[Marxism] 2019-nCoV and the Virus of Chauvinism

[RKOB via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

2019-nCoV and the Virus of Chauvinism

A comparison with measles and the reactionary Anti-Vaxx campaigners

by Almedina Gunic, 6 February 2020

https://www.thecommunists.net/worldwide/global/2019-ncov-and-the-virus-of-chauvinism/

--
Revolutionär-Kommunistische Organisation BEFREIUNG
(Österreichische Sektion der RCIT, www.thecommunists.net)
www.rkob.net
ak...@rkob.net
Tel./SMS/WhatsApp/Telegram: +43-650-4068314

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] party of the left and historical materialism

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

On 2/7/20 8:18 PM, John Reimann via Marxism wrote:

As far as Hawkins belonging to a wing of the Grreens that included Bruce
Dixon: Dixon and his Black Agenda Report were (BAR still is) one of the
very worst of the horrible Assadists.


So what? Those ideas did not seep into the Green Party. Even Ajamu 
Baraka, Jill Stein's running-mate, said virtually nothing about Syria as 
a GP candidate.


Our tasks are national in character. As long as there is agreement on 
opposing fracking, a minimum wage of $20 or so, the right of transgender 
people to use a bathroom based on their identity, we can belong to the 
same party.


In fact, I find your positions on Venezuela and Nicaragua as odious as 
Bruce's on Syria but that would not prevent me from belonging to the 
same party as you.


When it comes to international issues, the litmus test should not be 
whether Maduro or Assad are bastards. It should be opposition to USA 
intervention. Both Bruce and I opposed American intervention in Syria 
but differed on the nature of the process there. The Trotskyist movement 
split into a thousand shards over how to characterize the Russian state. 
I still have a high regard for Trotsky's writings but I think the whole 
"scratch to gangrene" business needlessly Talmudic. When Max Schachtman 
became a State Department socialist, a split made sense. But did it make 
much difference in 1940 how surplus value was being generated in the USSR?

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] party of the left and historical materialism

[John Reimann via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

As far as Hawkins belonging to a wing of the Grreens that included Bruce
Dixon: Dixon and his Black Agenda Report were (BAR still is) one of the
very worst of the horrible Assadists. And BAR still in effect promotes the
Republicans as being a lesser evil compared to the Democrats, which they
brand as “the” (not “a” but “the”) war party. Having these Assadists inside
the Green Party is certainly no recommendation.

As far as the class nature of the Greens: I don't think whether they have
workers in them or not is central. In my opinion, what is central is how a
party develops. A working class party will develop out of an upheaval of
the working class itself.

Louis raises the prospect of a layer of youth and workers turning to the
Greens after the next election. I had thought that could happen after the
last one so i started going to GP meetings here in Oakland. It didnt happen
and i am very skeptical it will happen in the future (although I accept
that its possible. If it does happen, though, i think the more class
conscious elements (and those who don't support Assad) will be met with
resistance all up and down the party.
-- 
*“In politics, abstract terms conceal treachery.” *from "The Black
Jacobins" by C. L. R. James
Check out:https:http://oaklandsocialist.com also on Facebook
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] 1811 German Coast uprising - Wikipedia

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

(Just read about this in Edward Baptist's "The Half Has Never Been 
Told". I had no idea.)


The 1811 German Coast uprising was a revolt of black slaves in parts of 
the Territory of Orleans on January 8–10, 1811. The uprising occurred on 
the east bank of the Mississippi River in what is now St. John the 
Baptist, St. Charles and Jefferson Parishes, Louisiana.[1] While the 
slave insurgency was the largest in US history, the rebels killed only 
two white men. Confrontations with militia and executions after trial 
killed 95 black people.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1811_German_Coast_uprising
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] Inquiry strikes blow to Russian denials of Syria chemical attack | World news | The Guardian

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/07/inquiry-strikes-blow-to-russian-denials-of-syria-chemical-attack
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] A party of the left and historical materialism

[Andrew Stewart via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Regardless of how much hot air one expends on blogs and email ListServs, none 
of that is worth jack shit unless we are actually organizing to make these 
political aspirations material realities. If Socialist/Communist blogs, email 
newsletters, magazines, and journals were able to make organization 
materialize, we would have been a pure communist society a century ago. 

