Re: [Maria-discuss] 10.3.x: unknown variable 'innodb_support_xa=1'

2019-09-03 Thread Benoit Plessis
> > > Am 02.09.19 um 19:38 schrieb Faustin Lammler: > > I am truly sorry by the issue you are facing, but giving us *in > > your first post* the version and the OS would have been more > > productive IMHO > > don't get me wrong *but* i find it insulting when someone accueses me > that i jump from

Re: [Maria-discuss] 10.3.x: unknown variable 'innodb_support_xa=1'

2019-09-03 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi, Benoit! On Sep 03, Benoit Plessis wrote: > > As for your 'kind suggestion' of handling deprecated/unknown option i > personnally strongly disagree, some of mysql/mariadb options have real > impact and "physical" consequences on the database, preventing it to > start because of setting not

Re: [Maria-discuss] 10.3.x: unknown variable 'innodb_support_xa=1'

2019-09-03 Thread Benoit Plessis
On 03/09/2019 11:25, Reindl Harald wrote: > yes Yet you continue using an inappropriate tone/wording just below ... maybe you could take a bit of your own advice don't you think ? > "-DPLUGIN_PERFSCHEMA=NO" is the same as "performance-schema=0" is doing > the same while "performance-schema=0"

Re: [Maria-discuss] 10.3.x: unknown variable 'innodb_support_xa=1'

2019-09-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.09.19 um 11:53 schrieb Benoit Plessis: >> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ apachectl -t >> AH00526: Syntax error on line 14 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd-prefork.conf: >> Invalid command 'ddd=dfdfdf', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module >> not included in the server configuration >> >> where is

Re: [Maria-discuss] 10.3.x: unknown variable 'innodb_support_xa=1'

2019-09-03 Thread Benoit Plessis
On 03/09/2019 11:31, Sergei Golubchik wrote: > Hi, Benoit! > > [..] > > Note, that his use case is an option that was explicitly set to its > default value in my.cnf, and in 10.3 was removed in the server (so the > default value became hard-coded behavior and not configurable anymore). > > That

Re: [Maria-discuss] 10.3.x: unknown variable 'innodb_support_xa=1'

2019-09-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.09.19 um 11:38 schrieb Benoit Plessis: > On 03/09/2019 11:25, Reindl Harald wrote: >> when i *explicit disable* some bloatware crap it's missing exitence is >> not a hard error > Well, so you want to add some "bloat" to a software to handle deprecated > bloated "crap", are you sure to

Re: [Maria-discuss] 10.3.x: unknown variable 'innodb_support_xa=1'

2019-09-03 Thread Benoit Plessis
On 03/09/2019 11:45, Reindl Harald wrote: > a simple array with all known config options is bloat? have you ever > written software in any language? C/C++/perl/shell/java/Coldfusion pick whatever you want... But i spent more time doing admin and fighting leaks and instability > and for the

Re: [Maria-discuss] 10.3.x: unknown variable 'innodb_support_xa=1'

2019-09-03 Thread Reinis Rozitis
> and for the Apache and nginx: > > [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ apachectl -t > AH00526: Syntax error on line 14 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd-prefork.conf: > Invalid command 'ddd=dfdfdf', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module > not included in the server configuration > > where is something similar for

[Maria-discuss] Thread State: Unlocking tables

2019-09-03 Thread mariadb
Can someone fill me in as to what's happening behind the scenes when a thread has the state "Unlocking tables?" I looked here but did not see it listed: https://mariadb.com/kb/en/library/general-thread-states/ Specifically, I sometimes see threads spending a lot of time in this state, and am

Re: [Maria-discuss] Thread State: Unlocking tables

2019-09-03 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi, mariadb! On Sep 03, mari...@biblestuph.com wrote: > Can someone fill me in as to what's happening behind the scenes when a > thread has the state "Unlocking tables?" It literally does just that, unlock tables. There's nothing that could cause a long wait, as far as I can see. > I looked