 5.3-main! This is quite an
achievement which really moves us forward.
I've been studying the new code and has got some feedback which I thought
I need to share. Please find the notes below, marked with 'psergey'.
diff -urN
Hello Igor,
First, an overall comment: there are lots of typos/coding style violations in
the patch. To reduce amount of effort spent on such things, I was just fixing
them as I saw them and I'm attaching the patch with all the fixes (i.e. this
patch should be applied on top of the patch that I
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 03:08:12AM +0400, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
Hello Igor,
First, an overall comment: there are lots of typos/coding style violations in
the patch. To reduce amount of effort spent on such things, I was just fixing
them as I saw them and I'm attaching the patch with all
Hi Timour,
Ok to push.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:55:43PM +0300, tim...@askmonty.org wrote:
At file:///home/tsk/mprog/src/5.3/
revno: 2947
revision-id: tim...@askmonty.org-20110328095536-wbmu1hiwsnhw6bs8
parent:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:24:37PM +0300, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
Hi Monty,
Please find attached the complete patch of MWL#90 for review. The tree with
the code is on launchpad/buildbot:
https://code.launchpad.net/~maria
Hello Igor,
Could you please review the below:
- Forwarded message from Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org -
From: Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org
To: comm...@mariadb.org
X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 1.2)
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 00:17:53 +0300 (MSK)
Subject: [Commits] Rev 2929
comparison, as well as simplified the testcase a
bit (further simplification is difficult). Please find the result below:
- Forwarded message from Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org -
From: Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org
To: comm...@mariadb.org
X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 1.2)
Date
Hello Igor,
Here's the promised proof of deadcode:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 08:49:37PM -0800, Igor Babaev wrote:
=== modified file 'sql/sql_select.cc'
--- a/sql/sql_select.cc 2011-02-06 04:57:03 +
+++ b/sql/sql_select.cc 2011-02-12 04:41:22 +
@@ -8419,6 +8438,11 @@
Hello Igor,
Could you please review the below:
- Forwarded message from Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org -
From: Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org
To: comm...@mariadb.org
X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 1.2)
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 00:30:02 +0300 (MSK)
Subject: [Commits] Rev 2926
Hi Timour,
Could you please review the below? (Asking you because the fix is in the loose
index scan optimizer)
- Forwarded message from Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org -
From: Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org
To: comm...@mariadb.org
X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 1.2)
Date
Hi Monty,
Please find attached the complete patch of MWL#90 for review. The tree with
the code is on launchpad/buildbot:
https://code.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.3-subqueries-mwl90
http://buildbot.askmonty.org/buildbot/grid?branch=5.3-subqueries-mwl90
and it has no failures other than
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:20:13PM -0800, Igor Babaev wrote:
=== modified file 'sql/sql_select.cc'
--- a/sql/sql_select.cc2011-02-06 04:57:03 +
+++ b/sql/sql_select.cc2011-02-12 04:41:22 +
...
@@ -8419,6 +8438,11 @@
sort_by_tab-type= JT_ALL;
Hello Igor,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 02:22:02PM -0700, Igor Babaev wrote:
At file:///home/igor/maria/maria-5.3-mwl128-bug664508/
revno: 2833
revision-id: i...@askmonty.org-20101024212201-t8iius4jikcvm3zb
parent:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 08:49:37PM -0800, Igor Babaev wrote:
Hi Sergey,
Please review this patch that fixes a defect of the current
implementation of the mwl #128 that never couples hash join
with range/index_merge scans.
The patch also adds prefix #hash# to the names of the used hash
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:16:58PM -0800, Igor Babaev wrote:
I've just reported bug #611648 that probably explains the strange
results I had when trying to run my benchmark queries for DS-MRR
about which I talked at today's optimizer meeting.
I don't think that the posted queries show
Per Philip's request, details to replicate the dataset:
== Server settings ==
[mysqld]
innodb_file_per_table=1
innodb_file_format=barracuda
innodb_log_file_size=100M
== DDL ==
I based on Percona's DDL
Hello Philip,
One more note about correlated results: I agree that it's true that the
optimizer can't make a good choice if the data is correlated.
But since this is intersection, we could take this from other end: when
doing intersection scan, calculate utility of using extra indexes on the
Hello Igor,
I was looking at sort-intersect and noticed the following: Consider this table:
CREATE TABLE `t1` (
`k1` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
`k2` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
`filler` char(100) DEFAULT NULL,
KEY `k1` (`k1`),
KEY `k2` (`k2`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
Let's try
Hello,
index_merge uses @@sort_buffer_size as a guide of how much space it can use for
sorting. I think there is an issue with the way it is done.