Cheerleading for Hawkins is not building a Green local that will collect the 
signatures to get him on a ballot or fundraising for his campaign, which is 
frankly very needed right now.

 And NOT doing that organizing gives ammo to the Democrats and the lesser-evil 
advocates who can point out the lack of organizing and say “See, Green voters 
aren’t going to stick around after Election Day and be there in solidarity.”

 And if you are not going to be offering solidarity, the cornerstone of 
socialist politics, WTF is the point?

Best regards,
Andrew Stewart 
- - -
Subscribe to the Washington Babylon newsletter via 
https://washingtonbabylon.com/newsletter/


Message: 9
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 12:08:22 -0500
From: Louis Proyect 
To: marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu
Subject: Re: [Marxism] A party of the left and historical materialism
Message-ID: <3cd32e39-ebec-e611-7303-f5b7bd300...@panix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

> On 2/7/20 11:45 AM, John Reimann via Marxism wrote:
> My point simply was that political parties are based on class, not simply
> ideas, and that any new party that is worth anything will emerge from the
> actual struggles of the working class, not from some nice ideas and good
> intentions of a relative handful of socialists. When and how such a
> struggle will develop - whether we are even close to such a struggle - is
> an entirely different issue.

Nobody, least of all me, believes that the Green Party will ever become 
the party that is necessary to transform the USA. However, there is a 
wing of it that is consciously and openly anti-capitalist, including 
Marxmailer Howie Hawkins who is a retired warehouse worker and Teamster 
Union member. Like John, he radicalized in the 60s and took a 
blue-collar job out of the understanding that the working-class had a 
revolutionary potential.

The wing that he belongs to included Bruce Dixon, a former Black Panther 
and editor of Black Agenda Report until his death last year. I have had 
long discussions with both Howie and Bruce about the Green Party 
evolving into a membership organization that can tap into the widespread 
discontent in this country. There is an outside possibility that if 
Howie is the presidential candidate and if the DP continues on its death 
march, the Greens can capitalize on this and strengthen their hand.

A vacuum exists in this country. With the utter collapse of the Leninist 
left, people are looking for an alternative to the two-party system and 
the weak tea politics of the DSA. There is absolutely no guarantee that 
the Greens can fill this vacuum but given the deep environmental crisis, 
there is an opening for a party that has a principled stand on the need 
for an anti-capitalist Green New Deal. The people who respond to this 
opening will be wage-earners. I have no idea how Greens make a living 
but I assume that they are no different than the average DP voter who is 
a schoolteacher, social worker, librarian, barista, web developer or 
nurse who would be thrown into a deep crisis if they lost a job, 
especially if they were over 40.

John dismisses the Greens because it is not "working class". Maybe not 
based on his criteria but there's another dimension that is worth 
considering. This is not a party that has people like Michael Bloomberg 
running for office. Nor does have any significant segment of the USA 
ruling class in its major leadership bodies.

Despite its obvious flaws, it is still worth supporting.

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] NY Times Opinion: Germany's Post-Nazi Taboo Against the Far Right Has Been Shattered

[Alan Ginsberg via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

[this is related to John Reimann's post "surprise election results in
eastern Germany"]

Events this week in German politics were horrifying. But they shouldn’t
have been a surprise.

By Lukas Hermsmeier

Mr. Hermsmeier is a journalist.

Feb. 7, 2020, 11:30 a.m. ET

BERLIN — Sometimes, it takes an earthquake to reveal what’s below the
surface.

In the eastern German state of Thuringia this week a regional election
displayed the disastrous state of Germany’s political center — and how far
the country now stands from the anti-fascist consensus it proclaims to
maintain.

