On 15/10/16 03:33, Jon Foster wrote:
> I have a DB scenario that is very write intensive. Essentially its a
> large scale hit counter of sorts. Currently we're running on a single
> 12core server with 6 SSDs in a RAID6 array.
Not using RAID6 would be a good start.
> But we're looking for a way
Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Jon Foster's message of 2016-10-14 09:33:59 -0700:
I have a DB scenario that is very write intensive. Essentially its a
large scale hit counter of sorts. Currently we're running on a single
12core server with 6 SSDs in a RAID6 array. But we're
I asked about schema and queries to determine which sharding framework makes
the most sense to suggest.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 1:05 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Jon Foster's message of 2016-10-14 09:33:59 -0700:
>> I have a DB scenario that is
Excerpts from Jon Foster's message of 2016-10-14 09:33:59 -0700:
> I have a DB scenario that is very write intensive. Essentially its a
> large scale hit counter of sorts. Currently we're running on a single
> 12core server with 6 SSDs in a RAID6 array. But we're looking for a way
> to scale out
Can you describe your schema and typical queries please?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Jon Foster wrote:
>
> I have a DB scenario that is very write intensive. Essentially its a
> large scale hit counter of sorts. Currently we're running on a
5 matches
Mail list logo