Hi, Kristian!
On Jan 11, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> Sergei Golubchik writes:
>
> >> To the question of the usage of trX cache by non-trX let me answer
> >> broadly to mention @@binlog_direct_non_transactional_update = false
> >> leads to aggregation of mixed, say innodb + myisam, events in trx
>
Hi, Andrei!
On Jan 11, Andrei Elkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 1:06 PM Sergei Golubchik wrote:
>
> > Hi, Andrei!
> >
> > On Jan 11, Andrei Elkin wrote:
> > > Howdy, Sergei!
> > >
> > > To the question of the usage of trX cache by non-trX let me answer
> > > broadly to mention
Sergei Golubchik writes:
>> To the question of the usage of trX cache by non-trX let me answer
>> broadly to mention @@binlog_direct_non_transactional_update = false
>> leads to aggregation of mixed, say innodb + myisam, events in trx
>> cache.
>
> That's different. The bug summary is "GTID
Hi, Andrei!
On Jan 11, Andrei Elkin wrote:
> Howdy, Sergei!
>
> To the question of the usage of trX cache by non-trX let me answer
> broadly to mention @@binlog_direct_non_transactional_update = false
> leads to aggregation of mixed, say innodb + myisam, events in trx
> cache.
That's different.
Hi, Andrei!
On Jan 10, Andrei Elkin wrote:
> revision-id: 9ea85a70a75 (mariadb-10.2.40-4-g9ea85a70a75)
> parent(s): 160d97a4aaa
> author: Andrei Elkin
> committer: Andrei Elkin
> timestamp: 2021-08-08 14:20:57 +0300
> message:
>
> MDEV-24654 GTID event falsely marked transactional
>
> GTID
5 matches
Mail list logo