Before index_merge was introduced, @@sort_buffer_size was used only by
filesort (also for couple of other cases like GROUP_CONCAT with sorting, but I
Added feedback provided by Igor over skype:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:31:52PM +0300, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
Below are some ideas on how to make DS-MRR/BKA easier to work with for the
users (= those who don't run mysqld under debugger). Questions are marked with
'Q:' but any comments
Hello,
Below are some ideas on how to make DS-MRR/BKA easier to work with for the
users (= those who don't run mysqld under debugger). Questions are marked with
'Q:' but any comments are welcome.
Better EXPLAIN
--
Philip has complained numerous times that it is not shown in EXPLAIN
Hi Philip,
The new version of MWL#121-125, DS-MRR impovements, is ready for your testing.
I believe all previously reported crashes and wrong query result bugs are no
longer there (they've been either targeted and fixed, or were gone after code
re-working I've made when addressing review
Hi Timour,
In Helsinki, we've noted the following:
MWL#90: Subqueries: Inside-out execution for non-semijoin materialized
subqueries in WHERE (4K diff); Critical task
= Get the code reviewed/pushed
TODO:
- Timour will tell the obvious things to improve; Timour 1 day
I'm going to need
Hi!
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Oleksandr Byelkin wrote:
Preparation statement for PS looks like this (example uses prep_where,
but we have the same problem for other parts stored in
st_select_lex::fix_prepare_information()):
...
conds-fix_fields(...conds...) /* (1.1)
Hello Igor,
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:17:13PM -0800, Igor Babaev wrote:
Sergey,
Please review this patch ASAP as this bug blocks Philip with testing.
If you have any questions contact me by skype.
Ok to push after the comment below is addressed.
Original Message
Hello Igor,
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:04:24PM -0800, Igor Babaev wrote:
Sergey,
Please review this fix.
Ok to push after the irc feedback (lack of comments about JOIN_CACHE format) is
addressed.
Original Message
Subject: [Commits] Rev 2860: Fixed LP bug #675922.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 05:42:25PM +0300, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
* EXPLAIN currently shows hash join as follows:
MariaDB [hj1] explain extended select * from t1 A, t2 B where A.a=B.a
Hi Philip,
I've been fixing bugs in maria-5.3-mwl128-dsmrr-cpk tree, fixed two of the four
problems so far. My general impression is that crashes are easier to fix than
wrong results. Is it possible to run RQG in a mode that will cause it to ignore
the difference in query results, and stop only
Ok to push.
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 08:36:33PM -0800, Igor Babaev wrote:
At file:///home/igor/maria/maria-5.3-bug668644/
revno: 2845
revision-id: i...@askmonty.org-20101109043632-s053dbydv48cr9nz
parent:
Hi Philip,
The combined tree with DS-MRR improvements and MWL#128 is ready for testing. It
is located at lp:~maria-captains/maria/maria-5.3-mwl128-dsmrr-cpk/ .
I don't know how hard that is for you, but it would be useful to check the
failures
- against 5.3-main tree (to see whether the problem
Hi Philip,
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 03:34:41PM +0300, Philip Stoev wrote:
- Our chances of making Random Query Generator a little bit friendlier for
bug analyzers/fixers.
Hi,
Can you list specific issues that you are having or specific bug numbers
that were not filed properly?
I can't
Hi Timour,
When one compiles 5.3, it produces the following warnings which I believe fall
into your turf. Could you please fix them:
item_subselect.cc: In member function ‘bool
subselect_rowid_merge_engine::init(MY_BITMAP*, MY_BITMAP*)’:
item_subselect.cc:4826: warning: ignoring return value of
Hello Igor,
Plese find the comments below.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:56:10PM -0700, Igor Babaev wrote:
At file:///home/igor/maria/maria-5.3-mwl128-bug668290/
revno: 2840
revision-id:
Hi Timour,
Answers to irc questions:
timour spetrunia, I found a problem in get_partial_join_cost(), could you
please look at this:
timour for (uint i= join-const_tables; i n_tables + join-const_tables ;
i++)
timour spetrunia, why i n_tables + join-const_tables ? isn't the number
of tables
Hello Igor,
Please find some minor comments below. Ok to push after they are addressed.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 05:14:08AM -0700, Igor Babaev wrote:
At file:///home/igor/maria/maria-5.3-mwl128-bug57024/
revno: 2827
revision-id:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:54:37AM +0400, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
Hello Igor,
Please find attached the combined patch that addresses all of the review
feedback provided so far.
The tree is in launchpad and buildbot also:
https://code.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.3-dsmrr-cpk
Hi Philip,
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 09:12:19AM +0200, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
Please find attached the combined patch of DS-MRR for clustered PKs and key
sorting.
