On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday, April 21, 2011 15:37:56 William from Texas wrote:
I am helping put together a list of primary communication channels for
the
DesktopSummit 2011 in Berlin. As August approaches, we are going to start
I didn't set comments to disabled but I find I don't feel strongly one way
or the other.
Thoughts? If we want to turn them on, any one willing to help with
moderating?
Stormy
-- Forwarded message --
From: YouTube Service serv...@youtube.com
Date: Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:06 PM
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:10:08AM -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
I didn't set comments to disabled but I find I don't feel strongly one way
or the other.
Thoughts? If we want to turn them on, any one willing to help with
moderating?
What the hell is wrong with you? You're part of the open
Stormy Peters wrote:
I didn't set comments to disabled
No, I did. :)
but I find I don't feel strongly one way or the other.
Thoughts?
The YouTube channel wasn't meant as a delivery platform. It was
primarily intended as a hosting solution, with the videos then being
embedded in our
El jue, 28-04-2011 a las 13:21 +0200, Olav Vitters escribió:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:10:08AM -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
More seriously:
1) comments are not meant to provide feedback
I guess you'll get too many negative comments and censor accusations
2) this person does not abide by
Allan:
We typically have our lawyers review official documents that relate to
legal issues such as trademark before we make changes to them. Is this
because the Wiki version of our Guidelines is not yet official? Most
official GNOME legal documents should probably be in
I don't really care about comments being on or off - personally I'd keep it
off too. Too much wasted time moderating them. As Olav said there are too
many people with free time and I would not listen to someone's comment who
does not have the courtesy to write 2 decent sentences. I don't see a
We turned it off after getting spammers and strollers almost immediately
after posting the first video. A testament to the popularity of GNOME :+)
In any case moderation on a site like YouTube is a time suck and not worth
the time of all of us who volunteer and actually have a life. (Yes, I've
Brian Cameron wrote:
Allan:
We typically have our lawyers review official documents that relate to
legal issues such as trademark before we make changes to them. Is this
because the Wiki version of our Guidelines is not yet official? Most
official GNOME legal documents should probably be
Allan:
On 04/28/11 08:32 AM, Allan Day wrote:
Brian Cameron wrote:
Allan:
We typically have our lawyers review official documents that relate to
legal issues such as trademark before we make changes to them. Is this
because the Wiki version of our Guidelines is not yet official? Most
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 08:59 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Allan:
On 04/28/11 08:32 AM, Allan Day wrote:
Brian Cameron wrote:
Allan:
We typically have our lawyers review official documents that relate to
legal issues such as trademark before we make changes to them. Is this
because the
Allan:
On 04/28/11 10:12 AM, Allan Day wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 08:59 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Refer to section 1.a.iii, which requires GNOME Users Groups to follow
these Brand Guidelines. Since we provide such direction in a document
that GNOME Users Groups sign, I would consider it
Hi Justin
We would definitely be interested in any page space on The Dot you can
provide. Some announcements will probably have a lower priority but we'll
try to keep messages interesting. I'll also be sure to let the rest of the
team know about the promo volunteers.
I have heard about the Promo
Hi Allan,
Allan Day wrote:
I wasn't aware that the brand guidelines are official or legal
documents. They are guidelines. Maybe the foundation should bless them
with officialdom... I'm not sure what that would achieve though.
It's to do with sucky trademark laws. If you trademark something,
14 matches
Mail list logo