On Wednesday, the state Parliament of Thuringia elected Thomas Kemmerich of
the Free Democratic Party as the new governor. The only reason Mr.
Kemmerich was able to win, though, was because he received the backing of
the far-right Alternative for Germany party, known by its German initials
AfD. The Free Democrats in Thuringia, along with members of Chancellor
Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union, agreed to the deal to ensure
Mr. Kemmerich took office.

In doing so, the center-right parties broke a taboo that has been in place
in German politics since the end of the Nazi era. Mr. Kemmerich became the
first high-ranking German politician since World War II to be elected by
relying on votes from a far-right party.

The centrists’ decision to side with the far right is especially worrying
in Thuringia, where the AfD is not only the second strongest party in the
regional parliament, but also more extreme than in any other state. The
AfD’s boss there, Björn Höcke, is the leader of a hard-line movement inside
the party known as “Der Flügel” — The Wing. In a 2018 book, he warned of
the “coming death of the nation through population replacement.” Last year,
a court ruled that he could legally be termed a fascist

The events in Thuringia have shaken German politics. Ms. Merkel called the
outcome “unforgivable.” Lars Klingbeil, the secretary general of the Social
Democrats, spoke of a “low point in Germany’s postwar history.” Even the
conservative tabloid Bild called the result a “disgrace.” After a wave of
public fury — including protests across the country — Mr. Kemmerich
announced on Thursday that he would resign in order to allow new elections.
(It’s far from clear that a new election wouldn’t produce even stronger
results for the AfD, however.)

But what led to these shameful machinations goes far deeper: the increasing
normalization of the radical right in German politics. Even if Germany’s
conservatives and liberals have not previously entered into formal
agreements with the far right at the federal level, and are unlikely to let
the AfD into a future government, they have nonetheless helped it gain
power and far too often set the agenda. That dynamic won’t disappear soon.

This was not the first time that centrists have collaborated with the AfD.
There have been at least 18 cases in which Ms. Merkel’s party has
cooperated with the AfD on a local level, it was reported last fall. In the
state parliaments of Berlin and Brandenburg, for example, the two parties
have voted together on legislation. Leading Christian Democrats from
several states have declared their willingness to work with the far-right
party. In Saxony-Anhalt, the two parties teamed up in 2017 on an “inquiry
on left extremism.” And in the same state, two Christian Democratic members
of Parliament wrote a position paper last year in which they considered a
coalition with the AfD. “We must reconcile the social with the national,”
they stated, echoing neo-Nazi rhetoric.

The AfD has grown consistently since its founding in 2013 and is now
present in the parliaments of every one of Germany’s 16 states. The parties
of the center, meanwhile, have all shifted rightward. Both the Free
Democrats, under their leader Christian Lindner, and the Christian
Democrats have moved their policy platforms in an anti-immigrant direction.
Neither Ms. Merkel nor the party’s new leader, Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer,
have created clear boundaries between their party and the far right. But
many voters, especially in the east of Germany, would rather buy the
original product than its copies.

How did it come to this? One major factor is the obsession of many German
centrists with the so-called horseshoe theory of politics, where the far
left and the far right are equivalent.

Ms. Merkel’s Christian Democrats have been guided by this theory. In an
official resolution, the party stated that it will never enter coalition
with either the Left Party or the AfD. In Thuringia, it was this unmovable
opposition to the left — demonized in its entirety by conservatives and
liberals, citing the Left Pa

[Marxism] The Revolutionary Cinema of Patricio Guzman | Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*


On February 12th, the IFC in New York will begin showing “The Cordillera 
of Dreams”, the latest film from Patricio Guzman. The 78-year-old 
Chilean is one of Latin America’s most celebrated leftwing directors, 
whose three-part “The Battle of Chile” became an iconic film alongside 
Octavio Getino and Fernando Solanas’s 1968 tripartite “Hour of the 
Furnaces” that dealt with the revolutionary movement in Argentina. For 
sixties radicals like me, these films were required viewing. Timed to 
the release of Guzman’s latest, Ovid—the Netflix of the left—has added 
five Guzman films to their nonpareil inventory. After some words on “The 
Cordillera Of Dreams”, I will cover some of the new Ovid offerings.


