Hi Mike,
> "(...) I think it's fair to call it a successor project (...)"
If you think so, I agree :) (y)
After all it`s just a word, heritor, successor, or whatever.
Everybody understands ...
Sometimes I'm nitpicking. And "If you spent less time nitpicking, you'd get
more work done.".
Cheers,
> Try submitting a bug report to Microsoft. They want you to pay like
> (US)$40 for the privilege. Contrast this with LO and other free software
> projects, where one can log into a bug tracker, submit the report, and
> hear back from the developers without even touching one's wallet or
> keying
On 11/29/21 10:00, Nigel Verity wrote:
> A feature table is great for providing an "at a glance" list of what LO does
> that MS Office doesn't. It has the unfortunate side-effect, though, of
> providing a list of features for MS to build into the requirements for their
> next version of Office,
Hi Nige,
On 29.11.21 17:00, Nigel Verity wrote:
>
A feature table is great for providing an "at a glance" list of what LO
does that MS Office doesn't. It has the unfortunate side-effect, though,
of providing a list of features for MS to build into the requirements
for their next version of
Hi Filipe,
On 29.11.21 17:44, Filipe Gomes Morgado wrote:
>"(...) how LibreOffice is by far the most actively developed successor
to the OpenOffice.org project."
I think successor is a very strong word to refer to someone who still has:
/6 October 2021:/
Announcing Apache OpenOffice 4.1.11
