Karen Sandler ka...@gnome.org wrote:
...
I don't think it's actually that hard to figure out what we need to do to
improve the perception of GNOME and GNOME 3. There are lots of examples
that run contrary to the negative discourse that has been circulating -
you don't have to look far to find
On 12/14/2012 07:21 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I couldn't attend - a sick son bedtime meant that 8pm
yesterday was rush hour in the Neary household.
On 12/14/2012 03:24 PM, Emily Gonyer wrote:
Sri: Theres a common wisdom that GNOME will throw out features and are
unfriendly. We've let
On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 20:40 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
As feedback is often slow (needs several times of nagging) I'd like to
know if quarterly reports are still supported and wanted by the
community, or if we should think of a better format (e.g. merging with
news or journal activities).
No
Yes, volunteer capture was one of the issues. That's why one of the
projects was toe QA our website to make sure that we have a method of doing
volunteering capture.
I saw a similar issue in IRC where somebody came in and wanted to hack on
something and nobody answered him. (I was reading from
Hi there !
I've recently read about a post about how the Mozilla project did this year. It
has a nice infographic work and I think we can do something similar for GNOME
news in december.
Do we have data for doing a similar ?
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2012/12/14/mozilla-in-2012/
Some
