On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Vikram Vaswani
vikram.vasw...@initmarketing.com wrote:
Hello all
My name is Vikram Vaswani and I work with Initmarketing, the open source
marketing agency (www.initmarketing.com). We've been working with the
GNOME Foundation for the last few weeks to build a
Is this related to a recent mail by Paul Cutler:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/marketing-list/2010-December/msg00077.html
?
sri
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Vikram Vaswani
vikram.vasw...@initmarketing.com wrote:
Hello all
My name is Vikram Vaswani and I work with Initmarketing, the
Hi Sriram,
We'd be interested in any feedback on these slides; please post your
feedback directly to the list. We'll collect feedback until the second week
of January and then make revisions as per feedback.
Has anybody gotten back to you regarding this? We are heading into the
second of
Stormy Peters wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me
wrote:
We didn't do this for 2.0 which fed into a lot of rage on a
number of forums. Nobody could understand why we were
removing features or the philosophy behind
Hi,
Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
Yes, if you're defining developers as maintainers of core modules.
Unfortunately, people will go into deskop-devel because there is no
community mailing list that they can go to. So they will participate in
the forum that they believe has the audience they seek.
Hi,
Allan Day wrote:
Sri's comments earlier in this thread point to the desire for an
evidence base or some kind of research into the shell. I think we do
have some good material there, as I pointed out on desktop-devel
recently [1]. We need that in a public place too.
Bear in mind when
Hi Sriram,
Is this related to a recent mail by Paul Cutler:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/marketing-list/2010-December/msg00077.html
No, it's not.
I'd encourage everyone to take a look at the slides and send
thoughts/feedback to the list within next week. Many thanks in advance
for your
Hi Og,
2011/1/6 Og Maciel ogmac...@gnome.org:
Lucas,
Paul Cutler has already pushed the text to the /friends/ directory in
gnomewml. Could you make the changes for us?
Sure. I just need a few more details to get the ruler ready to publish:
- Are showing a counter of subscribers as a progress
Hey Lucas!
Sure. I just need a few more details to get the ruler ready to publish:
- Are showing a counter of subscribers as a progress bar?
Yes
- How many subscribers do we currently have?
Sadly, 13 is what I came up with since we launched. :/
- Target number of subscribers is 400,
Hi,
It's now published on www.gnome.org and planet.gnome.org. Let me know
if you need any further support.
Cheers!
--lucasr
2011/1/7 Og Maciel ogmac...@gnome.org:
Hey Lucas!
Sure. I just need a few more details to get the ruler ready to publish:
- Are showing a counter of subscribers as a
Hi,
I just pushed a couple small updates to the Friends website[1]. I
updated the sidebar to be add updates from 2010, including a11y,
usability and hiring a sysadmin. (It was showing 2008 stuff!)
I also updated the Amazon page[2] with support for Chromium and Chrome
from Jaap's last blog post.
Hi Jason,
To get around Melange's funky feature set, can you please resubmit this
update plus a link to the wiki page as Work submitted? I will then be
able to extend the deadline for you.
Thanks!
Dave.
Jason Lo wrote:
Hi, just an update. I've sent emails to Gnome Australia, Brazil,
Chicago,
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Vikram Vaswani
vikram.vasw...@initmarketing.com wrote:
Hi Sriram,
We'd be interested in any feedback on these slides; please post your
feedback directly to the list. We'll collect feedback until the second
week
of January and then make revisions as per
Hi Allan,
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Is someone willing to go through archives and talk to the people close
to the decision to try to document the features and rationale?
That was my plan for the shell design page. I'm familiar with most of
the
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 06:19, Vikram Vaswani
vikram.vasw...@initmarketing.com wrote:
- GNOME 3 Applications
...
- GNOME for Users
These are the only two which concern me; the others look great.
Particularly, the jhbuild modulesets now define featured applications which
comply with our
OK, I'm a bit confused here. For some reason I thought we had decided to go
from GNOME to Gnome as GNOME is no longer considered an abbreviation. Is
this true? It just seems that we seem to be using the two interchangeably.
For my part, I'm using Gnome.
sri
--
marketing-list mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/marketing-list/2010-April/msg00052.html
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 15:46, Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
OK, I'm a bit confused here. For some reason I thought we had decided to
go from GNOME to Gnome as GNOME is no longer considered an abbreviation.
17 matches
Mail list logo
