Hi, Rhys!
On May 14, Rhys Campbell wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone know if the performance_schema guarantees that every
statement executed will appear in the
events_statement_summary_by_digest table (excluding those that could
be pushed out due to size restrictions). Or is it a best effort
I personally never had time to give much looks to P_S, i gave it some
looks but never seriously dug onto and really had to keep it enabled on
a production server, its a nice feature but i think that if someone
knows it and needs it, they will be able to enable it but most of the
common users
i only use it at development, at production it's not used
2014-06-03 6:24 GMT-03:00 Jean Weisbuch j...@phpnet.org:
I personally never had time to give much looks to P_S, i gave it some
looks but never seriously dug onto and really had to keep it enabled on a
production server, its a nice
Hi,
Never used it on production. From my point of view, it should be
disabled by default, but included.
The whole purpose of this variable is to have a way to analyze/optimize
performances easily, when needed; if it's enable by default, we have a
perf hit, so that's counterproductive.
I
Hi, Roberto!
On Jun 03, Roberto Spadim wrote:
i only use it at development, at production it's not used
And what performance-schema related options do you have in your
development my.cnf file? Is it only performance-schema=1 or something
more involved?
Recently there was chat about how
i will check but i compile every production binary from source, i
think it's a compile time option not my.cnf file, i will check and
return
2014-06-03 14:00 GMT-03:00 Sergei Golubchik s...@mariadb.org:
Hi, Roberto!
On Jun 03, Roberto Spadim wrote:
i only use it at development, at production
oh sorry, at development just performacnce-schema=1
and sometimes when i need more information i try two others plugins to
check query times and query cache informations (hit rate per query)
2014-06-03 14:00 GMT-03:00 Sergei Golubchik s...@mariadb.org:
Hi, Roberto!
On Jun 03, Roberto Spadim
I personally would prefer if MariaDB had performance schema not
compiled in by default. Then we wouldn't be frustrated every time we
upgrade and find out that the tarball doesn't compile without
performance schema (yes, 10.0.11 doesn't compile).
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Colin Charles
hum, maybe a -debug package and a -production package could be better
if someone what a developer version get the -debug, for production use
-production
is it easy to create two kinds of packages at mariadb release time?
2014-06-03 14:10 GMT-03:00 Pavel Ivanov piva...@google.com:
I personally
Hi, Pavel!
On Jun 03, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
I personally would prefer if MariaDB had performance schema not
compiled in by default. Then we wouldn't be frustrated every time we
upgrade and find out that the tarball doesn't compile without
performance schema (yes, 10.0.11 doesn't compile).
This
: [Maria-discuss] PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA to be disabled in 10.0 (10.0.12)
Para: Maria Discuss maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net,
maria-develop...@lists.launchpad.net
Fecha: martes, 3 de junio, 2014 10:20
Hi all,
Recently there was chat about how PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA was
enabled by mistake and it should
11 matches
Mail list logo
