All cool :)
From: Simon Phipps
To: marketing@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thu, 30 June, 2011 13:32:14
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] inconsistent boilerplate
I tend to agree with your sentiment about StarOffice, but not for the
boilerplate. The one propo
> On 27 Jun 2011, at 12:50, Benjamin Horst wrote:
>
>> When we discussed this last year, I researched a bit and found the following
>> article from the FSF:
>> http://www.fsf.org/news/2010-05-app-store-compliance
>>
>> The article's summary:
>>
>> An iPhone port of GNU Go is currently being dis
Le 2011-06-30 14:21, Marc Paré a écrit :
This is a test to see if Gmane is accepting mail.
Please do not respond.
Marc
This is a test to see if Gmane will accept an answer from Gmane.
Please do not respond.
Marc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
This is a test to see if Gmane is accepting mail.
Please do not respond.
Marc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing
On 06/30/2011 06:35 AM, drew wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:47 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
I'll like to repeat Christoph's latest proposal - everyone agrees we can
adopt this?
==
The Document Foundation has the mission of facilitating the evolution of
the LibreOffice Community into a ne
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:47 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> I'll like to repeat Christoph's latest proposal - everyone agrees we can
> adopt this?
>
> ==
> The Document Foundation has the mission of facilitating the evolution of
> the LibreOffice Community into a new, open, independent, and
>
I tend to agree with your sentiment about StarOffice, but not for the
boilerplate. The one proposed here is about as long as it should be and I
support it.
{Terse? Mobile!}
On Jun 30, 2011 8:29 AM, "Tom Davies" wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> I am happy with not mentioning Star Office but i still think that n
On 6/30/11 1:15 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Yes, the meeting happened but decisions lack gravitas due to the low number of
people involved. In small new(ish) (within the last 20 years) co-operatives the
ideal work-around is for the next meeting to vote on accepting the minutes and
separately vote on
Hi Flo,
On 24/06/2011 14:58, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Sounds good to me! What do others think?
+1
Kind regards
Sophie
--
Founding member of The Document Foundation
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki
Hi :)
I am happy with not mentioning Star Office but i still think that not
mentioning
it misses an opportunity
1) to show how old and established LO really is
2) to show that forking can lead to success
3) that this latest break is not so unusual.
Just as the break away from Star Office led Ope
Hi :)
Yes, the meeting happened but decisions lack gravitas due to the low number of
people involved. In small new(ish) (within the last 20 years) co-operatives
the
ideal work-around is for the next meeting to vote on accepting the minutes and
separately vote on accepting the decisions made.
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:53 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> drew wrote on 2011-06-29 22.48:
> > Right - from time to time things happen - that's life. It is not that
> > big a deal really, it's just good to stick with the basics - we have
> > open discussions, which means that pho
Le 2011-06-30 04:47, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
Hello,
thanks for the feedback!
I too share the view that mentioning StarOffice will unnecessarily
complicate things, so we should leave it out.
Well, OK, I don't think we need to make a big case of it. One last
remark though is that if we d
Hi Drew,
drew wrote on 2011-06-29 22.48:
> Right - from time to time things happen - that's life. It is not that
> big a deal really, it's just good to stick with the basics - we have
> open discussions, which means that phone calls are recorded and posted.
>
> That's it - all I'm saying is stic
Hi Bruce,
Bruce Martin wrote on 2011-06-27 17.53:
> I had also noticed your very capable contributions along the way (kudos)
> and surmised when I saw you had gone towards LibreOffice that likely you
> and enough more were anxious about the danger of Open Office becoming
> "less open" on a gradua
Hello,
thanks for the feedback!
I too share the view that mentioning StarOffice will unnecessarily
complicate things, so we should leave it out.
Marc Paré wrote on 2011-06-24 23.48:
> Should there also be mention of the type of licence we have adopted --
> opensource copy-left -- . Do we need t
16 matches
Mail list logo
