Re: redifining GNOME office.

But I think there's other folks around currently working on such a piece > of software. > > andre > -- > mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed > http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper > > -- > marketing-list mailing list > marketing-list@gnome.org > http:

Re: redifining GNOME office.

On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > Am Freitag, den 17.04.2009, 16:37 -0700 schrieb klyttle: >> I came across a presentation app for Gnome called Agnubis (strange name, I >> know). >> >> Not sure if it's still active, though; I really hope is it...it's definitely >> the "missin

Re: redifining GNOME office.

Am Freitag, den 17.04.2009, 16:37 -0700 schrieb klyttle: > I came across a presentation app for Gnome called Agnubis (strange name, I > know). > > Not sure if it's still active, though; I really hope is it...it's definitely > the "missing link". Links are helpful: http://projects.gnome.org/agnubi

Re: redifining GNOME office.

> functionality. >> >> -- >> Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org >> -- >> marketing-list mailing list >> marketing-list@gnome.org >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list >> > -- > marketing-list mailing list >

Re: redifining GNOME office.

A word limit would be good. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list

Re: redifining GNOME office.

On 4/4/07, Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMveryHO trying to marketing-wise (re)build a concept of GNOME Office to compete against OOo is even more futile than putting energies into beating Firefox's success with Epiphany. We have very limited energies, we better concentrate them in the

Re: redifining GNOME office.

We could very well base marketing on that concept. ie: "Still thinking your software working suite in terms of * Office?" and show that GNOME doesn't force you into using certain apps, but allows you to build your own suite in your own terms, but yet - they all "speak" to eachother hassle-free.

Re: redifining GNOME office.

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 23:30 +0300, Quim Gil wrote: > On 4/4/07, Alex Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > we would lose an important constituency (those making purchasing > > decisions, etc.) > > Those making purchasing decisions don't look at GNOME alone, look at > distributions. They think in F

Re: redifining GNOME office.

On 4/4/07, Alex Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > we would lose an important constituency (those making purchasing > decisions, etc.) Those making purchasing decisions don't look at GNOME alone, look at distributions. They think in Firefox, they think in Evolution/Thunderbird, they think in Open

Re: redifining GNOME office.

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 22:08 +0300, Quim Gil wrote: > Why don't we do the opposite: close officially GNOME Office and keep > working on the interoperability and integration between GNOME > applications. I think we're in rough agreement; whether or not there is an official "GNOME Office", we're sayi

Re: redifining GNOME office.

That would be fine with me, I just want to get all the areas covered. The major week point is the lack of a presentation app. --Ken On 4/4/07, Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why don't we do the opposite: close officially GNOME Office and keep > working on the interoperability and integrati

Re: redifining GNOME office.

Why don't we do the opposite: close officially GNOME Office and keep working on the interoperability and integration between GNOME applications. Do we need a concept of "Office" for GNOME nowadays? There is a lot of people working in offices with computers in the XXIth century, and they use all ki

Re: redifining GNOME office.

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 12:55 -0400, Ken VanDine wrote: > I definately agree. Not sure I agree with wikipedia says makes up > GNOME Office. But we need something that we can say works together, > abiword, gnumeric and gnome-db for sure. We still need a presentation > app, criawips also seems dead.

Re: redifining GNOME office.

I definately agree. Not sure I agree with wikipedia says makes up GNOME Office. But we need something that we can say works together, abiword, gnumeric and gnome-db for sure. We still need a presentation app, criawips also seems dead. Lets get these revitalized. I know people just say OpenOffi

redifining GNOME office.

Hi, I suggest we redefine GNOME Office. See als this bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422337. The Wikipedia website says http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Office The Ubuntu 6.10documentation also includes the following as part of