Cordillera is the Spanish word for mountain range, such as the Andes 
that Guzman uses as a symbol of Chilean hopes and disappointment. 
Constituting 80 percent of Chile’s landmass, it is the primary source of 
the country’s copper-mining wealth and its cultural legacy. For most 
Chileans, it is just something seen in landscape paintings, including a 
mural in the Santiago subway.


Like a leitmotif in one of Wagner’s operas, Guzman returns to images of 
the mountains, captured beautifully by a drone. They serve as a backdrop 
for the nation’s search for identity in a period when neoliberalism 
governs all social relations. That identity remains with him despite not 
having lived in the country since the coup. In dozens of films since 
“The Battle of Chile”, he has struggled to keep alive the dreams that 
marked the pre-coup years when everything seemed possible. The 
cordillera of dreams is a way of saying that dreams are as permanent as 
the Andes.


full: 
https://louisproyect.org/2020/02/07/the-revolutionary-cinema-of-patricio-guzman/

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] A party of the left and historical materialism

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

On 2/7/20 11:45 AM, John Reimann via Marxism wrote:

My point simply was that political parties are based on class, not simply
ideas, and that any new party that is worth anything will emerge from the
actual struggles of the working class, not from some nice ideas and good
intentions of a relative handful of socialists. When and how such a
struggle will develop - whether we are even close to such a struggle - is
an entirely different issue.


Nobody, least of all me, believes that the Green Party will ever become 
the party that is necessary to transform the USA. However, there is a 
wing of it that is consciously and openly anti-capitalist, including 
Marxmailer Howie Hawkins who is a retired warehouse worker and Teamster 
Union member. Like John, he radicalized in the 60s and took a 
blue-collar job out of the understanding that the working-class had a 
revolutionary potential.


The wing that he belongs to included Bruce Dixon, a former Black Panther 
and editor of Black Agenda Report until his death last year. I have had 
long discussions with both Howie and Bruce about the Green Party 
evolving into a membership organization that can tap into the widespread 
discontent in this country. There is an outside possibility that if 
Howie is the presidential candidate and if the DP continues on its death 
march, the Greens can capitalize on this and strengthen their hand.


A vacuum exists in this country. With the utter collapse of the Leninist 
left, people are looking for an alternative to the two-party system and 
the weak tea politics of the DSA. There is absolutely no guarantee that 
the Greens can fill this vacuum but given the deep environmental crisis, 
there is an opening for a party that has a principled stand on the need 
for an anti-capitalist Green New Deal. The people who respond to this 
opening will be wage-earners. I have no idea how Greens make a living 
but I assume that they are no different than the average DP voter who is 
a schoolteacher, social worker, librarian, barista, web developer or 
nurse who would be thrown into a deep crisis if they lost a job, 
especially if they were over 40.


John dismisses the Greens because it is not "working class". Maybe not 
based on his criteria but there's another dimension that is worth 
considering. This is not a party that has people like Michael Bloomberg 
running for office. Nor does have any significant segment of the USA 
ruling class in its major leadership bodies.


Despite its obvious flaws, it is still worth supporting.
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] A party of the left and historical materialism

[John Reimann via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

In the first place, I have no illusions in either carpenters nor any other
section of the working class. I just referred to the struggles of
carpenters that I did because Louis was much too categorical in his comment
on construction workers. Also, maybe Louis didn't notice what I added to my
original message - that it's true that all these struggles I mentioned were
simply for the immediate interests of these carpenters, but it's exactly
out of such struggles that a wider consciousness emerges.

In any case, who ever said that construction workers - or blue collar
workers in general - will be in the vanguard of a wider movement of the
working class? I never did. Never even implied it either.

