==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
NOTE BY HUNTER BEAR [MARCH 10 2011]
This post is going to a wide range of people
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Eli Stephens (elishasteph...@hotmail.com) wrote on 2011-03-10 at 09:16:47
in
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
After France has offered recognition to the rebels with the EU
following on
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 3/10/11 1:25 PM, Néstor Gorojovsky wrote:
OTOH, I agree FULLY with the real
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Shame on Gorojovsky for being a worthless troll who cuts off yplotz's explicit
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2011/3/9 Louis Proyect l...@panix.com:
As long as there is a single Marxist in
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Bonnie.
Very Good.
Nat
On Mar 10, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Bonnie Weinstein wrote:
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Thanks, Jim. Good to hear some sane voices on the left amid all the
vileness.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
This shows how far from reality the MRZine, Marcyite, and Chossudovsky
line of
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Well put, danan.
The most vicious imperialist attack going on in Libya right now
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I have admitted nothing, nor rejected anything. Perhaps I should have
written I
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
On 3/10/11 6:46 PM, Néstor Gorojovsky wrote:
I have admitted nothing, nor
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis, please, read my words. I said I have admitted nothing, nor
rejected
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_Z_TVrBUtw
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I will be on a panel: The Struggle Against Mainstream Economic Ideology
H.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Interesting remarks from, of all people, Hillary Clinton:
She also made a
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
It's certainly nice to hear Michael Moore talking like an opponent of the
power
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Brian Becker wrote (and Eli posted)
Shame on those U.S. liberal groups and
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I haven't seen this posted so far... it speaks to what this list is all
about.
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee has been a favourite hate of mine for a
long
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
sobuadhaigh wrote:
The target of the empire right now is the Libyan
regime which
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
sobuadha...@hushmail.com (sobuadha...@hushmail.com) wrote on
2011-03-10 at
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
So let's rather put our troops on the ground than have a no-fly zone..
-
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
These are the wisest words possible at this juncture.. thanks and regards,
comrade
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
OK, sorry I forgot the clip.
Send
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I was just reviewing WWP's analysis of Tienanmen in which the term massacre
was
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Comrades,
Arming the people in Libya has been of the most important
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
*/STOP PRESS/* March 11, 2011: *Munyaradzi Gwisai*, *Tafadzwa Antonater
Choto*,
I completely agree with Charles on this point, which is the only one he makes:
Finally, we are not individuals who form relationships. We are social
animals, deeply interpenetrated with one another, who emerge out of
relationships. Brooks
That point alone deserves to be called the new
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rip_Van_Winkle
Rip Van Winkle -
Rip Van Winkle is a short story by the American author Washington
Irving published in 1819, as well as the name of the story's fictional
protagonist. Written while Irving was living in Birmingham, England,
it was part of a collection
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8e/Haeckel_Trochilidae.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8e/Haeckel_Trochilidae.jpg
upload.wikimedia.org
___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@greenhouse.economics.utah.edu
To
Actually, the French Enlightenment was radical, the English Scottish, not so
much. The notion of social sentiments is quite reactionary. Interestingly, last
night Colbert let Brooks make a fool out of himself. But Charles in his dotage
finds this radical. Stupidity rolls like a mighty stream.
Ralph Dumainwrote:
Actually, the French Enlightenment was radical, the English Scottish, not
so much. The notion of social sentiments is quite reactionary. Interestingly,
last night Colbert let Brooks make a fool out of himself. But Charles in his
dotage finds this radical. Stupidity
In a message dated 3/10/2011 2:15:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
_rdumain@autodidactproject.org_ (mailto:rdum...@autodidactproject.org)
writes:
Actually, the French Enlightenment was radical, the English Scottish,
not so much. The notion of social sentiments is quite reactionary.
C. E. wrote:
But Brooks seems to think that ethics is matter of the emotions, not reason.
Emotivism - the claim that ethical sentences do not express propositions
but emotional attitudes - is hardly defensible. The fact/value distinction
is a bulwark of capitalism.
^
CB: I have to look
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:14:45 -0800 (PST) Ralph Dumain
rdum...@autodidactproject.org writes:
Actually, the French Enlightenment was radical, the English
Scottish, not so much. The notion of social sentiments is quite
reactionary. Interestingly, last night Colbert let Brooks make a
fool
The Portugese version of Wikipedia has an interesting
article on John Millar. For the English translation,
see:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=ensl=ptu=http://pt.wikipedia.o
rg/wiki/John_Millarei=o0x5TZfpKofMgQfx4aHWBwsa=Xoi=translatect=result
Ralph Dumain wrote:
Socialism is the realization of modern individualism, not its
negation. Individualism was a break from the oppressive bonds of the
past.
^
CB: Ah, now we see what's up with Ralph. He subscribes to
Individualism. He has a major bourgeois tumor in his thinking.
1. Begs the question about the existence of a left or the left or the lefts
etc.
2. Libyan crisis stories in US still help feed the various rulers of the
world, center of the earth, chosen people fantasies of US politics, from
leftish Democratic to right right Repug Party, but including Indie and
39 matches
Mail list logo