Up to you, I have no straight opinion which way is better.
I only think that both ways are manageable.
BTW, why we have no such problem with INPLACE?
On Sat, 27 Aug 2022 at 18:11, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> Hi, Nikita,
>
> No, in this case (and commonly for collateral changes) I'd rather prefer
Hi, Nikita,
No, in this case (and commonly for collateral changes) I'd rather prefer
to refine the original (878a92e) commit to not cause the MDEV-29056 in
the first place.
Ignoring LOCK= clause is logically correct and that's what the old code
was doing anyway. But perhaps ALTER TABLE still
2 matches
Mail list logo
