hi all,
when i try to open http://website-editors.gnome.org/ i get an 503
service unavailable screen, showing the html dummy template with an
lorem ipsum headline. it seems if that the deliverance sever and
plone/zope have problems communicating to each other.
cheers,
hannes
On Wed, 2009-12
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Johannes Raggam raggam...@adm.at wrote:
hi all,
when i try to open http://website-editors.gnome.org/ i get an 503
service unavailable screen, showing the html dummy template with an
lorem ipsum headline. it seems if that the deliverance sever and
plone/zope
of the new
website ready to be used by content editors. It's available here:
http://website-editors.gnome.org/
Carsten and CMS team, could you please give basic instructions on how
people can create accounts and start editing content?
Design team, please, have a look at the website and start
and Carsten, we now have an instance of the new
website ready to be used by content editors. It's available here:
http://website-editors.gnome.org/
Carsten and CMS team, could you please give basic instructions on how
people can create accounts and start editing content?
Design team, please, have
Hi all,
Thanks for Alexandro and Carsten, we now have an instance of the new
website ready to be used by content editors. It's available here:
http://website-editors.gnome.org/
Carsten and CMS team, could you please give basic instructions on how
people can create accounts and start editing
Looks awesome! Nice work everyone.
--
--Alex Launi
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
FYI, I got feedback from two different people today (one journalist and one
a new Friends of GNOME subscriber) that we need to show which distros ship
with GNOME.
Our new website will address this.
Just wanted to pass on the feedback that confirms we're doing good work!
Keep it up!
Stormy
Dave Neary has pointed me to some great case studies, several times.[1]
I tried to find them via google today and absolutely failed.
gnome case studies
gnome users
...
Some where in the new website we should address this.
Paul, where do we capture this type of info for the website?
Stormy
[1
via google today and absolutely failed.
gnome case studies
gnome users
...
Some where in the new website we should address this.
Paul, where do we capture this type of info for the website?
Stormy
[1]
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeMarketing/GnomeDeployments
http://live.gnome.org
.
Paul
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Stormy Peters sto...@gnome.org wrote:
Dave Neary has pointed me to some great case studies, several times.[1]
I tried to find them via google today and absolutely failed.
gnome case studies
gnome users
...
Some where in the new website we should address
Hi all,
So, here's the development plan for the new website in the scope of
the 2.27/2.28 cycle:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/TwoPointTwentyseven
The general guidelines for this project are:
1. Focus!
2. Focus!
3. Focus!
Some additional comments:
- It's nice to have ideas for the future
Hi!
As people seems to like the Foundation folder look and feel, I felt it
was time to update the website as well.
Here are some sketches:
http://www.andreasn.se/diverse/temp/foundation-website/foundation-website-mockup1.png
http://www.andreasn.se/diverse/temp/foundation-website/foundation
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Andreas Nilsson nisses.m...@home.se wrote:
Hi!
As people seems to like the Foundation folder look and feel, I felt it was
time to update the website as well.
Here are some sketches:
http://www.andreasn.se/diverse/temp/foundation-website/foundation-website
Luis Villa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Andreas Nilsson nisses.m...@home.se wrote:
Hi!
As people seems to like the Foundation folder look and feel, I felt it was
time to update the website as well.
Here are some sketches:
http://www.andreasn.se/diverse/temp/foundation-website
On 03/24/2009 04:09 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Can we do a Mediawiki install on gnome.org or something?
+1 for MediaWiki. That would take considerable sysadmin resources though.
I'll write to infra list to see what we can get.
behdad
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
logo[2] seems the sort of
thing that would fit in well somewhere. Also, perhaps some photographs
of successful events would liven up the page that talks about the good
things the Foundation has done in the past.
One thing that is lacking, but needed, in the current Foundation
website is a good place
and feel, I felt it
was time to update the website as well.
Here are some sketches:
http://www.andreasn.se/diverse/temp/foundation-website/foundation-website-mockup1.png
http://www.andreasn.se/diverse/temp/foundation-website/foundation-website-mockup2.png
http://www.andreasn.se/diverse/temp
Murray Cumming schrieb:
A restart of the www.gnome.org redesign/reimplementation effort might be
appropriate soon, but it's premature to start that now. Therefore I'll
be reverting or editing Thilo's recent live.gnome.org edits to make that
clearer.
