- Original Message -
- Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the FPL has appointed three of those seats to volunteers and
only one to someone who's a Red Hat employee, I'm not sure how this
is
relevant. Looking at the Board history for those seats[1] one can
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:06:28PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me try to rephrase this so you better understand what I'm getting at...
Why does Red Hat reserve four seats on the board for itself to appoint to
On 06/04/2012 02:51 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
This is a good explanation. I'd also reiterate that against the
community is not supported by the fact that (1), and (2) the FPL
continues to appoint quite a few non-Red Hat employees, over the
Board's history.
Well the FPL is not elected by the
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/04/2012 02:51 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
This is a good explanation. I'd also reiterate that against the
community is not supported by the fact that (1), and (2) the FPL
continues to appoint quite a few
First thing I'd like to say - I'm pretty sure this is not a right
mailing list to discuss governance issues - there's Board Advisory
one. Sparsely used by community :(
- Original Message -
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
And here are few I think is wrong with
On 06/04/2012 07:03 PM, inode0 wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/04/2012 02:51 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
This is a good explanation. I'd also reiterate that against the
community is not supported by the fact that (1), and (2) the
On 06/05/2012 12:04 AM, inode0 wrote:
snip.../snip
Don't you think the power to influence the project's direction is
coming from the work being done more than from participation on a
governance body?
Not with regards to FESCO no I cant say I can.
More often than not decisions that have been
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 02:03:19AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 05/31/2012 03:27 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Red Hat people who contribute to Fedora are community too. There's
not a dividing line with the community on one side, and Red Hat on the
other.
I beg the differ for one
- Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the FPL has appointed three of those seats to volunteers and
only one to someone who's a Red Hat employee, I'm not sure how this is
relevant. Looking at the Board history for those seats[1] one can see
half the appointments since
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me try to rephrase this so you better understand what I'm getting at...
Why does Red Hat reserve four seats on the board for itself to appoint to
whomever it chooses?
Red Hat used to reserve five and released
On 06/01/2012 10:24 PM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
How about the bigger question, what percentage of FESCo has been Red Hat
employees during any term.
Since FESCo is fully elected, it is entirely up to Fedora contributors
to choose whom they elect. If they want to factor in, the
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:29:30AM +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro wrote:
But I think we all agree the linked article is really bad written and it
would he useful to help those news sources to improve their reporting.
In
On 05/31/2012 05:39 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:29:30AM +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Nicu Buculeinicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro wrote:
But I think we all agree the linked article is really bad written and it
would he useful to help those
On 05/31/2012 12:39 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:29:30AM +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Nicu Buculeinicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro wrote:
But I think we all agree the linked article is really bad written and it
would he useful to help those
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:22:05PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:39 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:29:30AM +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Nicu Buculeinicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro
wrote:
But I think we all agree the
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/29/2012 03:15 PM, Karin Bakis wrote:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2180673/red-hat-releases-fedora
Red Hat has released its Fedora 17!
Is it Red Hat that sends announcements and claims to be
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Here we come to one of the core issues of Red Hat vs The Fedora community as
in we ( the community ) do not view RHEL release being one function of the
Fedora Project.
The community is large and comes to Fedora
Thanks Paul (and Robyn) for your reply
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a big difference between Fedora is a beta and users are
guinea pigs, and Fedora is a place where *any contributor* can work
on new technical features and put them in
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:36 PM, inode0 ino...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.redhat.com/about/news/press-archive/2012/5/fedora17-provides-potent-virtualization-cloud-features-and-enhanced-desktop-and-developer-functionality
I can't help but read that as a sponsor expressing in public how proud
On 05/31/2012 03:27 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Red Hat people who contribute to Fedora are community too. There's
not a dividing line with the community on one side, and Red Hat on the
other.
I beg the differ for one example from within our community why does Red
Hat feel the need to appoint
On 05/29/2012 09:31 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundssonwrote:
On 05/29/2012 03:15 PM, Karin Bakis wrote:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2180673/red-hat-releases-fedora
Red Hat has released its Fedora 17!
Is it Red Hat that sends
ann B. Guðmundsson" johan...@gmail.comTo: marketing@lists.fedoraproject.orgSent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 2:18:21 PMSubject: Re: The Inquirier on F17
On 05/29/2012 03:15 PM, Karin Bakis wrote:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2180673/red-hat-relea
22 matches
Mail list logo
