Dear MARMAM friends and colleagues,

my coauthors and I are pleased to announce the publication of the following 
papers. They both offer reflections on the phenomenon of swim-with wild 
dolphins and its management, but approach the topic from two, quite different, 
perspectives.

Fumagalli M., Cesario A., Costa M., Notarbartolo di Sciara G., Harraway J. and 
Slooten E. (2019). Population ecology and the management of whalewatching 
operations on a data-deficient dolphin population. 
Ecology and Evolution. 
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ece3.5565 
<https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ece3.5565>

Abstract: 1) Whale watching is a popular commercial activity, producing 
socio‐ecological benefits but also potential long‐term effects on the targeted 
cetacean population. This industry is currently developing in data‐deficient 
contexts in a largely unregulated fashion. Management schemes should adopt 
precaution and be informed by the relevant literature, but would be more 
effective if the assessment of the target population vulnerability, biological 
impacts, and management implications was drawn from site‐specific data. 2) This 
paper focuses on a reef‐associated, data‐deficient population of spinner 
dolphins in the Egyptian Red Sea. In Satayah Reef, new information on 
population size and dynamic parameters were documented using visual observation 
and photo‐identification‐based capture–recapture methods (Cormack–Jolly–Seber 
time‐since‐marking model). 3) Dolphins occurred on 98% of the survey days. 
Average school size was 66 individuals (±42.1 SE), with most groups including 
calves. The population was equally divided into recurrent and transient 
individuals. An “emigration + mortality” model best described residence at the 
site. Five recurrent males (5% of the Satayah population) provided connectivity 
between this and the geographically close population of Samadai Reef. 4) 
Average annual survival probability was 0.83 (±0.06 SE) in the year following 
first capture and 0.99 (±0.06 SE) for recurrent individuals. Mean yearly 
population sizes ranged 143–207 individuals. 5) The study had the power to 
detect a 30% decline in the population, but not the rate of change in abundance 
estimated from the data (r = 0.018 ± 0.04), which would have required a 3‐ to 
5‐times longer study. Synthesis and application: These findings advance the 
assessment of the Satayah population's intrinsic vulnerability and have three 
major management applications: (a) the delineation of management units; (b) the 
identification of key indicators for future impact monitoring and assessment; 
and (c) realistic estimates of the statistical power for trend detection. Based 
on our results, we recommend supporting future research, devising site‐specific 
time–area closure plans, and integrating them in a regional scheme. Approaches 
employed in this case study can inform the management of whale watching 
industries targeting other data‐deficient populations


Bertella G., Fumagalli M. and Williams-Grey V. (2019). Wildlife tourism through 
the co-creation lens. 
Tourism Recreation Research, 44(3): 300-310. 
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02508281.2019.1606977 
<https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02508281.2019.1606977>

Abstract: This study reflects on the conceptualisation of wild animals as 
co-creators. Its purpose is to encourage reflection about the role of animals 
in wildlife tourism. Therefore, to this end – and in the belief that diversity 
and creativity are important elements in critical thinking – the study was 
developed by a research team with diverse professional backgrounds. It adopts a 
fictional methodological approach, employing a fictive dialogue between a 
tourist joining a swim-with-dolphins tour and a dolphin and draws upon recent 
scholarly contributions on animals from the perspective of various disciplines, 
including philosophy, biology and tourism, The study’s most important 
contribution comes in the form of a discussion of the co-creation concept from 
a critical perspective, based on innovative and explicitly-described 
ontological, epistemological and methodological considerations


Please feel free to contact us should you have any comments or would like to 
request a copy of the works.

Best regards,
Madda

Maddalena Fumagalli, PhD
Marine Biologist & Conservation Scientist
www.linkedin.com/in/maddalena-fumagalli






_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
MARMAM@lists.uvic.ca
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to