I think some things need to be done
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 13:38 +0159, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
Murray Cumming schrieb:
A restart of the www.gnome.org redesign/reimplementation effort might be
appropriate soon, but it's premature to start that now. Therefore I'll
be reverting or editing Thilo's recent live.gnome.org edits to
live.gnome.org edits to make that
clearer.
I think some things need to be done now.
No, you can wait for a week.
It feels like I've picked up the phone in the middle of a conversation
here...
For those of us not on the web list, can we have some idea what's been
happening with the website
not on the web list, can we have some idea what's been
happening with the website infrastructure for the past couple of years,
please?
My mail to marketing list in August:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/marketing-list/2008-August/msg00022.html
(a bad email subject though)
My mail to gnome-web-list today
Murray Cumming schrieb:
I just wanted an answer to the question. The new GnomeWeb/www.gnome.org
page seemed useless and confused to me and you seem to be the intended
target audience/user of it.
I have already corrected other changes from Thilo on the GnomeWeb wiki
page, while updating it
Hi,
Seems I didn't answer this mail yet...
Thilo Pfennig wrote:
Dave Neary schrieb:
Here are my questions:
* the projects name is GNOME Mobile Embedded Initiative (GMAE) and
it should keep this name? As far as I understood the core idea is to
summarize some different platforms that all
Hi,
Let me reassure you, someone is working on a logo (picked up the task on
IRC today) - he may even be on this list (take a bow, vinci).
It is GNOME Mobile. Must be GNOME Mobile everywhere, except in the first
press release (historical data now) which use GNOME Mobile Embedded
initiative.
Another issue is the Contact page:
http://www.gnome.org/contact/
The question is what does contact suggest?
I would expect addresses one can get in contact. The information needed
is on www.gnome.org/press but not linked anywhere AFAIS
I have attached a version of that page that I woud
I agree the Contact page needs to be redone. Thanks.
Contact GNOME
- About http://www.gnome.org/about/
- Latest Release http://www.gnome.org/start/stable/
- Support http://www.gnome.org/support/
- Contribute http://www.gnome.org/community/
- Contact
or is it part of
Development - than why it is not linked on both pages?
I think GNOME mobile needs to be redefined and should be linked better
inside the web site if it is said to be THE priority. The website does
not reflect this priority since the news about forming the platform has
disappeared
Dave Neary schrieb:
Hi Thilo,
Hi Dave, thats hard for me, because I did not support this inititative
initially and also it is still not clear for me where it should go. But
I can ask questions here to make it more clear for me.
I add your points here:
channels should work:
- Website feedback should be channeled through Edit This Page links
and clever forms pointing to bugzilla+website+www.gnome.org, saving
the hassle to users. This way everything gets publicly recorded.
- The Contact Us page should be linked in the footer and should
contain
Website feedback going straight to bugzilla would rock. How about
doing something similar for all contact? This could create a queue of
sorts with feedback that needs to be dealt with. And we can use
bugzilla to handle assigning user feedback, info requests, etc and
ensure nothing falls through
quote who=Ken VanDine
I would also be in favor of using bugzilla or something similar to
track all marketing tasks. I generally use Jira for this both at work
and for foresight, very useful tool. Bugzilla can do it too, but jira
is designed a little more for managing work flow.
Sysadmin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Ken VanDine
I would also be in favor of using bugzilla or something similar to
track all marketing tasks. I generally use Jira for this both at work
and for foresight, very useful tool. Bugzilla can do it too, but
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 18:13 -0500, Glenn J.Mason wrote:
Hi, we're looking at updating the gnome-uk local website (www.uk.gnome.org)
and were wondering whether this could be hosted on GNOME server (e.g. window).
If this is plausible, how would doing so limit what we could do with the site
El dv 14 de 07 del 2006 a les 22:33 +0200, en/na karderio va escriure:
Here is my attempt at a large Made for GNOME button.
I like the design. However, shouldn't be better a Made with GNOME
button? Made for GNOME reminds me too much the infamous Optimized for
Browser X buttons.
Made with
I have made a GNOME button for the glipper website [1], a png file is
attached.
I find the text too little could you increase it by 1px ?
and could you make a version with 1px padding for the gnome foot image
(so that it doesn't touch the border)
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list
Hi :o)
Thanks for the feedback, I'm happy someone looked at this :)
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:54 +0200, AMAZIGH Aneglus wrote:
I find the text too little could you increase it by 1px ?
