Yes, but my question is not really about location of computational geometry
bits, but about the data management: SQL data type for geometry objects,
input/output routines.
That what i meant. That code do not use any Field data structures.
1. Field is the only place that defines GEOMETRY type
On 25 September 2013 19:27, Alexey Botchkov holyf...@askmonty.org wrote:
Yes, but my question is not really about location of computational
geometry
bits, but about the data management: SQL data type for geometry objects,
input/output routines.
That what i meant. That code do not use any
On 24 September 2013 02:49, Roberto Spadim robe...@spadim.com.br wrote:
2013/9/23 Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
I'm going to ask question about how the current Spatial Extensions are
implemented.
I have spent some time reading the source code in the current trunk
(spatial.h|cc,
On 24 September 2013 04:17, Roberto Spadim robe...@spadim.com.br wrote:
2013/9/23 Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
On 23 September 2013 22:10, Alexey Botchkov holyf...@askmonty.org wrote:
1. Is it possible to implement MariaDB extensions like Spatial (custom
type + set of functions)
On 24 September 2013 19:28, Roberto Spadim robe...@spadim.com.br wrote:
Here (mariadb lists) ideas are wellcome (at least some ideas that i
posted was accepted or discussed) and patchs are *very* wellcome
Roberto,
Good to know. I will use JIRA if I ever have anything relevant.
[...]
I like
Hi,
I'm going to ask question about how the current Spatial Extensions are
implemented.
I have spent some time reading the source code in the current trunk
(spatial.h|cc, gcal*.h|cc, related Field and Item definitions, etc.),
so I have a rough understanding of the overall structure, how the
On 23 September 2013 22:10, Alexey Botchkov holyf...@askmonty.org wrote:
1. Is it possible to implement MariaDB extensions like Spatial (custom
type + set of functions) without such a tight coupling with the
internal implementation of the type system (without messing Field
class with geometry
Hi mateusz, i'm a user and a hobby developer... i will answer with what i
know
2013/9/23 Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
Hi,
I'm going to ask question about how the current Spatial Extensions are
implemented.
I have spent some time reading the source code in the current trunk
hi again :)
i'm not a mariadb team developer, so please consider me as an user/udf
developer =]
2013/9/23 Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
On 23 September 2013 22:10, Alexey Botchkov holyf...@askmonty.org wrote:
1. Is it possible to implement MariaDB extensions like Spatial (custom
type
9 matches
Mail list logo
