Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-11-04 Thread Paula
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Les wrote: it's even more complicated. It certainly is; and this is an example of

Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-11-03 Thread Paula
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Thanks, Paddy. There are signs the mainstream is moving in a more skeptical

Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-11-03 Thread Louis Proyect
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 11/3/11 6:38 PM, Paula wrote:

Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-31 Thread Louis Proyect
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 10/31/11 6:30 PM, Paula wrote: Louis T. said: The people we are interested in

Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-29 Thread Louis Thiemann
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == An interesting situation. You have doubts, which is rightful, I would almost say

Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-28 Thread Shane Mage
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On Oct 28, 2011, at 6:00 PM, Mark Lause wrote: Paula thinks that global warming

[Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-26 Thread Paula
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Louis T wrote: The Himalaya number switch (2030 instead of 2300) is the one

Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-25 Thread Louis Thiemann
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == The Himalaya number switch (2030 instead of 2300) is the one mistake that is

[Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-24 Thread Paula
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Louis T. wrote that ...criticisms are aired, discussed, and the knowledge base

Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-22 Thread Louis Thiemann
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == The problem here is that the IPCC is both a research institution, and an 'object of

[Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-21 Thread Paula
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Louis says I have peculiar ideas about climate change and about imperialism.

[Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-20 Thread Paula
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Comment by Judith Curry on Laframboise’s book:

Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-20 Thread Louis Proyect
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 10/20/11 6:42 PM, Paula wrote: Comment by Judith Curry on Laframboise’s book:

Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-20 Thread Dave Leaton
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Paula, you give me one sensationalist and shill barking about another. Curry's

Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-20 Thread Louis Proyect
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == I would urge comrades not to spend too much time answering Paula. She is really a

Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-18 Thread Louis Proyect
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == On 10/18/2011 1:20 PM, Paula wrote: Globalization and biotechnology are fine by

[Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-18 Thread Paula
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Rod wrote: If the IPCC reports are a fraud, then tens of thousands of scientists

[Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-17 Thread Paula
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == by Canadian journalist Donna Laframboise:

Re: [Marxism] expose of the IPCC

2011-10-17 Thread Dave Leaton
== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. == Is this the same Laframboise who once said, I think capitalism, globalization, and