********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

-----Original Message-----
From: pe...@mail.csuchico.edu [mailto:pe...@mail.csuchico.edu] On Behalf Of 
Louis Proyect
full: 
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/08/18/why-economic-growth-will-fall/


Thanks, but is this sort of argument plausible?

"Productivity growth slowed sharply after 1970, with little variability from 
decade to decade. The slowdown has been puzzling scholars for four decades. My 
own view is that it is a decline from one thousand cuts. Important ones are 
rising energy prices, growing regulatory burdens, a structural shift from high- 
to low-productivity growth sectors (such as from manufacturing to services), as 
well as the source that Gordon emphasizes, the decline of fundamentally 
important inventions. So Gordon’s basic hypothesis looks rock solid: there has 
been a substantial slowdown in productivity growth since the end of the special 
century in 1970."

Really? Energy price hikes have forced capital to adopt much more efficient 
innovations in all sorts of systems in the energy, transport, production, 
agricultural and other sectors, surely? Deregulatory neoliberalism was 
introduced in the 1980s and intensified in the 1990s. In some sectors, services 
productivity would have soared with the introduction of ICT and internet 
retail. There are infinite numbers of new inventions, including fundamentally 
important ones such as the internet since 1970. 

Can Nordhaus not grapple with another of the 1000 cuts that seems to be the 
core problem the world economy is facing now, namely the overaccumulation of 
capital that started to become noticeable in the early 1970s? Apparently not... 


_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to