David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Claus Schwarm wrote:
I don't think this is a very professional solution. If June changes for
reasons we can't influence, we'd need to correct it in another press
release. Otherwise we'd risk much confusion. No need to say how
unfortunate this would be.
I disagree. W
Hi,
Claus Schwarm wrote:
I don't think this is a very professional solution. If June changes for
reasons we can't influence, we'd need to correct it in another press
release. Otherwise we'd risk much confusion. No need to say how
unfortunate this would be.
I disagree. We should announce this
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:20:52 -0400
Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So I vote announce 'June 2006' ASAP, and figure out exact dates soon
> but without blocking other things.
>
> Luis
>
I don't think this is a very professional solution. If June changes for
reasons we can't influence,
Simos Xenitellis wrote:
Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
The abiword guys would be interested as well since they have a wikipedia
plug in.
Strange they wanted a "KDE API" as opposed to "Linux Desktop API"
integration. Maybe it's the same thing if the library is used by
everyone and doesn't involve q
Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
The abiword guys would be interested as well since they have a wikipedia
plug in.
Strange they wanted a "KDE API" as opposed to "Linux Desktop API"
integration. Maybe it's the same thing if the library is used by
everyone and doesn't involve qt.
Better have a look
On 6/24/05, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've just got a meeting with Tim and John from the board and everything
> > goes ahead. But it is not clear yet the dates of the GUADEC itself
> > (within the range of 7 days available), and the board needs to decide on
> > this.
> >
> > Que
The abiword guys would be interested as well since they have a wikipedia
plug in.
Strange they wanted a "KDE API" as opposed to "Linux Desktop API"
integration. Maybe it's the same thing if the library is used by
everyone and doesn't involve qt.
sri
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 09:26:19AM +1000, Jef
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:28:15 +0200
Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just got a meeting with Tim and John from the board and everything
> goes ahead. But it is not clear yet the dates of the GUADEC itself
> (within the range of 7 days available), and the board needs to decide on
> this.
>
> I've just got a meeting with Tim and John from the board and everything
> goes ahead. But it is not clear yet the dates of the GUADEC itself
> (within the range of 7 days available), and the board needs to decide on
> this.
>
> Question: should we wait until the dates are 100% confirmed or could
I've just got a meeting with Tim and John from the board and everything
goes ahead. But it is not clear yet the dates of the GUADEC itself
(within the range of 7 days available), and the board needs to decide on
this.
Question: should we wait until the dates are 100% confirmed or could we
simply s
10 matches
Mail list logo