The tree is in launchpad and buildbot also:
https://code.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.3-dsmrr-cpk
and all observed
Hello Igor,
Ok to push. I'm sorry for the delay.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 10:50:03PM -0700, Igor Babaev wrote:
#At lp:maria based on revid:mo...@askmonty.org-20100615220051-2xp3g51fysxle1r1
2869 Igor Babaev 2010-07-25
Fixed bug #52005.
Corrected coding for Warshall's
Hello Igor,
Ok to push.
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:43:18PM -0700, Igor Babaev wrote:
Sergey,
Please review this patch for the 5.2 tree.
Regards,
Igor.
Original Message
Subject: [Commits] bzr commit into Mariadb 5.2, with Maria 2.0:maria/5.2
branch (igor:2827)
Hello Igor,
Ok to push.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:01:30PM -0700, Igor Babaev wrote:
Sergey,
Please review this trivial patch for the 5.2 tree.
Regards,
Igor.
Original Message
Subject: [Commits] bzr commit into Mariadb 5.2, with Maria 2.0:maria/5.2
branch
Hello Igor,
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:42:49AM -0700, Igor Babaev wrote:
=== modified file 'sql/table.cc'
--- a/sql/table.cc2010-07-13 14:34:14 +
+++ b/sql/table.cc2010-07-17 07:37:48 +
@@ -1930,8 +1930,6 @@ end:
semantic analysis of the item by calling the the function
Hello Igor,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:54:37PM -0700, Igor Babaev wrote:
Please review this patch for the 5.2 tree.
Regards,
Igor.
Ok to push.
Original Message
Subject: [Commits] bzr commit into Mariadb 5.2, with Maria 2.0:maria/5.2
branch (igor:2823) Bug#603186
Date:
Hello Igor,
Please find the feedback below.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 07:08:34PM -0700, Igor Babaev wrote:
Please review this patch for the 5.2 tree.
Regards,
Igor.
Original Message
Subject: [Commits] bzr commit into Mariadb 5.2, with Maria 2.0:maria/5.2
branch
Hello Igor,
Ok to push.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 07:08:58PM -0700, Igor Babaev wrote:
Please review this patch for the 5.2 tree.
Regards,
Igor.
Original Message
Subject: [Commits] bzr commit into Mariadb 5.2, with Maria 2.0:maria/5.2
branch (igor:2822) Bug#603654
Hello Igor,
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:55:58PM -0700, Igor Babaev wrote:
According to our agreement I introduced a new flag for MRR.
I called it HA_MRR_MATERIALIZED_KEYS. This flag passed to any MMR
interface function that takes mrr_mode as a parameter says:
key values used in ranges are
Hello 5.3 developers,
We all know that 5.3 tree have some buildbot failures that
- are unlikely to be result of any 5.3 work,
- cannot be observed in 5.2
- still are somehow present.
I got suspicious about one failure, and investigated it:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/maria/+bug/597742. Long
Hello Igor,
Please find below the combined patch for MWL#121. It is ready for review.
diff -urN --exclude='.*'
maria-5.3-dsmrr-for-cpk-clean/mysql-test/r/innodb_mrr_cpk.result
maria-5.3-dsmrr-for-cpk-noc/mysql-test/r/innodb_mrr_cpk.result
---
, hence the presence of loads
of commented-out old code and lack of real comments. I'll address this a bit
later.
- The suspicious thing confirmed and fixed.
- Style suggestions followed.
Sergey == Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org writes:
cut
Sergey === modified file 'sql
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:00:02AM +1000, Arjen Lentz wrote:
Hi Sergey
On 25/05/2010, at 6:59 AM, worklog-nore...@askmonty.org wrote:
TASK...: Push conditions down into non-mergeable VIEWs when
possible
TASK ID: 119 (http://askmonty.org/worklog/?tid=119)
Will this have
Hi Sanja,
Here is the fix:
=== modified file 'sql/sql_select.cc'
--- sql/sql_select.cc 2010-03-29 20:09:40 +
+++ sql/sql_select.cc 2010-04-19 17:59:46 +
@@ -5214,7 +5214,7 @@ greedy_search(JOIN *join,
'join-best_positions' contains a complete optimal extension of the
Hi Sanja,
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:54:25PM +0300, Oleksandr Byelkin wrote:
I found 1 interesting test case:
create table t1 (a int, b int);
insert into t1 values (1,2),(3,4),(1,2),(3,4),(3,4),(4,5),(4,5),(5,6),
(5,6),(4,5);
create table t2 (c int, d int);
insert into t2 values
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 04:08:49PM +0400, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
Hi Sanja,
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:54:25PM +0300, Oleksandr Byelkin wrote:
I found 1 interesting test case:
create table t1 (a int, b int);
insert into t1 values (1,2),(3,4),(1,2),(3,4),(3,4),(4,5),(4,5),(5,6),
(5,6
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r12/
revno: 2789
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100406081058-ihhw7esolj0mzc9a
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100405201645-kuavh2rxc9whflc0
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r12/
revno: 2790
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100406083401-36tcbqvit0wtilcx
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100406081058-ihhw7esolj0mzc9a
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r12/
revno: 2791
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100406091710-xamea3aolh3rdspu
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100406083401-36tcbqvit0wtilcx
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r12/
revno: 2792
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100406103533-0upq6g7sse9sjstz
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100406091710-xamea3aolh3rdspu
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
Hello,
As requested, I've pushed the latest 'stable'(*) version of subquery
optimizations
into lp:~maria-captains/maria/5.3.
