Article title says it all. You can find it here:
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/387199/microsoft-government-switch-to-open-source-will-cause-dissatisfaction
Not sure if we need to post a rebuttal argument in the response section
or retaliate with an article disputing MS arguments.
Cheers,
Marc
On 21/02/14 11:04, Marc Paré wrote:
Not sure if we need to post a rebuttal argument in the response section
or retaliate with an article disputing MS arguments.
I have set a phone call with the journalist at 3PM UTC, to provide our
comments to the article (and especially to the productivity
On 02/21/2014 06:04 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Article title says it all. You can find it here:
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/387199/microsoft-government-switch-to-open-source-will-cause-dissatisfaction
Not sure if we need to post a rebuttal argument in the response
section or retaliate with an
On 02/21/2014 09:30 AM, Jay Lozier wrote:
On 02/21/2014 06:04 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Article title says it all. You can find it here:
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/387199/microsoft-government-switch-to-open-source-will-cause-dissatisfaction
Not sure if we need to post a rebuttal argument in
On February 21, 2014 6:30:41 AM PST, Jay Lozier wrote:
When I read the article I got the sense of MS FUD claiming that people need
proprietary MS formats to be efficient.
In one sense, MS is being truthful. There is a huge ecosystem built around
Microsoft's file formats: CRM, ERP, and
Le Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:03:43 -0800,
Jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com a écrit :
On February 21, 2014 6:30:41 AM PST, Jay Lozier wrote:
When I read the article I got the sense of MS FUD claiming that
people need proprietary MS formats to be efficient.
In one sense, MS is being
Italo Vignoli wrote (21-02-14 14:05)
On 21/02/14 11:04, Marc Paré wrote:
Not sure if we need to post a rebuttal argument in the response section
or retaliate with an article disputing MS arguments.
I have set a phone call with the journalist at 3PM UTC, to provide our
comments to the
