Re: [Maria-discuss] gtid and current_pos vs slave_pos

2019-04-24 Thread mariadb
(Sending again, as I don't think my original reply went to the list; apologies if I duplicate.) Thank you both, for your helpful responses. > Hello. > >> mari...@biblestuph.com writes: >> >>> I have four servers all running 10.3 as follows: >>> >>> A <=> B => C => D >> >>> and C is a

Re: [Maria-discuss] gtid and current_pos vs slave_pos

2019-04-24 Thread Daniel Ragle
Thank you both, for your helpful responses. Hello. mari...@biblestuph.com writes: I have four servers all running 10.3 as follows: A <=> B => C => D and C is a master to D. In addition to their actual replicating DBs, all four servers also have a "norep" DB that is used to create

Re: [Maria-discuss] gtid and current_pos vs slave_pos

2019-04-24 Thread andrei . elkin
Hello. > mari...@biblestuph.com writes: > >> I have four servers all running 10.3 as follows: >> >>A <=> B => C => D > >> and C is a master to D. In addition to their actual replicating DBs, >> all four servers also have a "norep" DB that is used to create >> temporary tables for local report

Re: [Maria-discuss] gtid and current_pos vs slave_pos

2019-04-23 Thread Kristian Nielsen
mari...@biblestuph.com writes: > I have four servers all running 10.3 as follows: > >A <=> B => C => D > and C is a master to D. In addition to their actual replicating DBs, > all four servers also have a "norep" DB that is used to create > temporary tables for local report processing (as