(*) - stable here means:
= there are no subquery-optimizations related failures in buildbot
= there are no known new subquery issues (there are still some
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r10/
revno: 2786
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100329140435-bb21mofh3i85tt4q
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100323145750-sr9oucry979i3p60
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r10/
revno: 2787
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100329200940-9ikx6gpww0gtsx00
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100329140435-bb21mofh3i85tt4q
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r10/
revno: 2783
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100321195033-jzl1l091k2nbb6zh
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100320165930-ehfull9rin1bdme4
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
-20100315224130-321rym1lsuwz2j5z
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org
branch nick: maria-5.3-subqueries-r10
timestamp: Sat 2010-03-20 15:08:44 +0300
message:
Merge
modified:
mysql-test/suite/pbxt/r/subselect.result
subselect.result-20090402100035-4ilk9i91sh65vjcb-146
mysql-test/suite/pbxt
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r10/
revno: 2782
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100320165930-ehfull9rin1bdme4
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100320120844-n8dvu5loib2fjvwl
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r7/
revno: 2777
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100315060659-0spqc4jdav12ja2u
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100314182543-4t3ehit7df20adu8
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r7-rel/
revno: 2777
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100315063254-z1ctm7srl0573s5c
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100314182543-4t3ehit7df20adu8
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
-20100315060659-0spqc4jdav12ja2u
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org
branch nick: maria-5.3-subqueries-r7-rel
timestamp: Mon 2010-03-15 09:35:35 +0300
message:
Merge
modified:
mysql-test/r/type_datetime.result
sp1f-type_datetime.result-20001228015634-jrgwqpilnfn4kvdp6wm5hp5imvf3tkek
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r7-rel/
revno: 2774
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100314175412-umtxuabkn4txl1yd
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100307154145-ksby2b1l0sqm1xne
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r7-rel/
revno: 2775
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100314175549-0gcze3pxaudgapxh
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100314175412-umtxuabkn4txl1yd
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
-20100313211106-5xyfyl02gfenbi7f
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org
branch nick: maria-5.3-subqueries-r7-rel
timestamp: Sun 2010-03-14 21:25:43 +0300
message:
Merge
modified:
mysql-test/r/subselect_mat.result
subselect_mat.result-20100117143924-r0jv32dj80dg3b5h-1
mysql-test/r
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r7/
revno: 2774
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100313200452-kq4dxayp7b45zum1
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100307154145-ksby2b1l0sqm1xne
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
Hi!
I can't offer any testcases but I think this patch has several issues. See
below.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:38:52AM +, Evgeny Potemkin wrote:
#At file:///work/bzrroot/45174-bug-azalea/ based on
revid:a...@sun.com-20090702085822-8svd0aslr7qnddbb
2814 Evgeny Potemkin 2009-10-13
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r7/
revno: 2775
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100313211106-5xyfyl02gfenbi7f
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100313200452-kq4dxayp7b45zum1
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
At file:///home/psergey/dev/mariadb-5.1-knielsen/
revno: 2797
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100309100049-n986bg9spx4mlamp
parent: kniel...@knielsen-hq.org-20100304080603-qq61atw8t0im9qf4
committer: Sergey Petrunya pser
.
- Forwarded message from Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org -
From: Sergey Petrunya pser...@askmonty.org
To: maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 1.2)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:53:58 +0300 (MSK)
Subject: [Maria-developers] Rev 2798: Fix a buildbot memory leak due
Hi!
I was looking through subquery code and found the following issue
with FirstMatch strategy:
Our original intent with FirstMatch strategy was to support join orders where
sj-inner tables are interleaved with outer tables that are not correlated
with the subquery. FirstMatch spec is here,
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