Nor, contrary to what Anthony Boynton implies, do I have any illusions in
the state of affairs within the US working class in general. In fact, I've
written frequently about the "crisis in the US working class."

My point simply was that political parties are based on class, not simply
ideas, and that any new party that is worth anything will emerge from the
actual struggles of the working class, not from some nice ideas and good
intentions of a relative handful of socialists. When and how such a
struggle will develop - whether we are even close to such a struggle - is
an entirely different issue.

John Reimann

-- 
*“In politics, abstract terms conceal treachery.” *from "The Black
Jacobins" by C. L. R. James
Check out:https:http://oaklandsocialist.com also on Facebook
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] The Tragedy of the Worker: Towards the Proletarocene - Salvage

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Apocalypse has begun. The button has been pushed. Humanity is already 
committed to irreversible climate change. Climate activists are, in 
Richard Wilbur’s phrase, ‘mad-eyed from stating the obvious’. To 
understand the scale of what faces us, and the way it ramifies into 
every corner of our lives, is to marvel that we aren’t having emergency 
meetings in every city, town and village every week.


https://salvage.zone/editorials/the-tragedy-of-the-worker-towards-the-proletarocene/
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] The Economy Not Worth Defending: A Response to Trump’s State of the Union - CounterPunch.org

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

And what of Trump’s own preferred economic metrics? It’s certainly true 
that unemployment is near a 70-year low, standing at 3.5 percent in 
December 2019. The only other periods in modern history that saw lower 
unemployment rates were the late 1940s (1948), the early 1950s 
(1951-1953) and the late 1960s (1968-1969). But these comparisons are 
highly deceptive. They fail to account for the rise of contingent labor 
in the modern era, with the overwhelming majority of new jobs created 
from 2005 to 2015 – 94 percent – falling into what Harvard and Princeton 
economists call “alternative work” arrangements. These “alternative” 
jobs in the modern gig economy include contract work, freelance jobs, 
temp agency positions, on-call positions, and employment with contract 
companies. These jobs are highly unreliable, often failing to provide 
Americans with stable work, a living wage, or adequate benefits such as 
health care and a secure retirement. Trump’s America provides a plethora 
of jobs to choose from. Whether any of them are worth taking is another 
question entirely.


https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/02/07/the-economy-not-worth-defending-a-response-to-trumps-state-of-the-union/
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] [UCE] Blue Acceleration: Capitalism's growing assault on the oceans

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

https://climateandcapitalism.com/2020/02/05/blue-acceleration-capitalisms-growing-assault-on-the-oceans/
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] From Meyer London to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[Louis Proyect via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Eric Blanc butchers American history once again. Papers over the 
difference between Meyer London, an SP Congressman from a century ago, 
and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat. He writes:


"The potency of this dynamic was again manifest during the recent 
campaigns of Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez. Their advocacy of democratic 
socialism — despite being more social democratic than London and the 
SP’s vision — recruited tens of thousands of new members to DSA, 
including the rank-and-file leaders of West Virginia’s 2018 teachers’ 
strike."


More social democratic than London? WTF? Just last night I was watching 
Bernie Sanders on a CNN Town Hall (he was very good) and the question of 
his socialism came up. Once again, it was "like Finland, Sweden and 
Norway." These are capitalist states, aren't they? "More social 
democratic" means being in favor of a welfare state. Period.


These kinds of circumlocutions make me break out in hives. In any case, 
let them advocate their "democratic socialism". Maybe the idea is to 
start using the word communism again just to draw clear class lines.


https://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/03/meyer-london-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-congress
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] [UCE] I want to be a paperback writer--book review

[Ron Jacobs via Marxism]

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

http://stillhomeron.blogspot.com/2020/02/i-want-to-be-paperback-writer.html

-- 
Check out my newest books *Still Tripping in the Dark

*,* Capitalism
,
and Daydream Sunset:60s Counterculture in the 70s
 *
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com