On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:00 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> Hi everyone :)
>
> I've signed up for two of the goals for 2.16, because
> they're closely related:
> * Define the content and scope of www.gnome.org
> * Define a clear structure for www.gnome.org
>
> So... before I willy-nill
> BTW, is there truly a need to re-invent the wheel and create a new
> software map?
There isn't, and that's hopefully not what we're doing. I don't know why
Claus is interpreting the direction of the discussion that way.
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca200
> However, since gnomefiles is running well, we should really ask ourselves
> why we should introduce another one.
It doesn't seem like, after some thought about what we want to achieve for
ourselves and our users, that anything like gnomefiles is what we want to
introduce on wgo (partly because
Hi!
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 21:33:53 +0200
Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd say the major "mistake" is that everybody assumes something
> different :)
Hehe. That's not a mistake, that's a feature! ;-)
Seriously: I admit 'mistake' was not the right word. However, isn't
that one of t
>Why compete in the first place?
BTW, sorry if I misunderstood (it's not clear what the Software Map really
is). Is SoftwareMap a generic gtk/gnome software repository, or specific
official Gnome "product"-app pages?
Eugenia
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail
I have also removed the big main ad on gnomefiles for now (I did that a few
days ago). It may come back only if the expenses of the server go to the
roof.
BTW, is there truly a need to re-invent the wheel and create a new software
map? I have complied with Gnome's main requests, so why gnomefil
>Gnomefiles has an unfriendly url scheme. Try guessing the app id...
Fixed:
http://www.gnomefiles.org/app.php/SSH+Tunnel+Manager
>Also, gnomefiles.org is _not_ authoritative
I am not sure what this means.
>and not translated.
No, and it will never be, because the developers only write their NE
> The main goals site [1] says:
> * Be the primary resource of information and materials about the GNOME
> project
>
> According to this, I would assume the goal of such apps pages is to be
> the one-stop authoritative info source on gnome applications
Yeah, modulo the expansive view of 'produ
> Here's what I believe is the major mistake in the discussion: Everybody
> seems to assume that an ordinary user is interested in reading all this
> stuff on our main page.
I'd say the major "mistake" is that everybody assumes something
different :) IMHO what causes the confusion is that the goa
Hi!
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:10:03 +0200
Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> What's the policy on hiding appnames? For Average Joe it's not
> trivial to find out that the file manager is nautilus or the movie
> player is totem...
>
[snip]
Here's what I believe is the major mistake
--- Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we need to get beyond the idea of "software
> map" or "projects" and
> start thinking about how we can best serve the needs
> of our users - and our
> software maintainers! Some things that we should
> think about can not even be
> boiled down t
> Looks like a good start! Here are my thoughts:
Hey - this all gets into technical details very quickly, without much in the
way of problem definition before the fact. I've mentioned this before about
the proposed shift to projects.gnome.org, and wished I'd had time to write
something concrete
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 13:06 +0200, Simon Rozet wrote:
> I am in charge off the GNOME Software Map. I wrote a draft [1] on the
> wiki but I need your opinion about what I wrote to start.
> [1]: http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/SoftwareMap
Hi,
Looks like a good start! Here are my thoughts:
Organizat
Hello,
I am in charge off the GNOME Software Map. I wrote a draft [1] on the
wiki but I need your opinion about what I wrote to start.
So... please have a look at it and let me know your ideas/opinions.
Thanks in advance.
[1]: http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/SoftwareMap
--
Simon Rozet
--
ma
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 17:44 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > EurOSCon is reserving place for free software projects to present in
> > Amsterdam this year - is there any interest in a GNOME stand there?
> >
Amsterdam just sounds cool, but isn't it in Brussels? :^)
> > My initial feeling is "no"
> EurOSCon is reserving place for free software projects to present in
> Amsterdam this year - is there any interest in a GNOME stand there?
>
> My initial feeling is "no" - from what I've seen, the OSCons aren't
> particularly desktop oriented, or necessarily free *nix oriented.
In the past, I
Hi,
EurOSCon is reserving place for free software projects to present in
Amsterdam this year - is there any interest in a GNOME stand there?
My initial feeling is "no" - from what I've seen, the OSCons aren't
particularly desktop oriented, or necessarily free *nix oriented. But if
someone is wil
17 matches
Mail list logo