Well, it is of course possible, but the button actually respects a
chimeric standard that specifies that the
Re :o)
Here are another two variations, with the font adjusted in what I think
is an acceptable manner.
I'll try and do a big brother button later, it will probably read Made
for GNOME, for use on project pages, what do you think ?
Love, Karderio
gnome_80x15-3.png
Description: PNG image
Hi :o)
Here is my attempt at a large Made for GNOME button.
Same questions apply ;o)
Love, Karderio
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
Re,
I swore never to do this in public, but fate being what fate is : here
is the attachment.
Sorry, I'm going to hide in a corner now.
Love, Karderio
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 22:33 +0200, karderio wrote:
Hi :o)
Here is my attempt at a large Made for GNOME button.
Same questions apply ;o)
even in WC :). So it is fine.
Eek, the website I'm working on is plastered with them :) I wouldn't say
they are great though either, I mainly found it handy so as to provide
links to places I feel deserve coverage on every page. Also, I'm not
such a great graphic artist, so such things, along
here is the attachment.
It's fine !
you may submit this to the badge garden :) and add it to the
MarketingMaterials (it won't hurt anyone I think)
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
Eek, the website I'm working on is plastered with them :) I wouldn't say
they are great though either, I mainly found it handy so as to provide
links to places I feel deserve coverage on every page. Also, I'm not
such a great graphic artist, so such things, along with tango icons,
make my
Hi :o)
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 01:13 +0200, AMAZIGH Aneglus wrote:
Eek, the website I'm working on is plastered with them :) I wouldn't say
they are great though either, I mainly found it handy so as to provide
links to places I feel deserve coverage on every page. Also, I'm
Hi,
Claus Schwarm wrote:
It might be a good idea to look for several persons, not just for one.
The GNOME web is rather large. For example, you can't expect somebody
maintaining www.gnome.org to take care about live.gnome.org, too. This
is simply too much work for a single volunteer.
To be
, being the technical aspects
a part of it but not the primary.
- See what we have at http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb and see what can be
evolved or improved. This would become the official plan.
- Move from CVS to CMS in order to open and ease the development and
maintenance of the website
person to get
this done right. When you have one, you tend to gather like minded
people.. That has been my experience.
- Move from CVS to CMS in order to open and ease the development and
maintenance of the website. This CMS would be Drupal unless someone
comes with a better candidate during
Hi,
As some of you know, the board has talked about how the website should
be handled, and the best answer we have is someone should do it. So
we're officially looking for a someone - and all offers are on the
table. If you want to install a custom CMS, you'll have to debate
People interested in making the gnome.org website more consistant to our
marketing and project goals, please join the discussion in gnome-web-list:
Signing off the wgo goals
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-web-list/2005-December/msg00095.html
and specially to marketing-friendly gnomers:
Re
The gnome-web-list is starting to get involved so if you want to follow most
of the development have a look there.
btw. I thought the web-list was a better place to work on developing the
website.
Thanks,
Hugh Buzacott.
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http
Tom von Schwerdtner wrote:
On 6/7/05, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
One of the things that came out of GUADEC was that the website needs
some work. Over at the marketing team, a couple of people are working on
a checklist of things to do so that we can carve this up
to help out with this... but again I know
very little about the existing w.g.o setup.
--Ken
Quoting Andreas Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As some of you know, I've been working on a new Nautilus website the
last couple of days, heavily based on the gedit site. After a request by
Luis I have
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=James Henstridge
There have been a few discussions about improvements to the website on
this list, however not many of them have resulted in the changes getting
rolled out.
One of the proposals that was discussed was making the various developer
websites feel
quote who=James Henstridge
There have been a few discussions about improvements to the website on
this list, however not many of them have resulted in the changes getting
rolled out.
One of the proposals that was discussed was making the various developer
websites feel more coherent
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 10:40 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
One of the things that came out of GUADEC was that the website needs
some work. Over at the marketing team,
Where/who is this? I
a couple of people are working on
a checklist of things to do so that we can carve this up
I'd like to push this task in order to start working in things we
mentioned in the BOF. If you think it's worth I can put it in the wiki
(where?) to discuss it.
MISSION
Ease and optimize the involvement of people through the website
TARGETS
- normal users and newbies wanting to know about
101 - 155 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
